Connecticut 2023 Regular Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 24 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 963 — AN ACT CONCERNING NEONICOTINOIDS FOR NONAGRICULTURAL USE.

Last action — FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

12 added · 137 removed

12 line(s) added, 137 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate General Assembly File No.
General Assembly Substitute Bill No.
242 January Session, 2023 Substitute Senate Bill No.
963 January Session, 2023 AN ACT CONCERNING NEONICOTINOIDS FOR NONAGRICULTURAL USE.
963 Senate, March 28, 2023 The Committee on Environment reported through SEN.
LOPES of the 6th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING NEONICOTINOIDS FOR NONAGRICULTURAL USE.
Subsection (l) of section 22a-50 of the general statutes is repealed andthefollowing issubstituted inlieu thereof(EffectiveOctober 1, 2023):
Subsection (l) of section 22a-50 of the general statutes is repealed andthefollowing is substituted inlieuthereof(EffectiveOctober 1, 2023):
(2) On and after January 1, 2024, no person shall sell, possess or use any pesticide that contains any neonicotinoid, as defined in section 22- 61k, except that such pesticide may be used on an agricultural plant or to eliminate aninvasive invertebrate pest ifthe Commissioner ofEnergy andEnvironmentalProtection,afterconsultationwiththedirectorofthe Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, determines that no other sSB963 / File No.
(2) On and after January 1, 2024, no person shall sell, possess or use any pesticide that contains any neonicotinoid, as defined in section 22- 61k, except that such pesticide may be used on an agricultural plant or to eliminate aninvasive invertebrate pest ifthe Commissioner ofEnergy andEnvironmentalProtection,afterconsultationwiththedirectorofthe Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, determines that no other effective control option is available.
242 1 sSB963 File No.
242 effective control option is available.
For purposes of this subdivision, "agricultural plant" means any plant, or part of any plant, that is grown, maintained or otherwise produced for commercial purposes, including, but not limited to, any plant grown, maintained or otherwise produced for sale or trade, for research or experimental purposes or for use, in part or in whole, in another locationsuchasany grain,fruit, vegetable,woodfiber or timber product, flowering or foliage plant or tree, seedling, transplant or turf grass produced for sod.
For purposes of this subdivision, "agricultural plant" means LCO \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00963-R01 of 3 SB.docx Substitute Bill No.
963 any plant, or part of any plant, that is grown, maintained or otherwise produced for commercial purposes, including, but not limited to, any plant grown, maintained or otherwise produced for sale or trade, for research or experimental purposes or for use, in part or in whole, in another locationsuchasany grain,fruit, vegetable,woodfiber or timber product, flowering or foliage plant or tree, seedling, transplant or turf grass produced for sod.
sSB963 / File No.
Section 1 October 1, 2023 22a-50(l) ENV Joint Favorable Subst.
242 2 sSB963 File No.
LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00963-2 of 3 R02-SB.docx } Substitute Bill No.
242 Section 1 October 1, 2023 22a-50(l) ENV Joint Favorable Subst.
963 APP Joint Favorable LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00963- 3 of 3 R02-SB.docx }
sSB963 / File No.
242 3 sSB963 File No.
242 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 24 $ FY 25 $ Department of Energy and GF - Revenue Potential Potential Environmental Protection Gain Department of Energy and GF - Cost 31,541 64,659 Environmental Protection State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Cost 13,506 27,687 Benefits1 Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill establishes a ban, beginning January 1, 2024, on selling, possessing, or using pesticide neonicotinoid pesticides, with certain exemptions (including agriculture).
2 This results in total costs to the state of $45,047 in FY 24 (for nine months) and$92,346 in FY 25 for a new Environmental Analyst 2 within the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) to handle the bill's requirements.
The costs may be offset by revenue resulting from violations to the extent they are enforced by the new staff person.
The costs of the new DEEP analyst are:
(1) $31,541 to DEEP in FY 24;
and (2) $13,506 in FY 24 to the Office of the State Comptroller for associated fringe benefits, adjusting for six months.
These costs are The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller.
The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 42.82% of payroll in FY 24.
2A neonicotinoid is a pesticide that impacts the nervous system of an organism.
sSB963 / File No.
242 4 sSB963 File No.
242 annualized in FY 25.
Currently, there are no DEEP staff solely tasked with identification of neonicotinoid products;
the new staff person would be tasked with this in addition to performing the product reclassification, inspection, and enforcement activities.
There are presently two dedicated staff at DEEP who are responsible for all pesticide registration and classification (including aquatic permitting), and there are currently over 13,000 pesticide product registrations within the Pesticide Management Program.
Regarding inspections and enforcement, there are currently three staffatDEEPperformingallpesticideinspectionsandaportionofastaff position performing enforcement activities regarding pesticide laws of approximately 1,100 registered pesticides (and arborist businesses), approximately 9,000 commercial pesticide applicators, 500 certified private applicators (farms), and an unknown number of pesticide retailers.
The bill also authorizes DEEP to assess a civil penalty of up to $2,500 per violation to anyone who violates the ban.
To the extent that violations are discovered and fined, this will result in a revenue gain to the General Fund.
Show all 70 changed rows (30 more)
Previous
Latest
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation and changes in staff salaries and benefits.
sSB963 / File No.
242 5 sSB963 File No.
242 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 963 AN ACT CONCERNING NEONICOTINOIDS FOR NONAGRICULTURAL USE.
SUMMARY This bill generally prohibits, beginning January 1, 2024, selling, possessing, or using a pesticide that has any neonicotinoid (see BACKGROUND).
The bill exempts the following from the ban:
1.
use on agricultural plants;
2.
use to eliminate an invasive invertebrate pest if the Department of Environmental Protection (DEEP) commissioner, after consulting with the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station’s (CAES) director, determines that there is no effective available alternative;
and 3.
any neonicotinoid that is not labeled for plant use such as those for pet care, veterinary purposes, or for indoor or structural pest control.
The bill authorizes the commissioner to assess a civil penalty of up to $2,500 per violation to anyone who violates the ban.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2023 AGRICULTURAL PLANTS Under the bill, an “agricultural plant” is a plant or plant part that is grown, maintained, or produced for commercial purposes, such as for sale or trade, research or experiments, or use (in whole or part) in another location.
It includes things like a grain, fruit, vegetable, wood fiber or timber product, flowering or foliage plant or tree, seedling, transplant, or turf grass for sod.
sSB963 / File No.
242 6 sSB963 File No.
242 It excludes from the definition pasture or rangeland for grazing.
INVASIVE INVERTEBRATE PESTS The bill allows the CAES director to consult with the Pesticide Advisory Council to determine if a pesticide is the only effective control option available for an invasive invertebrate pest.
Under the bill, this pest is any invertebrate species, including its eggs or other biological material that can propagate the species, that also:
1.
isregulatedorunderquarantinebyCAESortheU.S.Department of Agriculture or 2.
occurs outside of its Level III ecoregion (i.e., an area defined by theU.S.
EnvironmentalProtectionAgency (EPA)based onthings like geology, vegetation, soils, and hydrology) and is, or threatens to be, a substantial pest to plants of economic importance, an environmental harm, or harmful to human, animal, or plant health.
BACKGROUND Neonicotinoid By law, a neonicotinoid is a pesticide that selectively acts on an organism’s nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (i.e., impacts the nervous system), including clothianidin, dinotefuran, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and any other pesticide that the DEEP commissioner, after consulting with CAES, determines will kill at least 50% of a bee population when up to two micrograms of it is applied to each bee (CGS § 22-61k).
Neonicotinoids that are labeled for treating plants are “restricted use,” and may only be applied by someone certified under state law to do so or by someone that person supervises.
Neonicotinoids are currently under review by the EPA.
COMMITTEE ACTION Environment Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 27 Nay 6 (03/10/2023) sSB963 / File No.
242 7
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  2. NO NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Appropriations

  3. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  4. FILED WITH LCO

  5. Joint Favorable

  6. REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ON Appropriations

  7. FILE NO. 242

  8. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 167

  9. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  10. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  11. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/27/23

  12. FILED WITH LCO

  13. Joint Favorable Substitute

  14. PUBLIC HEARING 0215

  15. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Environment

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

33 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 154 not signed on

Sponsors (33)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (154)

154 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 154 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 963?
SB 963 is sponsored by Lucy Dathan (Democratic), Aimee Berger-Girvalo (Democratic), Joseph P. Gresko (Democratic), Christine Cohen (Democratic), Travis Simms (Democratic), Kerry S. Wood (Democratic), Khanna, Rachel, Mary M. Mushinsky (Democratic), Julie Kushner (Democratic), Jane M. Garibay (Democratic), Jennifer Leeper (Democratic), Michel, David, Bobby G. Gibson (Democratic), Josh Elliott (Democratic), Matt Blumenthal (Democratic), Mccarthy Vahey, Cristin, Arzeno, Hector, Jillian Gilchrest (Democratic), Mitch Bolinsky (Republican), John-Michael Parker (Democratic), Porter, Robyn A., Robin E. Comey (Democratic), Brandon Chafee (Democratic), Delany, Hubert D., Frank Smith (Democratic), Keitt, Sarah, Patricia A. Dillon (Democratic), Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic), Maria P. Horn (Democratic), Bumgardner, Aundre, Martha Marx (Democratic), Ceci Maher (Democratic), and Jan Hochadel (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 963?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 963?
Track SB 963 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 963

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 963

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →