California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 339 — Health care coverage: outpatient prescription drugs.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 619, Statutes of 2015.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2015. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law requires a health care service plan or insurer that provides prescription drug benefits and maintains one or more drug formularies to make specified information regarding the formularies available to the public and other specified entities. Existing law also specifies requirements for those plans and insurers regarding coverage and cost sharing of specified prescription drugs. This bill would prohibit the formulary or formularies for outpatient prescription drugs maintained by a health care service plan or health insurer from discouraging the enrollment of individuals with health conditions and from reducing the generosity of the benefit for enrollees or insureds with a particular condition. The bill, until January 1, 2020, would provide that the copayment, coinsurance, or any other form of cost sharing for a covered outpatient prescription drug for an individual prescription shall not exceed $250 for a supply of up to 30 days, except as specified, and would prohibit, for a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan contract or policy, the annual deductible for outpatient drugs from exceeding a specified amount. The bill would make these cost-sharing limits applicable only to covered outpatient prescription drugs that constitute essential health benefits, as defined. The bill would require a plan contract or policy to cover a single-tablet prescription drug regimen for combination antiretroviral drug treatments that are medically necessary for the treatment of AIDS/HIV, as specified. The bill, until January 1, 2020, would require a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan contract or policy to use specified definitions for each tier of a drug formulary. The bill would make related findings and declarations. This bill would require a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs to provide coverage for medically necessary prescription drugs, including nonformulary drugs determined to be medically necessary, and, for an insurer, would require copayments, coinsurance, and other cost sharing for outpatient prescription drugs to be reasonable. This bill would make these provisions applicable to nongrandfathered health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies that are offered, renewed, or amended on or after January 1, 2017. (2) Existing law requires every health care service plan that provides prescription drug benefits to maintain specified information that is required to be made available to the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care upon request. This bill would also impose these requirements on a health insurer that provides prescription drug benefits, as provided. The bill would authorize an insurer to require step therapy, as defined, when more than one drug is appropriate for the treatment of a medical condition, subject to specified requirements. The bill, with regard to an insured changing policies, would prohibit a new insurer from requiring the insured to repeat step therapy when that person is already being treated for a medical condition by a prescription drug, as specified. For plan years commencing on or after January 1, 2017, the bill, except as specified, would require a plan or insurer that provides essential health benefits to allow an enrollee or insured to access his or her prescription drug benefits at an in-network retail pharmacy, and would authorize a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan or insurer to charge an enrollee or insured a different cost sharing for obtaining a covered drug at a retail pharmacy, and would require that cost-sharing amount to count towards the plan's or insurer's annual out-of-pocket limitation, as specified. This bill, commencing January 1, 2017, would require a plan or insurer to maintain a pharmacy and therapeutics committee that is responsible for developing, maintaining, and overseeing any drug formulary list, as provided. The bill would require the committee to, among other things, evaluate and analyze treatment protocols and procedures related to the plan's or insurer's drug formulary at least annually. (3) Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care and the Department of Insurance to jointly develop a standard formulary template by January 1, 2017, and requires plans and insurers to use that template to display formularies, as specified. Existing law requires the standard formulary template to include specified information. This bill would require the standard formulary template to include additional specified information, including which medications are covered, including both generic and brand name. (4) Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements relative to health care service plans would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 619, Statutes of 2015.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 50. Noes 27. Page 3138.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 2694.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  9. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  10. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 27).

  11. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  12. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (July 15).

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  15. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  16. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  17. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  18. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  19. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 30. Page 1867.)

  20. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  21. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  22. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).

  23. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 1613.)

  24. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  26. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  27. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  28. Read second time and amended.

  29. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (April 28).

  30. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  31. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  32. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  33. From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.

  34. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Atkins · Cosponsor
  • Gordon · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 12 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Gordon

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Atkins

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 50 Yea · 27 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452303
Democratic 4000
Republican 1400
Total 502703
% of votes cast 63%34%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Nay
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Williams — Not Voting
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Not Voting
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Burke — Yea
Campos — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Harper — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mayes — Nay
Chu — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Gray — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Chang — Nay
Baker — Nay
Kim — Nay
Steinorth — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Gomez — Yea
Hadley — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 25 Yea · 13 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231202
Democratic 2100
Total 251302
% of votes cast 63%33%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Monning — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Cannella — Nay
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
De León — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Bates — Nay
Huff — Nay
Moorlach — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5200
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Nay
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Nay

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Bates — Yea
Nielsen — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 48 Yea · 30 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 442402
Democratic 4000
Republican 0600
Total 483002
% of votes cast 60%38%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brown — Yea
Holden — Yea
Kim — Nay
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Nay
McCarty — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Perea — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Thurmond — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Nay
Dodd — Yea
Burke — Yea
Campos — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gray — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Harper — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Nay
Medina — Yea
Chau — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Brough — Nay
Chang — Nay
Dababneh — Nay
Steinorth — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Frazier — Not Voting
Gonzalez — Yea
Hadley — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2000
Unaffiliated 10300
Republican 0200
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Holden — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Daly — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Weber — Yea
Chang — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Gomez — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11302
Republican 0200
Democratic 1000
Total 12502
% of votes cast 63%26%0%11%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Nazarian — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Not Voting
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Burke — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Wood — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 339 do?
(1) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law requires a health care service plan or insurer that provides prescription drug benefits and maintains one or more drug formularies to make specified information regarding the formularies available to the public and other specified entities. Existing law also specifies requirements for those plans and insurers regarding coverage and cost sharing of specified prescription drugs. This bill would prohibit the formulary or formularies for outpatient prescription drugs maintained by a health care service plan or health insurer from discouraging the enrollment of individuals with health conditions and from reducing the generosity of the benefit for enrollees or insureds with a particular condition. The bill, until January 1, 2020, would provide that the copayment, coinsurance, or any other form of cost sharing for a covered outpatient prescription drug for an individual prescription shall not exceed $250 for a supply of up to 30 days, except as specified, and would prohibit, for a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan contract or policy, the annual deductible for outpatient drugs from exceeding a specified amount. The bill would make these cost-sharing limits applicable only to covered outpatient prescription drugs that constitute essential health benefits, as defined. The bill would require a plan contract or policy to cover a single-tablet prescription drug regimen for combination antiretroviral drug treatments that are medically necessary for the treatment of AIDS/HIV, as specified. The bill, until January 1, 2020, would require a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan contract or policy to use specified definitions for each tier of a drug formulary. The bill would make related findings and declarations. This bill would require a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs to provide coverage for medically necessary prescription drugs, including nonformulary drugs determined to be medically necessary, and, for an insurer, would require copayments, coinsurance, and other cost sharing for outpatient prescription drugs to be reasonable. This bill would make these provisions applicable to nongrandfathered health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies that are offered, renewed, or amended on or after January 1, 2017. (2) Existing law requires every health care service plan that provides prescription drug benefits to maintain specified information that is required to be made available to the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care upon request. This bill would also impose these requirements on a health insurer that provides prescription drug benefits, as provided. The bill would authorize an insurer to require step therapy, as defined, when more than one drug is appropriate for the treatment of a medical condition, subject to specified requirements. The bill, with regard to an insured changing policies, would prohibit a new insurer from requiring the insured to repeat step therapy when that person is already being treated for a medical condition by a prescription drug, as specified. For plan years commencing on or after January 1, 2017, the bill, except as specified, would require a plan or insurer that provides essential health benefits to allow an enrollee or insured to access his or her prescription drug benefits at an in-network retail pharmacy, and would authorize a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan or insurer to charge an enrollee or insured a different cost sharing for obtaining a covered drug at a retail pharmacy, and would require that cost-sharing amount to count towards the plan's or insurer's annual out-of-pocket limitation, as specified. This bill, commencing January 1, 2017, would require a plan or insurer to maintain a pharmacy and therapeutics committee that is responsible for developing, maintaining, and overseeing any drug formulary list, as provided. The bill would require the committee to, among other things, evaluate and analyze treatment protocols and procedures related to the plan's or insurer's drug formulary at least annually. (3) Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care and the Department of Insurance to jointly develop a standard formulary template by January 1, 2017, and requires plans and insurers to use that template to display formularies, as specified. Existing law requires the standard formulary template to include specified information. This bill would require the standard formulary template to include additional specified information, including which medications are covered, including both generic and brand name. (4) Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements relative to health care service plans would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 339?
AB 339 is sponsored by Atkins and Gordon.
What is the current status of AB 339?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 13, 2015. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 339?
Track AB 339 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 339

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 339

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →