Health care coverage: outpatient prescription drugs.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 339 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 339.
You're tracking AB 339
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 339 — Health care coverage: outpatient prescription drugs.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 619, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law requires a health care service plan or insurer that provides prescription drug benefits and maintains one or more drug formularies to make specified information regarding the formularies available to the public and other specified entities. Existing law also specifies requirements for those plans and insurers regarding coverage and cost sharing of specified prescription drugs. This bill would prohibit the formulary or formularies for outpatient prescription drugs maintained by a health care service plan or health insurer from discouraging the enrollment of individuals with health conditions and from reducing the generosity of the benefit for enrollees or insureds with a particular condition. The bill, until January 1, 2020, would provide that the copayment, coinsurance, or any other form of cost sharing for a covered outpatient prescription drug for an individual prescription shall not exceed $250 for a supply of up to 30 days, except as specified, and would prohibit, for a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan contract or policy, the annual deductible for outpatient drugs from exceeding a specified amount. The bill would make these cost-sharing limits applicable only to covered outpatient prescription drugs that constitute essential health benefits, as defined. The bill would require a plan contract or policy to cover a single-tablet prescription drug regimen for combination antiretroviral drug treatments that are medically necessary for the treatment of AIDS/HIV, as specified. The bill, until January 1, 2020, would require a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan contract or policy to use specified definitions for each tier of a drug formulary. The bill would make related findings and declarations. This bill would require a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs to provide coverage for medically necessary prescription drugs, including nonformulary drugs determined to be medically necessary, and, for an insurer, would require copayments, coinsurance, and other cost sharing for outpatient prescription drugs to be reasonable. This bill would make these provisions applicable to nongrandfathered health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies that are offered, renewed, or amended on or after January 1, 2017. (2) Existing law requires every health care service plan that provides prescription drug benefits to maintain specified information that is required to be made available to the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care upon request. This bill would also impose these requirements on a health insurer that provides prescription drug benefits, as provided. The bill would authorize an insurer to require step therapy, as defined, when more than one drug is appropriate for the treatment of a medical condition, subject to specified requirements. The bill, with regard to an insured changing policies, would prohibit a new insurer from requiring the insured to repeat step therapy when that person is already being treated for a medical condition by a prescription drug, as specified. For plan years commencing on or after January 1, 2017, the bill, except as specified, would require a plan or insurer that provides essential health benefits to allow an enrollee or insured to access his or her prescription drug benefits at an in-network retail pharmacy, and would authorize a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan or insurer to charge an enrollee or insured a different cost sharing for obtaining a covered drug at a retail pharmacy, and would require that cost-sharing amount to count towards the plan's or insurer's annual out-of-pocket limitation, as specified. This bill, commencing January 1, 2017, would require a plan or insurer to maintain a pharmacy and therapeutics committee that is responsible for developing, maintaining, and overseeing any drug formulary list, as provided. The bill would require the committee to, among other things, evaluate and analyze treatment protocols and procedures related to the plan's or insurer's drug formulary at least annually. (3) Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care and the Department of Insurance to jointly develop a standard formulary template by January 1, 2017, and requires plans and insurers to use that template to display formularies, as specified. Existing law requires the standard formulary template to include specified information. This bill would require the standard formulary template to include additional specified information, including which medications are covered, including both generic and brand name. (4) Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements relative to health care service plans would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/08/15 - Chaptered Current pdf October 08, 2015
- Enrolled 09/16/15 - Enrolled pdf September 16, 2015
- Amended 09/04/15 - Amended Senate pdf September 04, 2015
- Amended 09/01/15 - Amended Senate pdf September 01, 2015
- Amended 07/16/15 - Amended Senate pdf July 16, 2015
- Amended 07/07/15 - Amended Senate pdf July 07, 2015
- Amended 06/24/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 24, 2015
- Amended 06/01/15 - Amended Assembly pdf June 01, 2015
- Amended 05/20/15 - Amended Assembly pdf May 20, 2015
- Amended 05/04/15 - Amended Assembly pdf May 04, 2015
- Amended 04/07/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 07, 2015
- Introduced 02/13/15 - Introduced pdf February 13, 2015
- AB339 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 619, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 50. Noes 27. Page 3138.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 2694.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (July 15).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 30. Page 1867.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1613.)
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (April 28).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Atkins · Cosponsor
- Gordon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gordon
Co-sponsors (1)
- Atkins
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 45 | 23 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 50 | 27 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 34% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Not Voting |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 33% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Nay |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 44 | 24 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 48 | 30 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 38% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Not Voting |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Nay |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Nay |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Not Voting |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 26% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 339 do?
- (1) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law requires a health care service plan or insurer that provides prescription drug benefits and maintains one or more drug formularies to make specified information regarding the formularies available to the public and other specified entities. Existing law also specifies requirements for those plans and insurers regarding coverage and cost sharing of specified prescription drugs. This bill would prohibit the formulary or formularies for outpatient prescription drugs maintained by a health care service plan or health insurer from discouraging the enrollment of individuals with health conditions and from reducing the generosity of the benefit for enrollees or insureds with a particular condition. The bill, until January 1, 2020, would provide that the copayment, coinsurance, or any other form of cost sharing for a covered outpatient prescription drug for an individual prescription shall not exceed $250 for a supply of up to 30 days, except as specified, and would prohibit, for a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan contract or policy, the annual deductible for outpatient drugs from exceeding a specified amount. The bill would make these cost-sharing limits applicable only to covered outpatient prescription drugs that constitute essential health benefits, as defined. The bill would require a plan contract or policy to cover a single-tablet prescription drug regimen for combination antiretroviral drug treatments that are medically necessary for the treatment of AIDS/HIV, as specified. The bill, until January 1, 2020, would require a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan contract or policy to use specified definitions for each tier of a drug formulary. The bill would make related findings and declarations. This bill would require a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs to provide coverage for medically necessary prescription drugs, including nonformulary drugs determined to be medically necessary, and, for an insurer, would require copayments, coinsurance, and other cost sharing for outpatient prescription drugs to be reasonable. This bill would make these provisions applicable to nongrandfathered health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies that are offered, renewed, or amended on or after January 1, 2017. (2) Existing law requires every health care service plan that provides prescription drug benefits to maintain specified information that is required to be made available to the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care upon request. This bill would also impose these requirements on a health insurer that provides prescription drug benefits, as provided. The bill would authorize an insurer to require step therapy, as defined, when more than one drug is appropriate for the treatment of a medical condition, subject to specified requirements. The bill, with regard to an insured changing policies, would prohibit a new insurer from requiring the insured to repeat step therapy when that person is already being treated for a medical condition by a prescription drug, as specified. For plan years commencing on or after January 1, 2017, the bill, except as specified, would require a plan or insurer that provides essential health benefits to allow an enrollee or insured to access his or her prescription drug benefits at an in-network retail pharmacy, and would authorize a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan or insurer to charge an enrollee or insured a different cost sharing for obtaining a covered drug at a retail pharmacy, and would require that cost-sharing amount to count towards the plan's or insurer's annual out-of-pocket limitation, as specified. This bill, commencing January 1, 2017, would require a plan or insurer to maintain a pharmacy and therapeutics committee that is responsible for developing, maintaining, and overseeing any drug formulary list, as provided. The bill would require the committee to, among other things, evaluate and analyze treatment protocols and procedures related to the plan's or insurer's drug formulary at least annually. (3) Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care and the Department of Insurance to jointly develop a standard formulary template by January 1, 2017, and requires plans and insurers to use that template to display formularies, as specified. Existing law requires the standard formulary template to include specified information. This bill would require the standard formulary template to include additional specified information, including which medications are covered, including both generic and brand name. (4) Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements relative to health care service plans would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 339?
- AB 339 is sponsored by Atkins and Gordon.
- What is the current status of AB 339?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 339?
- Track AB 339 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 339
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 339
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →