Physician assistants.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 337 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 337.
You're tracking SB 337
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 337 — Physician assistants.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 536, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law, the Physician Assistant Practice Act, provides for regulation of physician assistants and authorizes a physician assistant to perform medical services as set forth by regulations when those services are rendered under the supervision of a licensed physician and surgeon, as specified. The act requires the supervising physician and surgeon to review, countersign, and date a sample consisting of, at a minimum, 5% of the medical records of patients treated by the physician assistant functioning under adopted protocols within 30 days of the date of treatment by the physician assistant. The act requires the supervising physician and surgeon to select for review those cases that by diagnosis, problem, treatment, or procedure represent, in his or her judgment, the most significant risk to the patient. A violation of those supervision requirements is a misdemeanor. This bill would require that the medical record for each episode of care for a patient identify the physician and surgeon who is responsible for the supervision of the physician assistant. The bill would delete those medical record review provisions, and, instead, require the supervising physician and surgeon to use one or more of described review mechanisms. By adding these new requirements, the violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by changing the definition of a crime. The act authorizes a physician assistant, while under prescribed supervision of a physician and surgeon, to administer or provide medication to a patient, or transmit orally, or in writing on a patient's record or in a drug order, an order to a person who may lawfully furnish the medication or medical device. The act prohibits a physician assistant from administering, providing, or issuing a drug order to a patient for Schedule II through Schedule V controlled substances without advance approval by a supervising physician and surgeon for that particular patient unless the physician assistant has completed an education course that covers controlled substances and that meets approved standards. The act requires that the medical record of any patient cared for by a physician assistant for whom a physician assistant's Schedule II drug order has been issued or carried out to be reviewed, countersigned, and dated by a supervising physician and surgeon within 7 days. This bill would establish an alternative medical records review mechanism, and would authorize the supervising physician and surgeon to use the alternative mechanism, or a sample review mechanism using a combination of the 2 described mechanisms, as specified, to ensure adequate supervision of the administration, provision, or issuance by a physician assistant of a drug order to a patient for Schedule II controlled substances. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/06/15 - Chaptered Current pdf October 06, 2015
- Enrolled 09/08/15 - Enrolled pdf September 08, 2015
- Amended 09/01/15 - Amended Assembly pdf September 01, 2015
- Amended 06/16/15 - Amended Assembly pdf June 16, 2015
- Amended 04/13/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2015
- Introduced 02/23/15 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2015
- SB337 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 536, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2497.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 2851.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
-
In Assembly. Held at Desk.
-
Ordered to the Assembly.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 2432.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (July 8).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1096.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 11.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 699.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pavley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Pavley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 337 do?
- Existing law, the Physician Assistant Practice Act, provides for regulation of physician assistants and authorizes a physician assistant to perform medical services as set forth by regulations when those services are rendered under the supervision of a licensed physician and surgeon, as specified. The act requires the supervising physician and surgeon to review, countersign, and date a sample consisting of, at a minimum, 5% of the medical records of patients treated by the physician assistant functioning under adopted protocols within 30 days of the date of treatment by the physician assistant. The act requires the supervising physician and surgeon to select for review those cases that by diagnosis, problem, treatment, or procedure represent, in his or her judgment, the most significant risk to the patient. A violation of those supervision requirements is a misdemeanor. This bill would require that the medical record for each episode of care for a patient identify the physician and surgeon who is responsible for the supervision of the physician assistant. The bill would delete those medical record review provisions, and, instead, require the supervising physician and surgeon to use one or more of described review mechanisms. By adding these new requirements, the violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by changing the definition of a crime. The act authorizes a physician assistant, while under prescribed supervision of a physician and surgeon, to administer or provide medication to a patient, or transmit orally, or in writing on a patient's record or in a drug order, an order to a person who may lawfully furnish the medication or medical device. The act prohibits a physician assistant from administering, providing, or issuing a drug order to a patient for Schedule II through Schedule V controlled substances without advance approval by a supervising physician and surgeon for that particular patient unless the physician assistant has completed an education course that covers controlled substances and that meets approved standards. The act requires that the medical record of any patient cared for by a physician assistant for whom a physician assistant's Schedule II drug order has been issued or carried out to be reviewed, countersigned, and dated by a supervising physician and surgeon within 7 days. This bill would establish an alternative medical records review mechanism, and would authorize the supervising physician and surgeon to use the alternative mechanism, or a sample review mechanism using a combination of the 2 described mechanisms, as specified, to ensure adequate supervision of the administration, provision, or issuance by a physician assistant of a drug order to a patient for Schedule II controlled substances. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 337?
- SB 337 is sponsored by Pavley.
- What is the current status of SB 337?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 337?
- Track SB 337 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 337
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 337
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →