California 2013-2014, 1st Special Session Status: Enacted

SB 2 — Health care coverage.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 2, Statutes of 2013-14 First Extraordinary Session.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing federal law, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) , enacts various health care coverage market reforms that take effect January 1, 2014. Among other things, PPACA requires each health insurance issuer that offers health insurance coverage in the individual or group market in a state to accept every employer and individual in the state that applies for that coverage and to renew that coverage at the option of the plan sponsor or the individual. PPACA prohibits a group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage from imposing any preexisting condition exclusion with respect to that plan or coverage. PPACA allows the premium rate charged by a health insurance issuer offering small group or individual coverage to vary only by rating area, age, tobacco use, and whether the coverage is for an individual or family and prohibits discrimination against individuals based on health status, as specified. PPACA requires an issuer to consider all enrollees in its individual market plans to be part of a single risk pool and to consider all enrollees in its small group market plans to be part of a single risk pool, as specified. PPACA also requires each state to, by January 1, 2014, establish an American Health Benefit Exchange that facilitates the purchase of qualified health plans by qualified individuals and qualified small employers, as specified. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires plans offering coverage in the individual market to offer coverage for a child subject to specified requirements. Existing law establishes the California Health Benefit Exchange (Exchange) to facilitate the purchase of qualified health plans through the Exchange by qualified individuals and qualified small employers by January 1, 2014. This bill would require a health care service plan, on and after October 1, 2013, to offer, market, and sell all of the plan's health benefit plans that are sold in the individual market for policy years on or after January 1, 2014, to all individuals and dependents in each service area in which the plan provides or arranges for the provision of health care services, as specified, but would require plans to limit enrollment in individual health benefit plans to specified open enrollment and special enrollment periods. The bill would prohibit these health care service plans from imposing any preexisting condition exclusion upon any individual and from conditioning the issuance or offering of individual health benefit plans on any health status-related factor, as specified. The bill would require a health care service plan to consider the claims experience of all enrollees of its nongrandfathered individual health benefit plans offered in the state to be part of a single risk pool, as specified, would require the plan to establish a specified index rate for that market, and would authorize the plan to vary premiums from the index rate based only on specified factors. The bill would authorize plans to use only age, geographic region, and family size for purposes of establishing rates for individual health benefit plans, as specified. The bill would require plans to provide specified information regarding the Exchange to applicants for and subscribers of individual health benefit plans offered outside the Exchange. The bill would prohibit a plan from advertising or marketing an individual grandfathered health plan for the purpose of enrolling a dependent of the subscriber in the plan and would also require plans to annually issue a specified notice to subscribers enrolled in a grandfathered plan. The bill would authorize the director to require a plan to discontinue offering individual plan contracts if the director determines the plan does not have sufficient financial viability or organizational capacity, as specified. The bill would make certain of these provisions inoperative if, and 12 months after, specified provisions of PPACA are repealed or amended, as specified. Existing law requires health care service plans to guarantee issue their small employer health benefit plans, as specified. With respect to nongrandfathered small employer health benefit plans for plan years on or after January 1, 2014, among other things, existing law provides certain exceptions from the guarantee issue requirement, allows the premium for small employer health benefit plans to vary only by age, geographic region, and family size, as specified, and requires plans to provide special enrollment periods and coverage effective dates consistent with the individual nongrandfathered market in the state. Existing law provides that these provisions shall be inoperative if specified provisions of PPACA are repealed. This bill would modify the small employer special enrollment periods and coverage effective dates for purposes of consistency with the individual market reforms described above. The bill would also modify the exceptions from the guarantee issue requirement and the manner in which a plan determines premium rates for a small employer health benefit plan, as specified. The bill would also require a plan to consider the claims experience of all enrollees of its nongrandfathered small employer health benefit plans offered in this state to be part of a single risk pool, as specified, would require the plan to establish a specified index rate for that market, and would authorize the plan to vary premiums from the index rate based only on specified factors. The bill would make certain of these provisions inoperative, as specified, if, and 12 months after, specified provisions of PPACA are repealed. Because a willful violation of these requirements with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) PPACA requires a state or the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement a risk adjustment program for the 2014 benefit year and every benefit year thereafter, under which a charge is assessed on low actuarial risk plans and a payment is made to high actuarial risk plans, as specified. If a state that elects to operate an American Health Benefit Exchange elects not to administer this risk adjustment program, the secretary will operate the program and issuers will be required to submit data for purposes of the program to the secretary. This bill would require that any data submitted by health care service plans to the secretary for purposes of the risk adjustment program also be submitted to the Department of Managed Health Care in the same format. The bill would require the department to use that data for specified purposes. (3) PPACA requires health insurance issuers to provide a summary of benefits and coverage explanation pursuant to specified standards to applicants and enrollees or policyholders. Existing law requires health care service plans to use disclosure forms that contain specified information regarding the contracts issued by the plan, including the benefits and coverage of the contract, and the exceptions, reductions, and limitations that apply to the contract. Existing law requires health care service plans that offer individual or small group coverage to also provide a uniform health plan benefits and coverage matrix containing the plan's major provisions, as specified. This bill would require that certain health care service plan contracts satisfy these requirements by providing a uniform summary of benefits and coverage required by federal law. (4) This bill would become operative only if AB 2 of the 2013–14 First Extraordinary Session is enacted and becomes effective. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 2, Statutes of 2013-14 First Extraordinary Session.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 60.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 51. Noes 25. Page 93.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (April 17).

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  11. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  12. Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  14. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  15. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  16. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 10. Page 18.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (February 21).

  19. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (February 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Set for hearing February 21 in APPR. pending receipt.

  21. Set for hearing February 20.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  23. Introduced. Read first time. Referred to Com. on RLS.

Sponsors

  • Monning · Cosponsor
  • Hernandez · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Hernandez

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Monning

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 27 Yea · 9 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 24902
Democratic 3000
Total 27902
% of votes cast 71%24%0%5%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Beall — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wright — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Block — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Roth — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wyland — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Yee — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Knight — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 51 Yea · 25 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 452003
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 512503
% of votes cast 65%32%0%4%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Yea
Stone — Yea
Daly — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Fox — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Bocanegra — Yea
Harkey — Nay
John A. Pérez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Holden — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Chau — Yea
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Not Voting
Nestande — Nay
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ting — Yea
Torres — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Williams — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Not Voting
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Democratic 1000
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Hall — Yea
Campos — Yea
Holden — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Linder — Nay
Pan — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12600
Democratic 1000
Total 13600
% of votes cast 68%32%0%0%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Nazarian — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Pan — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Gomez — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 26 Yea · 10 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231001
Democratic 3000
Total 261001
% of votes cast 70%27%0%3%
How each member voted (37)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Nay
Evans — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wright — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Yea
De León — Yea
Monning — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Cannella — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Walters — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Roth — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4200
Democratic 1000
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Hill — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 2 do?
(1) Existing federal law, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) , enacts various health care coverage market reforms that take effect January 1, 2014. Among other things, PPACA requires each health insurance issuer that offers health insurance coverage in the individual or group market in a state to accept every employer and individual in the state that applies for that coverage and to renew that coverage at the option of the plan sponsor or the individual. PPACA prohibits a group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage from imposing any preexisting condition exclusion with respect to that plan or coverage. PPACA allows the premium rate charged by a health insurance issuer offering small group or individual coverage to vary only by rating area, age, tobacco use, and whether the coverage is for an individual or family and prohibits discrimination against individuals based on health status, as specified. PPACA requires an issuer to consider all enrollees in its individual market plans to be part of a single risk pool and to consider all enrollees in its small group market plans to be part of a single risk pool, as specified. PPACA also requires each state to, by January 1, 2014, establish an American Health Benefit Exchange that facilitates the purchase of qualified health plans by qualified individuals and qualified small employers, as specified. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires plans offering coverage in the individual market to offer coverage for a child subject to specified requirements. Existing law establishes the California Health Benefit Exchange (Exchange) to facilitate the purchase of qualified health plans through the Exchange by qualified individuals and qualified small employers by January 1, 2014. This bill would require a health care service plan, on and after October 1, 2013, to offer, market, and sell all of the plan's health benefit plans that are sold in the individual market for policy years on or after January 1, 2014, to all individuals and dependents in each service area in which the plan provides or arranges for the provision of health care services, as specified, but would require plans to limit enrollment in individual health benefit plans to specified open enrollment and special enrollment periods. The bill would prohibit these health care service plans from imposing any preexisting condition exclusion upon any individual and from conditioning the issuance or offering of individual health benefit plans on any health status-related factor, as specified. The bill would require a health care service plan to consider the claims experience of all enrollees of its nongrandfathered individual health benefit plans offered in the state to be part of a single risk pool, as specified, would require the plan to establish a specified index rate for that market, and would authorize the plan to vary premiums from the index rate based only on specified factors. The bill would authorize plans to use only age, geographic region, and family size for purposes of establishing rates for individual health benefit plans, as specified. The bill would require plans to provide specified information regarding the Exchange to applicants for and subscribers of individual health benefit plans offered outside the Exchange. The bill would prohibit a plan from advertising or marketing an individual grandfathered health plan for the purpose of enrolling a dependent of the subscriber in the plan and would also require plans to annually issue a specified notice to subscribers enrolled in a grandfathered plan. The bill would authorize the director to require a plan to discontinue offering individual plan contracts if the director determines the plan does not have sufficient financial viability or organizational capacity, as specified. The bill would make certain of these provisions inoperative if, and 12 months after, specified provisions of PPACA are repealed or amended, as specified. Existing law requires health care service plans to guarantee issue their small employer health benefit plans, as specified. With respect to nongrandfathered small employer health benefit plans for plan years on or after January 1, 2014, among other things, existing law provides certain exceptions from the guarantee issue requirement, allows the premium for small employer health benefit plans to vary only by age, geographic region, and family size, as specified, and requires plans to provide special enrollment periods and coverage effective dates consistent with the individual nongrandfathered market in the state. Existing law provides that these provisions shall be inoperative if specified provisions of PPACA are repealed. This bill would modify the small employer special enrollment periods and coverage effective dates for purposes of consistency with the individual market reforms described above. The bill would also modify the exceptions from the guarantee issue requirement and the manner in which a plan determines premium rates for a small employer health benefit plan, as specified. The bill would also require a plan to consider the claims experience of all enrollees of its nongrandfathered small employer health benefit plans offered in this state to be part of a single risk pool, as specified, would require the plan to establish a specified index rate for that market, and would authorize the plan to vary premiums from the index rate based only on specified factors. The bill would make certain of these provisions inoperative, as specified, if, and 12 months after, specified provisions of PPACA are repealed. Because a willful violation of these requirements with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) PPACA requires a state or the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement a risk adjustment program for the 2014 benefit year and every benefit year thereafter, under which a charge is assessed on low actuarial risk plans and a payment is made to high actuarial risk plans, as specified. If a state that elects to operate an American Health Benefit Exchange elects not to administer this risk adjustment program, the secretary will operate the program and issuers will be required to submit data for purposes of the program to the secretary. This bill would require that any data submitted by health care service plans to the secretary for purposes of the risk adjustment program also be submitted to the Department of Managed Health Care in the same format. The bill would require the department to use that data for specified purposes. (3) PPACA requires health insurance issuers to provide a summary of benefits and coverage explanation pursuant to specified standards to applicants and enrollees or policyholders. Existing law requires health care service plans to use disclosure forms that contain specified information regarding the contracts issued by the plan, including the benefits and coverage of the contract, and the exceptions, reductions, and limitations that apply to the contract. Existing law requires health care service plans that offer individual or small group coverage to also provide a uniform health plan benefits and coverage matrix containing the plan's major provisions, as specified. This bill would require that certain health care service plan contracts satisfy these requirements by providing a uniform summary of benefits and coverage required by federal law. (4) This bill would become operative only if AB 2 of the 2013–14 First Extraordinary Session is enacted and becomes effective. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 2?
SB 2 is sponsored by Monning and Hernandez.
What is the current status of SB 2?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 2?
Track SB 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 2

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 2

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →