California 2013-2014, 1st Special Session Status: Enacted 2 D cosponsors

SB 1 — Medi-Cal: eligibility.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 4, Statutes of 2013-14 First Extraordinary Session.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2013. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 16 sponsors

    1 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2014, implement various provisions of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act) , as amended, by, among other things, modifying provisions relating to determining eligibility for certain groups. The bill would, in this regard, extend Medi-Cal eligibility to specified former foster children. The bill would also add, commencing January 1, 2014, mental health services and substance use disorder services included in the essential health benefits package, as adopted by the state and approved by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, to the schedule of Medi-Cal benefits, as specified. The bill would require the department to seek approval from the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide, effective January 1, 2014, specified individuals with an alternative benefit package, which would provide the same schedule of benefits provided to full-scope Medi-Cal beneficiaries qualifying under the modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) income standard, except as specified. The bill would provide that the implementation of the optional expansion of Medi-Cal benefits to adults who meet specified eligibility requirements shall be contingent on the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) payable to the state under the Affordable Care Act not being reduced to specified percentages, as specified. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would expand Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require that a person who wishes to apply for an insurance affordability program, as defined, be allowed to file an application on his or her own behalf or on behalf of his or her family and would authorize a person to be accompanied, assisted, and represented in the application and renewal process by an individual or organization of his or her choice. This bill would also require the department, to the extent required by federal law, to provide assistance to any applicant or beneficiary who requests help with the application or redetermination. The bill would require the department to file a state plan amendment to exercise a federal option to allow beneficiaries to use projected annual household income and to allow applicants and beneficiaries to use reasonably predictable annual income, as specified. This bill would require the department to seek any federal waivers necessary to use eligibility information of certain individuals who have been determined eligible for the CalFresh program to determine their eligibility for Medi-Cal and to automatically enroll parents who apply for Medi-Cal who have one or more children who are eligible based on determined income level at or below a specified standard. The bill would authorize the department to seek any federal waivers or state plan amendments necessary to use the eligibility information of individuals determined eligible for other state-only funded health care programs and county general assistance programs to determine an applicant's Medi-Cal eligibility to the extent that there is no General Fund impact. This bill would require the department to provide Medi-Cal benefits during the presumptive eligibility period to individuals who have been determined eligible on the basis of preliminary information by a qualified hospital, as specified. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations for use by the county in determining whether an applicant is a resident of the state and of the county, subject to the requirements of federal law. Existing law requires that the regulations require that state residency be established only if certain requirements are met, including the requirement that the applicant makes specified declarations under penalty of perjury. This bill would revise those provisions to, among other things, further prescribe the circumstances under which state residency may be established and to require the department to electronically verify an individual's state residency using certain sources and would set forth how an individual may establish state residency if the department is unable to electronically verify his or her state residency. The bill would, for purposes of establishing state residency, authorize an individual to make various declarations under penalty of perjury, and would authorize other individuals, such as parents or legal guardians, to make various declarations under penalty of perjury regarding the individual's state residency if the individual is incapable of indicating intent. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would provide that any individual who is 21 years of age or older, does not have minor children eligible for Medi-Cal benefits, would be eligible for Medi-Cal benefits but for a specified five-year eligibility limitation, and who is enrolled in and covered through the California Health Benefit Exchange with an advanced premium tax credit shall be eligible for specified Medi-Cal benefits and insurance premium costs and cost-sharing charges paid by the department, as specified. Under existing law, one of the ways by which Medi-Cal services are provided is pursuant to contracts with various types of managed care plans. This bill would require Medi-Cal managed care plans to provide mental health benefits covered by the state plan, as prescribed. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would become operative only if AB 1 of the First Extraordinary Session is enacted and takes effect.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 4, Statutes of 2013-14 First Extraordinary Session.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

  4. (Corrected June 19.)

  5. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 8. Page 76.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  6. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 55. Noes 24. Page 138.) Ordered to the Senate.

  8. (Corrected June 17.)

  9. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 131.)

  10. Ordered to third reading.

  11. Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 129.)

  12. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  14. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  15. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  16. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 7. Page 30.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 23.) (March 4).

  19. Set for hearing March 4.

  20. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 20.) (February 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Set for hearing February 27.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  23. Introduced. Read first time. Referred to Com. on RLS.

Sponsors

  • Steinberg · Cosponsor
  • Sharon Quirk-Silva · Cosponsor
  • Lara · Cosponsor
  • Hueso · Cosponsor
  • Hernandez · Primary
  • Gomez · Cosponsor
  • Eggman · Cosponsor
  • Correa · Cosponsor
  • Campos · Cosponsor
  • Blumenfield · Cosponsor
  • Alejo · Cosponsor
  • Garcia · Cosponsor
  • De León · Cosponsor
  • Calderon · Cosponsor
  • Sasha Renée Pérez · Cosponsor
  • Roger Hernández · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 106 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Hernandez

Co-sponsors (15)

Not signed on (106)

106 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 106 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 29 Yea · 8 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26802
Democratic 3000
Total 29802
% of votes cast 74%21%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Cannella — Yea
Evans — Yea
De León — Yea
Monning — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Torres — Yea
Wright — Yea
Lara — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Nay
Knight — Nay
Leno — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Roth — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 55 Yea · 24 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 491900
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 552400
% of votes cast 70%30%0%0%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Gray — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Campos — Yea
Holden — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Salas — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Levine — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Perea — Yea
Ting — Yea
Williams — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Stone — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Chávez — Nay
Linder — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Conway — Nay
Donnelly — Nay
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Daly — Yea
Fox — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Achadjian — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Pan — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Weber — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 54 Yea · 25 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 482000
Democratic 6100
Republican 0400
Total 542500
% of votes cast 68%32%0%0%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Eggman — Yea
Gray — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Fox — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Salas — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Medina — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Campos — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Stone — Yea
Bocanegra — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Conway — Nay
Bigelow — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Waldron — Nay
Wilk — Nay
Frazier — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gorell — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brown — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Nay
Logue — Nay
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Garcia, Robert Democratic Yea
Muratsuchi, Al Democratic Yea
Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12501
Democratic 1000
Total 13501
% of votes cast 68%26%0%5%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Lowenthal — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Pan — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Gomez — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Maienschein — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 24 Yea · 7 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 22705
Democratic 2001
Total 24706
% of votes cast 65%19%0%16%
How each member voted (37)
Member Party Vote
Wright — Yea
Anderson — Nay
De León — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Cannella — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Block — Yea
Knight — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Not Voting
Nielsen — Nay
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Yee — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 4 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4101
Democratic 0001
Total 4102
% of votes cast 57%14%0%29%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
De León — Yea
Lara — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 6 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6101
Total 6101
% of votes cast 75%13%0%13%
How each member voted (8)
Member Party Vote
Monning — Yea
Anderson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wolk — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1 do?
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2014, implement various provisions of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act) , as amended, by, among other things, modifying provisions relating to determining eligibility for certain groups. The bill would, in this regard, extend Medi-Cal eligibility to specified former foster children. The bill would also add, commencing January 1, 2014, mental health services and substance use disorder services included in the essential health benefits package, as adopted by the state and approved by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, to the schedule of Medi-Cal benefits, as specified. The bill would require the department to seek approval from the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide, effective January 1, 2014, specified individuals with an alternative benefit package, which would provide the same schedule of benefits provided to full-scope Medi-Cal beneficiaries qualifying under the modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) income standard, except as specified. The bill would provide that the implementation of the optional expansion of Medi-Cal benefits to adults who meet specified eligibility requirements shall be contingent on the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) payable to the state under the Affordable Care Act not being reduced to specified percentages, as specified. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would expand Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require that a person who wishes to apply for an insurance affordability program, as defined, be allowed to file an application on his or her own behalf or on behalf of his or her family and would authorize a person to be accompanied, assisted, and represented in the application and renewal process by an individual or organization of his or her choice. This bill would also require the department, to the extent required by federal law, to provide assistance to any applicant or beneficiary who requests help with the application or redetermination. The bill would require the department to file a state plan amendment to exercise a federal option to allow beneficiaries to use projected annual household income and to allow applicants and beneficiaries to use reasonably predictable annual income, as specified. This bill would require the department to seek any federal waivers necessary to use eligibility information of certain individuals who have been determined eligible for the CalFresh program to determine their eligibility for Medi-Cal and to automatically enroll parents who apply for Medi-Cal who have one or more children who are eligible based on determined income level at or below a specified standard. The bill would authorize the department to seek any federal waivers or state plan amendments necessary to use the eligibility information of individuals determined eligible for other state-only funded health care programs and county general assistance programs to determine an applicant's Medi-Cal eligibility to the extent that there is no General Fund impact. This bill would require the department to provide Medi-Cal benefits during the presumptive eligibility period to individuals who have been determined eligible on the basis of preliminary information by a qualified hospital, as specified. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations for use by the county in determining whether an applicant is a resident of the state and of the county, subject to the requirements of federal law. Existing law requires that the regulations require that state residency be established only if certain requirements are met, including the requirement that the applicant makes specified declarations under penalty of perjury. This bill would revise those provisions to, among other things, further prescribe the circumstances under which state residency may be established and to require the department to electronically verify an individual's state residency using certain sources and would set forth how an individual may establish state residency if the department is unable to electronically verify his or her state residency. The bill would, for purposes of establishing state residency, authorize an individual to make various declarations under penalty of perjury, and would authorize other individuals, such as parents or legal guardians, to make various declarations under penalty of perjury regarding the individual's state residency if the individual is incapable of indicating intent. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would provide that any individual who is 21 years of age or older, does not have minor children eligible for Medi-Cal benefits, would be eligible for Medi-Cal benefits but for a specified five-year eligibility limitation, and who is enrolled in and covered through the California Health Benefit Exchange with an advanced premium tax credit shall be eligible for specified Medi-Cal benefits and insurance premium costs and cost-sharing charges paid by the department, as specified. Under existing law, one of the ways by which Medi-Cal services are provided is pursuant to contracts with various types of managed care plans. This bill would require Medi-Cal managed care plans to provide mental health benefits covered by the state plan, as prescribed. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would become operative only if AB 1 of the First Extraordinary Session is enacted and takes effect.
Who sponsors SB 1?
SB 1 is sponsored by Steinberg, Quirk-Silva, Sharon (Democratic), Lara, Hueso, Hernandez, Gomez, Eggman, Correa, Campos, Blumenfield, Alejo, Garcia, De León, Calderon, Pérez, Sasha Renée (Democratic), and Roger Hernández.
What is the current status of SB 1?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2013. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1?
Track SB 1 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →