SB 686 — Public postsecondary education: Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act.
Last action — Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, known as the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, contains provisions relating to employer-employee relations between the state and the employees of state institutions of higher education, including the University of California and the California State University, as well as the Hastings College of the Law. These provisions assign major responsibilities for implementation to the Public Employment Relations Board. The Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act provides specified rights, provisions, and definitions for supervisory employees, as defined, of the University of California and the Hastings College of the Law, and excludes those employees from the general provisions of the act. This bill would provide that the general provisions of the act apply, instead of the specified rights, provisions, and definitions for supervisory employees, to supervisory employees who are employed as sworn peace officers by the University of California or the Hastings College of the Law, except as specified. The bill would prohibit supervisory employees who are employed as sworn peace officers by the University of California or the Hastings College of the Law from being placed in the same collective bargaining unit as nonsupervisory employees.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/03/15 - Enrolled Current pdf September 03, 2015
- Amended 04/06/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 06, 2015
- Introduced 02/27/15 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2015
- SB686 View text html
Action History
-
Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 2785.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 27).
-
July 15 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 13. Page 1209.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1158.) (May 28).
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
April 27 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 593.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after April 1.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Pan
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 19 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 24 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 30% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Not Voting |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 15% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 12 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 13 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 33% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Not Voting |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 686 do?
- Existing law, known as the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, contains provisions relating to employer-employee relations between the state and the employees of state institutions of higher education, including the University of California and the California State University, as well as the Hastings College of the Law. These provisions assign major responsibilities for implementation to the Public Employment Relations Board. The Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act provides specified rights, provisions, and definitions for supervisory employees, as defined, of the University of California and the Hastings College of the Law, and excludes those employees from the general provisions of the act. This bill would provide that the general provisions of the act apply, instead of the specified rights, provisions, and definitions for supervisory employees, to supervisory employees who are employed as sworn peace officers by the University of California or the Hastings College of the Law, except as specified. The bill would prohibit supervisory employees who are employed as sworn peace officers by the University of California or the Hastings College of the Law from being placed in the same collective bargaining unit as nonsupervisory employees.
- Who sponsors SB 686?
- SB 686 is sponsored by Pan.
- What is the current status of SB 686?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 686?
- Track SB 686 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 686
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 686
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →