AB 2180 — Land use: development project review.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 566, Statutes of 2016.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The Permit Streamlining Act within the Planning and Zoning Law requires the lead agency that has the principal responsibility for approving a development project, as defined, to approve or disapprove the project within 180 days from the date of certification of an environmental impact report. Existing law requires approval or disapproval within 90 days from the date of certification if at least 49% of the units within the development project are affordable to very low or low-income households. Existing law also requires approval or disapproval within 60 days from the date of the adoption of a negative declaration, or the determination by the lead agency that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. This bill would require approval or disapproval within 120 days from the date of certification of an environmental impact report when the development project consists of either residential units only or mixed use development in which the nonresidential uses are less than 50% of the total square footage of the development, among other conditions. The Planning and Zoning Law requires any public agency that is a responsible agency for a development project to approve or disapprove a development project that has been approved by the lead agency within the longer of 180 days from the date on which the lead agency has approved the project or within 180 days of the date on which the completed application for the development project has been accepted as complete by that responsible agency. This bill would, for a public agency other than the California Coastal Commission, reduce each time period to within 90 days when the development project consists of either residential units only or mixed use development in which the nonresidential uses are less than 50% of the total square footage of the development and other conditions are met. By increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/24/16 - Chaptered Current pdf September 24, 2016
- Enrolled 08/31/16 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2016
- Amended 08/17/16 - Amended Senate pdf August 17, 2016
- Amended 03/31/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 31, 2016
- Introduced 02/18/16 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2016
- AB2180 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 566, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6454.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 1. Page 5358.).
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 11).
-
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 0. Page 4959.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (May 18).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
-
Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Ting · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ting
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 3% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Not Voting |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 58 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 67 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 0% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Not Voting |
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Brown | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Not Voting |
| Dodd | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Not Voting |
| Ting | — | Not Voting |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2180 do?
- The Permit Streamlining Act within the Planning and Zoning Law requires the lead agency that has the principal responsibility for approving a development project, as defined, to approve or disapprove the project within 180 days from the date of certification of an environmental impact report. Existing law requires approval or disapproval within 90 days from the date of certification if at least 49% of the units within the development project are affordable to very low or low-income households. Existing law also requires approval or disapproval within 60 days from the date of the adoption of a negative declaration, or the determination by the lead agency that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. This bill would require approval or disapproval within 120 days from the date of certification of an environmental impact report when the development project consists of either residential units only or mixed use development in which the nonresidential uses are less than 50% of the total square footage of the development, among other conditions. The Planning and Zoning Law requires any public agency that is a responsible agency for a development project to approve or disapprove a development project that has been approved by the lead agency within the longer of 180 days from the date on which the lead agency has approved the project or within 180 days of the date on which the completed application for the development project has been accepted as complete by that responsible agency. This bill would, for a public agency other than the California Coastal Commission, reduce each time period to within 90 days when the development project consists of either residential units only or mixed use development in which the nonresidential uses are less than 50% of the total square footage of the development and other conditions are met. By increasing the duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2180?
- AB 2180 is sponsored by Ting.
- What is the current status of AB 2180?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2180?
- Track AB 2180 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2180
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2180
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →