California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 645 — Electricity: California Renewables Portfolio Standard.

Last action — In committee: Held under submission.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined, while local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law establishes the California Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) program, which expresses the intent of the Legislature that the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to an amount that equals at least 33% of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2020. Existing law requires the PUC, by January 1, 2012, to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by each retail seller for specified compliance periods, sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 25% of retail sales by December 31, 2016, and 33% of retail sales by December 31, 2020, and that retail sellers procure not less than 33% of retail sales in all subsequent years. Existing law makes the requirements of the RPS program applicable to local publicly owned electric utilities, except that the utility's governing board is responsible for implementation of those requirements, instead of the PUC, and certain enforcement authority with respect to local publicly owned electric utilities is given to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission and State Air Resources Board, instead of the PUC. This bill would additionally express the intent of the Legislature for the purposes of the RPS program that the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to an amount equal to at least 50% by December 31, 2030, and would require the PUC, by January 1, 2017, to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by each retail seller for specified compliance periods sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 50% of retail sales by December 31, 2030, and that retail sellers procure not less than 50% of retail sales in all subsequent years. The bill would require the governing boards of local publicly owned electric utilities to ensure that specified quantities of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured for specified compliance periods to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieve 50% of retail sales by December 31, 2030, and that the local publicly owned electric utilities procure not less than 50% of retail sales in all subsequent years. (2) Under existing law, a violation of the RPS program is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would expand the RPS program, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. (3) By placing additional requirements upon local publicly owned electric utilities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reasons.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. In committee: Held under submission.

  2. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  3. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.

  5. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 29. Page 1846.)

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).

  9. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  10. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  11. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  13. Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.

  14. From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.

  15. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Rendon · Cosponsor
  • Williams · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 16 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Williams

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Rendon

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Lara — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea

Official roll call →

Failed 25 Yea · 52 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 194803
Democratic 0400
Republican 6000
Total 255203
% of votes cast 31%65%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Nay
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Nay
Brough — Yea
Brown — Nay
Levine — Nay
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Nazarian — Nay
Quirk — Nay
Rodriguez — Nay
Thurmond — Nay
Wagner — Yea
Weber — Nay
Wood — Nay
Eggman — Nay
Cooper — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Harper — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Frazier — Nay
Burke — Nay
Campos — Nay
Salas — Nay
Bonilla — Nay
Gomez — Nay
Gordon — Nay
Gray — Nay
Hadley — Yea
Holden — Nay
Lopez — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Nay
Kim — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Low — Nay
Atkins — Nay
McCarty — Nay
Medina — Nay
Baker — Yea
Chang — Yea
Chau — Nay
Chiu — Nay
Chu — Nay
Cooley — Nay
Daly — Nay
Dodd — Nay
Mullin — Nay
O'Donnell — Nay
Obernolte — Not Voting
Perea — Nay
Rendon — Nay
Ridley-Thomas — Nay
Santiago — Nay
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Nay
Waldron — Not Voting
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Nay
Gonzalez — Nay
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Nay
Eduardo Garcia — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Roger Hernández — Nay
Travis Allen — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Nay
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Nay
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 46 Yea · 29 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 422305
Democratic 4000
Republican 0600
Total 462905
% of votes cast 58%36%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Not Voting
Harper — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Nay
O'Donnell — Yea
Perea — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chu — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Burke — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Holden — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Williams — Yea
Gray — Nay
Hadley — Nay
Chang — Nay
Salas — Not Voting
Kim — Nay
Linder — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Baker — Nay
Cooper — Not Voting
Mayes — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Frazier — Not Voting
Gatto — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2000
Unaffiliated 10300
Republican 0200
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chang — Nay
Daly — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10200
Republican 0300
Total 10500
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (15)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Ting — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Hadley — Nay
Burke — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Williams — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 645 do?
(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined, while local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law establishes the California Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) program, which expresses the intent of the Legislature that the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to an amount that equals at least 33% of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2020. Existing law requires the PUC, by January 1, 2012, to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by each retail seller for specified compliance periods, sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 25% of retail sales by December 31, 2016, and 33% of retail sales by December 31, 2020, and that retail sellers procure not less than 33% of retail sales in all subsequent years. Existing law makes the requirements of the RPS program applicable to local publicly owned electric utilities, except that the utility's governing board is responsible for implementation of those requirements, instead of the PUC, and certain enforcement authority with respect to local publicly owned electric utilities is given to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission and State Air Resources Board, instead of the PUC. This bill would additionally express the intent of the Legislature for the purposes of the RPS program that the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to an amount equal to at least 50% by December 31, 2030, and would require the PUC, by January 1, 2017, to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by each retail seller for specified compliance periods sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 50% of retail sales by December 31, 2030, and that retail sellers procure not less than 50% of retail sales in all subsequent years. The bill would require the governing boards of local publicly owned electric utilities to ensure that specified quantities of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured for specified compliance periods to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieve 50% of retail sales by December 31, 2030, and that the local publicly owned electric utilities procure not less than 50% of retail sales in all subsequent years. (2) Under existing law, a violation of the RPS program is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would expand the RPS program, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. (3) By placing additional requirements upon local publicly owned electric utilities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reasons.
Who sponsors AB 645?
AB 645 is sponsored by Rendon and Williams.
What is the current status of AB 645?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 645?
Track AB 645 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 645

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 645

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →