SB 2 — Property taxation: exemptions: veterans' organizations.
Last action — July 13 set for first hearing. Placed on REV. & TAX. suspense file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing property tax law establishes a veterans' organization exemption under which property is exempt from taxation if, among other things, that property is used exclusively for charitable purposes and is owned by a veterans' organization. This bill would provide that the veterans' organization exemption shall not be denied to a property on the basis that the property is used for fraternal, lodge, or social club purposes, and would make specific findings and declarations in that regard. The bill would also provide that the exemption shall not apply to any portion of a property that consists of a bar where alcoholic beverages are served. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/06/15 - Amended Senate Current pdf April 06, 2015
- Introduced 12/01/14 - Introduced pdf December 01, 2014
- SB2 View text html
Action History
-
July 13 set for first hearing. Placed on REV. & TAX. suspense file.
-
June 29 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1189.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1145.) (May 28).
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
April 27 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 618.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Set for hearing April 15.
-
April 8 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 8.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 1.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Chávez · Cosponsor
- Achadjian · Cosponsor
- Anderson · Primary
- Baker · Cosponsor
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Bigelow · Cosponsor
- Brough · Cosponsor
- Brown · Cosponsor
- Chang · Cosponsor
- Cooley · Cosponsor
- Galgiani · Cosponsor
- James Gallagher · Cosponsor
- Fuller · Cosponsor
- Hadley · Cosponsor
- Shannon Grove · Cosponsor
- Harper · Cosponsor
- Huff · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Linder · Cosponsor
- Megan Dahle · Cosponsor
- Benjamin Allen · Cosponsor
- Maienschein · Cosponsor
- Mathis · Cosponsor
- McCarty · Cosponsor
- Melendez · Cosponsor
- Jim Patterson · Cosponsor
- Morrell · Cosponsor
- Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Nielsen · Cosponsor
- Olsen · Cosponsor
- Pan · Cosponsor
- Steinorth · Cosponsor
- Vidak · Cosponsor
- Waldron · Cosponsor
- Wagner · Cosponsor
- Wilk · Cosponsor
- Brian W. Jones · Cosponsor
- Cristina Garcia · Cosponsor
- Beth Gaines · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Cosponsor
- Beth Gaines · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 40 co-sponsors · 81 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Anderson
Co-sponsors (40)
- Chávez
- Achadjian
- Baker
- Bates
- Bigelow
- Brough
- Brown
- Chang
- Cooley
- Galgiani
- Gallagher, James Republican
- Fuller
- Hadley
- Grove, Shannon Republican
- Harper
- Huff
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Linder
- Dahle, Megan Republican
- Allen, Benjamin Democratic
- Maienschein
- Mathis
- McCarty
- Melendez
- Jim Patterson
- Morrell
- Nguyen
- Nielsen
- Olsen
- Pan
- Steinorth
- Vidak
- Waldron
- Wagner
- Wilk
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
- Cristina Garcia
- Beth Gaines
- Mark Stone
- Beth Gaines
Not signed on (81)
81 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 81 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2 do?
- Existing property tax law establishes a veterans' organization exemption under which property is exempt from taxation if, among other things, that property is used exclusively for charitable purposes and is owned by a veterans' organization. This bill would provide that the veterans' organization exemption shall not be denied to a property on the basis that the property is used for fraternal, lodge, or social club purposes, and would make specific findings and declarations in that regard. The bill would also provide that the exemption shall not apply to any portion of a property that consists of a bar where alcoholic beverages are served. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
- Who sponsors SB 2?
- SB 2 is sponsored by Chávez, Achadjian, Anderson, Baker, Bates, Bigelow, Brough, Brown, Chang, Cooley, Galgiani, Gallagher, James (Republican), Fuller, Hadley, Grove, Shannon (Republican), Harper, Huff, Lackey, Tom (Republican), Linder, Dahle, Megan (Republican), Allen, Benjamin (Democratic), Maienschein, Mathis, McCarty, Melendez, Jim Patterson, Morrell, Nguyen, Nielsen, Olsen, Pan, Steinorth, Vidak, Waldron, Wagner, Wilk, Jones, Brian W. (Republican), Cristina Garcia, Beth Gaines, and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of SB 2?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 2?
- Track SB 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →