AB 285 — Professions and vocations: registration.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 295, Statutes of 2015.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law defines and regulates the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants, as those terms are defined. Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to be registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located, which is deemed the primary place of registration, and in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required, which is deemed a secondary place of registration. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor. Existing law prohibits a legal document assistant from providing self-help service, as defined, for compensation unless he or she is registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required. Existing law requires a county clerk to, among other things, issue an identification card to each registered legal document assistant and unlawful detainer assistant. This bill would delete the requirement that a legal document assistant or an unlawful detainer assistant be registered in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required. The bill would also specify that a legal document assistant registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in which he or she maintains a branch office may provide self-help services in any part of this state. The bill would also delete references to primary and secondary places of registration. (2) Existing law requires an applicant for registration as a legal document assistant to meet specified educational requirements. Existing law requires the county clerk to, among other things, return an application and fee to an applicant, along with notice indicating the reason for the denial and the method of appeal, if the clerk finds that the applicant has not complied with the educational requirements for registration as a legal document assistant. This bill would additionally require an applicant for renewal of registration as a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to complete 15 hours of continuing legal education courses that meet specified requirements relating to attorneys during the 2-year period preceding renewal. The bill would require the applicant to state on his or her application for renewal, under penalty of perjury, that the applicant has completed the required continuing legal education courses. The bill would require the county clerk to return an application and fee to an applicant for renewal who fails to comply with this requirement. By revising the duties of county clerks with respect to the renewal of registration of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants, and by expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law provides for the renewal of registration of a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and requires the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a legal document assistant or an unlawful detainer assistant renewing his or her registration provided that there is no lapse in the period of registration. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of process servers and professional photocopiers, as those terms are defined, including requiring a process server or professional photocopier to be registered, as specified. Existing law provides for the renewal of registration under these provisions and requires the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a process server or professional photocopier renewing his or her registration provided that there is no lapse in the period of registration. This bill would instead require the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a registrant in any of the above-described professions, provided that the applicant is renewing registration in the same county in which he or she was previously registered and there is no lapse of three years or more in the period of registration. By changing the process by which county clerks renew registration of legal document assistants, unlawful detainer assistants, process servers, and professional photocopiers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law requires a registered legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include his or her name, business address, telephone number, registration number, expiration date of the registration, and county of registration in any solicitation or advertisement, and on any papers or documents prepared or used by the registrant. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor. This bill would delete the requirement that the expiration date of the registration appear on any papers or documents prepared or used by the registrant. The bill would also require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include his or her name, business address, telephone number, registration number, expiration date of the registration, and county of registration on a written contract for services required to be provided to a client, on any Internet Web site maintained by the registrant, and in any solicitation, advertisement, document, or correspondence prepared or used by the registrant in electronic form. By changing the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law prescribes the proper county of venue in civil actions. This bill, notwithstanding any other law, would provide that the proper venue in an action between a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and his or her client is the county in which the client has his or her primary residence. The bill would require a written contract entered into on or after January 1, 2016, between the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and his or her client to include a statement to this effect and would make a contract voidable at the client's option for failure to comply with this requirement. (6) Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to make specified statements to a prospective client at the first in-person or telephonic solicitation indicating that he or she is not a lawyer. Existing law requires the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to make similar statements if the prospective client initiates the first contact and authorizes the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to have the prospective client read and sign a "Notice to Consumer" indicating that the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant has provided this information. This bill would recast these provisions and require a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to provide this information at the first contact with the prospective client, regardless of which party initiates. The bill would also require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to provide the "Notice to Consumer," as specified, after making these oral statements and before entering into a contract or agreement for services or accepting compensation and to translate the "Notice to Consumer" into the language principally used in any oral sales presentation or negotiation. The bill would additionally require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to inform the prospective client of the county in which he or she, or the partnership or corporation, is registered, the registration number assigned by the county, and the expiration date of his or her, or of the partnership's or corporation's, current registration period. The bill would also require the written contract between the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include the contact information of the county clerk's office for the county in which the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant is registered, as specified. The bill would require the "Notice to Consumer" to include this information. (7) This bill would repeal the provisions regulating the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants as of January 1, 2021. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/21/15 - Chaptered Current pdf September 21, 2015
- Enrolled 09/03/15 - Enrolled pdf September 03, 2015
- Amended 07/02/15 - Amended Senate pdf July 02, 2015
- Amended 06/29/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 29, 2015
- Amended 06/19/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 19, 2015
- Amended 04/23/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 23, 2015
- Amended 03/26/15 - Amended Assembly pdf March 26, 2015
- Introduced 02/11/15 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2015
- AB285 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 295, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 2670.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2196.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1594.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 20).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 21).
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- James Gallagher · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gallagher, James Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 66 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 285 do?
- (1) Existing law defines and regulates the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants, as those terms are defined. Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to be registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located, which is deemed the primary place of registration, and in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required, which is deemed a secondary place of registration. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor. Existing law prohibits a legal document assistant from providing self-help service, as defined, for compensation unless he or she is registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required. Existing law requires a county clerk to, among other things, issue an identification card to each registered legal document assistant and unlawful detainer assistant. This bill would delete the requirement that a legal document assistant or an unlawful detainer assistant be registered in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required. The bill would also specify that a legal document assistant registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in which he or she maintains a branch office may provide self-help services in any part of this state. The bill would also delete references to primary and secondary places of registration. (2) Existing law requires an applicant for registration as a legal document assistant to meet specified educational requirements. Existing law requires the county clerk to, among other things, return an application and fee to an applicant, along with notice indicating the reason for the denial and the method of appeal, if the clerk finds that the applicant has not complied with the educational requirements for registration as a legal document assistant. This bill would additionally require an applicant for renewal of registration as a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to complete 15 hours of continuing legal education courses that meet specified requirements relating to attorneys during the 2-year period preceding renewal. The bill would require the applicant to state on his or her application for renewal, under penalty of perjury, that the applicant has completed the required continuing legal education courses. The bill would require the county clerk to return an application and fee to an applicant for renewal who fails to comply with this requirement. By revising the duties of county clerks with respect to the renewal of registration of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants, and by expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law provides for the renewal of registration of a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and requires the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a legal document assistant or an unlawful detainer assistant renewing his or her registration provided that there is no lapse in the period of registration. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of process servers and professional photocopiers, as those terms are defined, including requiring a process server or professional photocopier to be registered, as specified. Existing law provides for the renewal of registration under these provisions and requires the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a process server or professional photocopier renewing his or her registration provided that there is no lapse in the period of registration. This bill would instead require the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a registrant in any of the above-described professions, provided that the applicant is renewing registration in the same county in which he or she was previously registered and there is no lapse of three years or more in the period of registration. By changing the process by which county clerks renew registration of legal document assistants, unlawful detainer assistants, process servers, and professional photocopiers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law requires a registered legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include his or her name, business address, telephone number, registration number, expiration date of the registration, and county of registration in any solicitation or advertisement, and on any papers or documents prepared or used by the registrant. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor. This bill would delete the requirement that the expiration date of the registration appear on any papers or documents prepared or used by the registrant. The bill would also require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include his or her name, business address, telephone number, registration number, expiration date of the registration, and county of registration on a written contract for services required to be provided to a client, on any Internet Web site maintained by the registrant, and in any solicitation, advertisement, document, or correspondence prepared or used by the registrant in electronic form. By changing the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law prescribes the proper county of venue in civil actions. This bill, notwithstanding any other law, would provide that the proper venue in an action between a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and his or her client is the county in which the client has his or her primary residence. The bill would require a written contract entered into on or after January 1, 2016, between the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and his or her client to include a statement to this effect and would make a contract voidable at the client's option for failure to comply with this requirement. (6) Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to make specified statements to a prospective client at the first in-person or telephonic solicitation indicating that he or she is not a lawyer. Existing law requires the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to make similar statements if the prospective client initiates the first contact and authorizes the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to have the prospective client read and sign a "Notice to Consumer" indicating that the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant has provided this information. This bill would recast these provisions and require a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to provide this information at the first contact with the prospective client, regardless of which party initiates. The bill would also require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to provide the "Notice to Consumer," as specified, after making these oral statements and before entering into a contract or agreement for services or accepting compensation and to translate the "Notice to Consumer" into the language principally used in any oral sales presentation or negotiation. The bill would additionally require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to inform the prospective client of the county in which he or she, or the partnership or corporation, is registered, the registration number assigned by the county, and the expiration date of his or her, or of the partnership's or corporation's, current registration period. The bill would also require the written contract between the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include the contact information of the county clerk's office for the county in which the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant is registered, as specified. The bill would require the "Notice to Consumer" to include this information. (7) This bill would repeal the provisions regulating the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants as of January 1, 2021. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 285?
- AB 285 is sponsored by Gallagher, James (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 285?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 285?
- Track AB 285 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 285
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 285
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →