AB 459 — Insurance: insurable interest: declaratory relief.
Last action — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Jackson.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides that an insurable interest, with reference to life and disability insurance, is an interest based upon a reasonable expectation of pecuniary advantage through the continued life, health, or bodily safety of another person and consequent loss by reason of that person's death or disability or a substantial interest engendered by love and affection in the case of individuals closely related by blood or law. An individual has an unlimited insurable interest in his or her own life, health, and bodily safety and may lawfully take out a policy of insurance on his or her own life, health, or bodily safety and have the policy made payable to whomsoever he or she pleases, regardless of whether the beneficiary designated has an insurable interest. Existing law, effective January 1, 2010, provides that any device, scheme, or artifice designed to give the appearance of an insurable interest when there is no insurable interest, violates the insurable interest laws. This bill would authorize an owner of record of a life insurance policy, who believes in good faith that the insurer may challenge the policy for lack of an insurable interest, to bring an action, on or before January 1, 2018, for declaratory relief seeking a court order declaring the policy to have a valid insurable interest. The bill would limit the applicability of these provisions to policies issued for delivery in California prior to January 1, 2010, that have a death benefit equal to or greater than $1,000,000, when the owner of record was the owner of record on the effective date of these provisions. The bill would also prohibit an owner of record or the insurer from commencing an action against the named insured or a relative of the insured of the policy seeking damages or any other remedy if a court enters a judgment in an action brought pursuant to these provisions declaring a life insurance policy void on the basis that the policy was issued to a person who lacked an insurable interest. These provisions would remain in effect only until January 1, 2018, and would then be repealed.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/02/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 02, 2016
- Amended 07/06/15 - Amended Senate pdf July 06, 2015
- Introduced 02/23/15 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2015
- AB459 View text html
Action History
-
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Jackson.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Coms. on INS. and JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1141.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 21).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Coms. on INS. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Daly · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Daly
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Not Voting |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 459 do?
- Existing law provides that an insurable interest, with reference to life and disability insurance, is an interest based upon a reasonable expectation of pecuniary advantage through the continued life, health, or bodily safety of another person and consequent loss by reason of that person's death or disability or a substantial interest engendered by love and affection in the case of individuals closely related by blood or law. An individual has an unlimited insurable interest in his or her own life, health, and bodily safety and may lawfully take out a policy of insurance on his or her own life, health, or bodily safety and have the policy made payable to whomsoever he or she pleases, regardless of whether the beneficiary designated has an insurable interest. Existing law, effective January 1, 2010, provides that any device, scheme, or artifice designed to give the appearance of an insurable interest when there is no insurable interest, violates the insurable interest laws. This bill would authorize an owner of record of a life insurance policy, who believes in good faith that the insurer may challenge the policy for lack of an insurable interest, to bring an action, on or before January 1, 2018, for declaratory relief seeking a court order declaring the policy to have a valid insurable interest. The bill would limit the applicability of these provisions to policies issued for delivery in California prior to January 1, 2010, that have a death benefit equal to or greater than $1,000,000, when the owner of record was the owner of record on the effective date of these provisions. The bill would also prohibit an owner of record or the insurer from commencing an action against the named insured or a relative of the insured of the policy seeking damages or any other remedy if a court enters a judgment in an action brought pursuant to these provisions declaring a life insurance policy void on the basis that the policy was issued to a person who lacked an insurable interest. These provisions would remain in effect only until January 1, 2018, and would then be repealed.
- Who sponsors AB 459?
- AB 459 is sponsored by Daly.
- What is the current status of AB 459?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 459?
- Track AB 459 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 459
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 459
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →