AB 645 — Electricity: California Renewables Portfolio Standard.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined, while local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law establishes the California Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) program, which expresses the intent of the Legislature that the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to an amount that equals at least 33% of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2020. Existing law requires the PUC, by January 1, 2012, to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by each retail seller for specified compliance periods, sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 25% of retail sales by December 31, 2016, and 33% of retail sales by December 31, 2020, and that retail sellers procure not less than 33% of retail sales in all subsequent years. Existing law makes the requirements of the RPS program applicable to local publicly owned electric utilities, except that the utility's governing board is responsible for implementation of those requirements, instead of the PUC, and certain enforcement authority with respect to local publicly owned electric utilities is given to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission and State Air Resources Board, instead of the PUC. This bill would additionally express the intent of the Legislature for the purposes of the RPS program that the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to an amount equal to at least 50% by December 31, 2030, and would require the PUC, by January 1, 2017, to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by each retail seller for specified compliance periods sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 50% of retail sales by December 31, 2030, and that retail sellers procure not less than 50% of retail sales in all subsequent years. The bill would require the governing boards of local publicly owned electric utilities to ensure that specified quantities of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured for specified compliance periods to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieve 50% of retail sales by December 31, 2030, and that the local publicly owned electric utilities procure not less than 50% of retail sales in all subsequent years. (2) Under existing law, a violation of the RPS program is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would expand the RPS program, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. (3) By placing additional requirements upon local publicly owned electric utilities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reasons.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/24/15 - Introduced Current pdf February 24, 2015
- AB645 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 29. Page 1846.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Rendon · Cosponsor
- Williams · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 16 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Williams
Co-sponsors (1)
- Rendon
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 48 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 52 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 31% | 65% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Nay |
| Thurmond | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Nay |
| Campos | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Bonilla | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Nay |
| Lopez | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Not Voting |
| Low | — | Nay |
| Atkins | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Nay |
| Chu | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Perea | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Nay |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Nay |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Nay |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Nay |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Nay |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 42 | 23 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 | 29 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 36% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 645 do?
- (1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined, while local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law establishes the California Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) program, which expresses the intent of the Legislature that the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to an amount that equals at least 33% of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2020. Existing law requires the PUC, by January 1, 2012, to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by each retail seller for specified compliance periods, sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 25% of retail sales by December 31, 2016, and 33% of retail sales by December 31, 2020, and that retail sellers procure not less than 33% of retail sales in all subsequent years. Existing law makes the requirements of the RPS program applicable to local publicly owned electric utilities, except that the utility's governing board is responsible for implementation of those requirements, instead of the PUC, and certain enforcement authority with respect to local publicly owned electric utilities is given to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission and State Air Resources Board, instead of the PUC. This bill would additionally express the intent of the Legislature for the purposes of the RPS program that the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to an amount equal to at least 50% by December 31, 2030, and would require the PUC, by January 1, 2017, to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by each retail seller for specified compliance periods sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 50% of retail sales by December 31, 2030, and that retail sellers procure not less than 50% of retail sales in all subsequent years. The bill would require the governing boards of local publicly owned electric utilities to ensure that specified quantities of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured for specified compliance periods to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieve 50% of retail sales by December 31, 2030, and that the local publicly owned electric utilities procure not less than 50% of retail sales in all subsequent years. (2) Under existing law, a violation of the RPS program is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would expand the RPS program, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. (3) By placing additional requirements upon local publicly owned electric utilities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reasons.
- Who sponsors AB 645?
- AB 645 is sponsored by Rendon and Williams.
- What is the current status of AB 645?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 645?
- Track AB 645 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 645
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 645
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →