Occupational safety and health standards: plume.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2272 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2272.
You're tracking AB 2272
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2272 — Occupational safety and health standards: plume.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board within the Department of Industrial Relations promulgates and enforces occupational safety and health standards for the state, including standards dealing with toxic materials and harmful physical agents. Under existing law, the Division of Occupational Safety and Health is required to enforce all occupational safety and health standards, as specified. A violation of these standards and regulations under specific circumstances is a crime. This bill would, by June 1, 2017, require the division to convene an advisory committee to develop a regulation that requires a health facility to evacuate or remove plume through the use of a plume scavenging system in all settings that employ techniques that involve the creation of plume and would authorize certain entities and people to be on the advisory committee, including, among others, practicing physicians and surgeons from affected specialties. The bill would require the division, in developing the regulation to do certain things, including evaluating the use of certain standards adopted by specified organizations as a benchmark. The bill would also require the division, when developing the proposed regulation, to take into consideration recommendations on the evacuation of plume from the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration or National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The bill would, by June 1, 2018, require the division to submit to the board the proposed regulation. The bill would, by July 1, 2019, require the board to adopt the proposed regulation. The bill would provide that compliance with general room ventilation standards or the use of surgical masks does not satisfy the requirements for protection from surgical plumes under these provisions. The bill would provide that the use of respirators does not satisfy the requirements for protection from surgical plumes under these provisions, except as specified. The bill would require the manufacturer of a plume scavenging system to provide evidence that the system meets specified minimum requirements when installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The bill would specify that these provisions do not limit the authority of the division to develop, or limit the authority of the board to adopt, a regulation with a broader scope or broader application than required by these provisions. By expanding the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/31/16 - Enrolled Current pdf August 31, 2016
- Amended 08/15/16 - Amended Senate pdf August 15, 2016
- Amended 08/01/16 - Amended Senate pdf August 01, 2016
- Amended 06/14/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 14, 2016
- Introduced 02/18/16 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2016
- AB2272 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 26. Page 6454.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 5341.).
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 11).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 23. Page 4858.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 5.) (May 4).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Thurmond · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Thurmond
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 47 | 21 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 52 | 26 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 33% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 33% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 44 | 18 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 23 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 29% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2272 do?
- Under existing law, the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board within the Department of Industrial Relations promulgates and enforces occupational safety and health standards for the state, including standards dealing with toxic materials and harmful physical agents. Under existing law, the Division of Occupational Safety and Health is required to enforce all occupational safety and health standards, as specified. A violation of these standards and regulations under specific circumstances is a crime. This bill would, by June 1, 2017, require the division to convene an advisory committee to develop a regulation that requires a health facility to evacuate or remove plume through the use of a plume scavenging system in all settings that employ techniques that involve the creation of plume and would authorize certain entities and people to be on the advisory committee, including, among others, practicing physicians and surgeons from affected specialties. The bill would require the division, in developing the regulation to do certain things, including evaluating the use of certain standards adopted by specified organizations as a benchmark. The bill would also require the division, when developing the proposed regulation, to take into consideration recommendations on the evacuation of plume from the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration or National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The bill would, by June 1, 2018, require the division to submit to the board the proposed regulation. The bill would, by July 1, 2019, require the board to adopt the proposed regulation. The bill would provide that compliance with general room ventilation standards or the use of surgical masks does not satisfy the requirements for protection from surgical plumes under these provisions. The bill would provide that the use of respirators does not satisfy the requirements for protection from surgical plumes under these provisions, except as specified. The bill would require the manufacturer of a plume scavenging system to provide evidence that the system meets specified minimum requirements when installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The bill would specify that these provisions do not limit the authority of the division to develop, or limit the authority of the board to adopt, a regulation with a broader scope or broader application than required by these provisions. By expanding the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2272?
- AB 2272 is sponsored by Thurmond.
- What is the current status of AB 2272?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2272?
- Track AB 2272 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2272
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2272
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →