California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

AB 285 — Professions and vocations: registration.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 295, Statutes of 2015.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2015. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law defines and regulates the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants, as those terms are defined. Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to be registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located, which is deemed the primary place of registration, and in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required, which is deemed a secondary place of registration. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor. Existing law prohibits a legal document assistant from providing self-help service, as defined, for compensation unless he or she is registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required. Existing law requires a county clerk to, among other things, issue an identification card to each registered legal document assistant and unlawful detainer assistant. This bill would delete the requirement that a legal document assistant or an unlawful detainer assistant be registered in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required. The bill would also specify that a legal document assistant registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in which he or she maintains a branch office may provide self-help services in any part of this state. The bill would also delete references to primary and secondary places of registration. (2) Existing law requires an applicant for registration as a legal document assistant to meet specified educational requirements. Existing law requires the county clerk to, among other things, return an application and fee to an applicant, along with notice indicating the reason for the denial and the method of appeal, if the clerk finds that the applicant has not complied with the educational requirements for registration as a legal document assistant. This bill would additionally require an applicant for renewal of registration as a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to complete 15 hours of continuing legal education courses that meet specified requirements relating to attorneys during the 2-year period preceding renewal. The bill would require the applicant to state on his or her application for renewal, under penalty of perjury, that the applicant has completed the required continuing legal education courses. The bill would require the county clerk to return an application and fee to an applicant for renewal who fails to comply with this requirement. By revising the duties of county clerks with respect to the renewal of registration of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants, and by expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law provides for the renewal of registration of a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and requires the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a legal document assistant or an unlawful detainer assistant renewing his or her registration provided that there is no lapse in the period of registration. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of process servers and professional photocopiers, as those terms are defined, including requiring a process server or professional photocopier to be registered, as specified. Existing law provides for the renewal of registration under these provisions and requires the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a process server or professional photocopier renewing his or her registration provided that there is no lapse in the period of registration. This bill would instead require the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a registrant in any of the above-described professions, provided that the applicant is renewing registration in the same county in which he or she was previously registered and there is no lapse of three years or more in the period of registration. By changing the process by which county clerks renew registration of legal document assistants, unlawful detainer assistants, process servers, and professional photocopiers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law requires a registered legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include his or her name, business address, telephone number, registration number, expiration date of the registration, and county of registration in any solicitation or advertisement, and on any papers or documents prepared or used by the registrant. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor. This bill would delete the requirement that the expiration date of the registration appear on any papers or documents prepared or used by the registrant. The bill would also require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include his or her name, business address, telephone number, registration number, expiration date of the registration, and county of registration on a written contract for services required to be provided to a client, on any Internet Web site maintained by the registrant, and in any solicitation, advertisement, document, or correspondence prepared or used by the registrant in electronic form. By changing the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law prescribes the proper county of venue in civil actions. This bill, notwithstanding any other law, would provide that the proper venue in an action between a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and his or her client is the county in which the client has his or her primary residence. The bill would require a written contract entered into on or after January 1, 2016, between the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and his or her client to include a statement to this effect and would make a contract voidable at the client's option for failure to comply with this requirement. (6) Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to make specified statements to a prospective client at the first in-person or telephonic solicitation indicating that he or she is not a lawyer. Existing law requires the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to make similar statements if the prospective client initiates the first contact and authorizes the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to have the prospective client read and sign a "Notice to Consumer" indicating that the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant has provided this information. This bill would recast these provisions and require a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to provide this information at the first contact with the prospective client, regardless of which party initiates. The bill would also require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to provide the "Notice to Consumer," as specified, after making these oral statements and before entering into a contract or agreement for services or accepting compensation and to translate the "Notice to Consumer" into the language principally used in any oral sales presentation or negotiation. The bill would additionally require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to inform the prospective client of the county in which he or she, or the partnership or corporation, is registered, the registration number assigned by the county, and the expiration date of his or her, or of the partnership's or corporation's, current registration period. The bill would also require the written contract between the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include the contact information of the county clerk's office for the county in which the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant is registered, as specified. The bill would require the "Notice to Consumer" to include this information. (7) This bill would repeal the provisions regulating the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants as of January 1, 2021. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 295, Statutes of 2015.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 2670.).

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2196.).

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  12. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  14. Referred to Com. on JUD.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1594.)

  17. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  18. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 20).

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  21. Read second time and amended.

  22. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 21).

  23. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  24. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

  25. Referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. GOV.

  26. From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.

  27. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71000
Democratic 4000
Republican 5000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Burke — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Chang — Yea
Harper — Yea
Chau — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Kim — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Perea — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Gray — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wood — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35002
Democratic 3000
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 76 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 66004
Democratic 4000
Republican 6000
Total 76004
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Baker — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Not Voting
Nazarian — Yea
Perea — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Campos — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Low — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mayes — Yea
Lopez — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Harper — Not Voting
Holden — Yea
Kim — Yea
Levine — Yea
Burke — Yea
Bloom — Not Voting
Chang — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 15 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12001
Democratic 2000
Republican 1001
Total 15002
% of votes cast 88%0%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Holden — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Chang — Yea
Daly — Not Voting
Wagner — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 285 do?
(1) Existing law defines and regulates the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants, as those terms are defined. Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to be registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located, which is deemed the primary place of registration, and in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required, which is deemed a secondary place of registration. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor. Existing law prohibits a legal document assistant from providing self-help service, as defined, for compensation unless he or she is registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required. Existing law requires a county clerk to, among other things, issue an identification card to each registered legal document assistant and unlawful detainer assistant. This bill would delete the requirement that a legal document assistant or an unlawful detainer assistant be registered in any other county in which he or she performs acts for which registration is required. The bill would also specify that a legal document assistant registered in the county in which his or her principal place of business is located and in which he or she maintains a branch office may provide self-help services in any part of this state. The bill would also delete references to primary and secondary places of registration. (2) Existing law requires an applicant for registration as a legal document assistant to meet specified educational requirements. Existing law requires the county clerk to, among other things, return an application and fee to an applicant, along with notice indicating the reason for the denial and the method of appeal, if the clerk finds that the applicant has not complied with the educational requirements for registration as a legal document assistant. This bill would additionally require an applicant for renewal of registration as a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to complete 15 hours of continuing legal education courses that meet specified requirements relating to attorneys during the 2-year period preceding renewal. The bill would require the applicant to state on his or her application for renewal, under penalty of perjury, that the applicant has completed the required continuing legal education courses. The bill would require the county clerk to return an application and fee to an applicant for renewal who fails to comply with this requirement. By revising the duties of county clerks with respect to the renewal of registration of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants, and by expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law provides for the renewal of registration of a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and requires the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a legal document assistant or an unlawful detainer assistant renewing his or her registration provided that there is no lapse in the period of registration. Existing law defines and regulates the activities of process servers and professional photocopiers, as those terms are defined, including requiring a process server or professional photocopier to be registered, as specified. Existing law provides for the renewal of registration under these provisions and requires the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a process server or professional photocopier renewing his or her registration provided that there is no lapse in the period of registration. This bill would instead require the county clerk to assign the same registration number to a registrant in any of the above-described professions, provided that the applicant is renewing registration in the same county in which he or she was previously registered and there is no lapse of three years or more in the period of registration. By changing the process by which county clerks renew registration of legal document assistants, unlawful detainer assistants, process servers, and professional photocopiers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law requires a registered legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include his or her name, business address, telephone number, registration number, expiration date of the registration, and county of registration in any solicitation or advertisement, and on any papers or documents prepared or used by the registrant. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor. This bill would delete the requirement that the expiration date of the registration appear on any papers or documents prepared or used by the registrant. The bill would also require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include his or her name, business address, telephone number, registration number, expiration date of the registration, and county of registration on a written contract for services required to be provided to a client, on any Internet Web site maintained by the registrant, and in any solicitation, advertisement, document, or correspondence prepared or used by the registrant in electronic form. By changing the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law prescribes the proper county of venue in civil actions. This bill, notwithstanding any other law, would provide that the proper venue in an action between a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and his or her client is the county in which the client has his or her primary residence. The bill would require a written contract entered into on or after January 1, 2016, between the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant and his or her client to include a statement to this effect and would make a contract voidable at the client's option for failure to comply with this requirement. (6) Existing law requires a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to make specified statements to a prospective client at the first in-person or telephonic solicitation indicating that he or she is not a lawyer. Existing law requires the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to make similar statements if the prospective client initiates the first contact and authorizes the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to have the prospective client read and sign a "Notice to Consumer" indicating that the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant has provided this information. This bill would recast these provisions and require a legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to provide this information at the first contact with the prospective client, regardless of which party initiates. The bill would also require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to provide the "Notice to Consumer," as specified, after making these oral statements and before entering into a contract or agreement for services or accepting compensation and to translate the "Notice to Consumer" into the language principally used in any oral sales presentation or negotiation. The bill would additionally require the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to inform the prospective client of the county in which he or she, or the partnership or corporation, is registered, the registration number assigned by the county, and the expiration date of his or her, or of the partnership's or corporation's, current registration period. The bill would also require the written contract between the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant to include the contact information of the county clerk's office for the county in which the legal document assistant or unlawful detainer assistant is registered, as specified. The bill would require the "Notice to Consumer" to include this information. (7) This bill would repeal the provisions regulating the activities of legal document assistants and unlawful detainer assistants as of January 1, 2021. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors AB 285?
AB 285 is sponsored by Gallagher, James (Republican).
What is the current status of AB 285?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2015. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 285?
Track AB 285 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 285

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 285

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →