AN ACT CONCERNING CERTAIN PROCEDURES FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS OF PISTOL PERMIT APPLICANTS.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 967 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 967.
You're tracking SB 967
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 967 — AN ACT CONCERNING CERTAIN PROCEDURES FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS OF PISTOL PERMIT APPLICANTS.
Last action — FILE NO. 340
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
123 added · 38 removed123 line(s) added, 38 removed.
Senate General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
967340 January Session, 2023 LCOSenate Bill No.
3987967 ReferredSenate, toMarch 30, 2023 The Committee on PUBLICPublic SAFETYSafety ANDand SECURITYSecurity Introducedreported by:through SEN.
(PS)GASTON ANof ACTthe CONCERNING23rd CERTAINDist., PROCEDURESChairperson FORof BACKGROUNDthe CHECKSCommittee OFon PISTOLthe PERMITpart APPLICANTS.of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING CERTAIN PROCEDURES FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS OF PISTOL PERMIT APPLICANTS.
(f) Any bona fide resident of the United States having no bona fide permanent residence within the jurisdiction of any local authority in the state, but who has a permit or license to carry a pistol or revolver issued bybytheauthorityofanotherstateorsubdivisionoftheUnitedStates,may the authority of another state or subdivision of the United States, may apply directly to the Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public Protection for a permit to carry a pistol or revolver in this state.
All provisions of subsections (b), (c), (d) and (e) of this section shall apply to applications for a permit received by the commissionerSB967 under/ thisFile subsection.No.
LCO340 39871 \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00967-R01-S1SB967 ofFile 2 Bill No.
967340 Sec.commissioner under this subsection.
Sec.
(b) The local authority, or the commissioner in the case of an application pursuant to subsection (f) of section 29-28, as amended by this act, shall [take] forward the fingerprints of such applicant [or conduct any other method of positive identification required by the State Police Bureau of Identification or the Federal Bureau of Investigation,Investigation,unlessthe unlesslocalauthorityorthecommissioner the local authority or the commissioner determines that the fingerprints of such applicant have been previously taken and the applicant's identity established, and such applicant presents identification that the local authority or the commissioner verifies as valid.
2 July 1, 2023 29-29(b) PS Joint Favorable LCOSB967 3987/ {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00967-R01-SB.doc2File ofNo. 2 }
340 2 SB967 File No.
340 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 24 $ FY 25 $ Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential See Below See Below Revenue Gain Department of Emergency Applicant See Below See Below Services and Public Protection Fingerprint Card Submission Account - Potential Revenue Gain Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill requires certain applicants to submit to a state background check for an initial or renewal pistol permit, resulting in a potential revenue gain to the General Fund and the Applicant Fingerprint Card Submission Account within the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP), to the extent that additional background checks are conducted.
DESPP conducts state background checks for a $75 fee per person, paid to the General Fund.
State background checks also require fingerprinting, which DESPP conducts for a $15 fee per person, paid to the Applicant Fingerprint Card Submission Account.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the number of additional background checks conducted.
1Funds in the non-lapsing Applicant Fingerprint Card Submission Account are used for IT support and maintenance for the fingerprinting systems.
SB967 / File No.
340 3 SB967 File No.
340 OLR Bill Analysis SB 967 AN ACT CONCERNING CERTAIN PROCEDURES FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS OF PISTOL PERMIT APPLICANTS.
SUMMARY By law, a nonresident with a valid out-of-state gun permit may apply directly to the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP) commissioner for a Connecticut handgun permit.
This bill explicitly requires the commissioner to require these nonresident handgun permit applicants to submit to state and national criminal history checks conducted under state law.
By law, the DESPP commissioner must follow the same fingerprinting and criminal history check procedures that state law requires for local officials processing temporary state handgun permit applications.
The bill also eliminates specified provisions for these fingerprinting and criminal history check procedures but continues to require both the DESPP commissioner and local officials to forward an applicant’s fingerprints to the State Police Bureau of Identification (SPBI), which must conduct the criminal history checks as state law requires.
Specifically, the bill eliminates provisions authorizing them to:
1.
use positive identification methods other than fingerprinting for these criminal history checks and 2.
opt not to take an applicant’s fingerprints if they determine that the applicant’s fingerprints were previously taken and the applicant presents valid identification.
SB967 / File No.
340 4 SB967 File No.
340 The bill also eliminates requirements that they:
1.
take an applicant’s fingerprints for criminal history checks, requiring instead that they forward the fingerprints to SPBI for these purposes;
Show all 46 changed lines (6 more)
and 2.
recordthedate fingerprintswere takenintheapplicant’sfile and, within five days, forward them or other positive identifying information to SPBI.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 1, 2023 BACKGROUND Related Bill sHB 6839, favorably reported by the Public Safety and Security Committee, repeals the same provision authorizing the permit issuing authority to opt not to take an applicant’s fingerprints under certain circumstances.
COMMITTEE ACTION Public Safety and Security Committee Joint Favorable Yea 25 Nay 0 (03/16/2023) SB967 / File No.
340 5
Show all 46 changed rows (6 more)
Action History
-
FILE NO. 340
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 200
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/29/23
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0223
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Public Safety and Security
Sponsors
- Public Safety And Security Committee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Public Safety And Security Committee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (186)
186 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 186 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 967?
- SB 967 is sponsored by Public Safety And Security Committee.
- What is the current status of SB 967?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 967?
- Track SB 967 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 967
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 967
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →