California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 1065 — Dismissal or denial of petitions to compel arbitration: appeals: Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 628, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, establishes various procedures for the reporting, investigation, and prosecution of elder and dependent adult abuse, and it sets forth specific provisions governing civil actions arising from the abuse of elderly or dependent adults. Existing law permits a party to a civil action who is over 70 years of age to petition the court for preference under certain circumstances. Under existing law, an aggrieved party may appeal certain orders and judgments, including an order dismissing or denying a petition to compel arbitration. Existing law specifies the time in which specified actions must occur during an appeal. This bill would require the court of appeal, in an appeal of an order dismissing or denying a petition to compel arbitration involving a claim under the Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act in which a party has been granted a court preference, to issue its decision no later than 100 days after the notice of appeal is filed, except as specified. This bill would require the Judicial Council, no later than July 1, 2017, to adopt rules implementing this provision and shortening the time within which a party may file a notice of appeal in these cases.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 628, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5447.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6242.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From consent calendar on motion of Assembly Member Waldron.

  9. Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

  10. From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (August 10).

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

  13. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  14. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 28).

  16. June 21 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  17. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  18. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  19. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 9. Page 3738.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 3700.) (April 26).

  22. Set for hearing April 26.

  23. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  24. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  25. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  26. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 18.

  27. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Monning · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Monning

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB1065 Monning Concurrence

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36000
Democratic 3000
Total 39000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Hernandez — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hall — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Bates — Yea
Block — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

SB 1065 Monning Senate Third Reading By CHIU

Passed 79 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 69001
Democratic 5000
Republican 5000
Total 79001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Harper — Yea
Holden — Yea
Kim — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Burke — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chang — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Campos — Yea
Daly — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass. To Consent Calendar.

Passed 19 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15001
Democratic 2000
Republican 2000
Total 19001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Daly — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Holden — Yea
Chang — Not Voting
Bigelow — Yea
Chu — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 26 Yea · 9 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 24805
Democratic 2100
Total 26905
% of votes cast 65%23%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Block — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hertzberg — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Pan — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Cannella — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 6 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5100
Democratic 1000
Total 6100
% of votes cast 86%14%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Leno — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1065 do?
Existing law, the Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, establishes various procedures for the reporting, investigation, and prosecution of elder and dependent adult abuse, and it sets forth specific provisions governing civil actions arising from the abuse of elderly or dependent adults. Existing law permits a party to a civil action who is over 70 years of age to petition the court for preference under certain circumstances. Under existing law, an aggrieved party may appeal certain orders and judgments, including an order dismissing or denying a petition to compel arbitration. Existing law specifies the time in which specified actions must occur during an appeal. This bill would require the court of appeal, in an appeal of an order dismissing or denying a petition to compel arbitration involving a claim under the Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act in which a party has been granted a court preference, to issue its decision no later than 100 days after the notice of appeal is filed, except as specified. This bill would require the Judicial Council, no later than July 1, 2017, to adopt rules implementing this provision and shortening the time within which a party may file a notice of appeal in these cases.
Who sponsors SB 1065?
SB 1065 is sponsored by Monning.
What is the current status of SB 1065?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1065?
Track SB 1065 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1065

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1065

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →