Juveniles: prostitution.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1675 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1675.
You're tracking AB 1675
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1675 — Juveniles: prostitution.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law subjects any person under 18 years of age who commits a crime to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge that person to be a ward of the court, except as specified. Existing law authorizes a probation officer, in certain circumstances, to delineate a specific program of supervision of a minor who is alleged to have committed a crime in lieu of requesting that the prosecuting attorney file a petition to declare the minor a ward of the juvenile court. Existing law makes a minor ineligible for this program of supervision if he or she has previously participated in a program of supervision. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for a person to solicit or engage in any act of prostitution or to loiter in a public place in a manner and under circumstances manifesting the purpose and with the intent to commit prostitution. This bill would require the probation officer, in a case in which a minor is alleged to have committed those prostitution-related offenses, to delineate a specific program of supervision for the minor in lieu of requesting that the prosecuting attorney file a petition to have the minor declared a ward of the juvenile court. The bill would also allow these minors to participate in a program of supervision even if they have previously participated in a program of supervision. The bill would further require the probation officer to make a report to the county child welfare agency if the officer has reason to believe the minor is the victim of abuse or neglect, as specified. By increasing the duties of probation officers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/09/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 09, 2016
- Amended 05/12/16 - Amended Assembly pdf May 12, 2016
- Amended 04/19/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 19, 2016
- Amended 03/28/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2016
- Introduced 01/19/16 - Introduced pdf January 19, 2016
- AB1675 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 4872.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 11).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Jeff Gonzalez · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Mark Stone Voted No
Co-sponsors (1)
- Gonzalez, Jeff Republican
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 66 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1675 do?
- Existing law subjects any person under 18 years of age who commits a crime to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge that person to be a ward of the court, except as specified. Existing law authorizes a probation officer, in certain circumstances, to delineate a specific program of supervision of a minor who is alleged to have committed a crime in lieu of requesting that the prosecuting attorney file a petition to declare the minor a ward of the juvenile court. Existing law makes a minor ineligible for this program of supervision if he or she has previously participated in a program of supervision. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for a person to solicit or engage in any act of prostitution or to loiter in a public place in a manner and under circumstances manifesting the purpose and with the intent to commit prostitution. This bill would require the probation officer, in a case in which a minor is alleged to have committed those prostitution-related offenses, to delineate a specific program of supervision for the minor in lieu of requesting that the prosecuting attorney file a petition to have the minor declared a ward of the juvenile court. The bill would also allow these minors to participate in a program of supervision even if they have previously participated in a program of supervision. The bill would further require the probation officer to make a report to the county child welfare agency if the officer has reason to believe the minor is the victim of abuse or neglect, as specified. By increasing the duties of probation officers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1675?
- AB 1675 is sponsored by Gonzalez, Jeff (Republican) and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of AB 1675?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1675?
- Track AB 1675 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1675
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1675
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →