Medi-Cal: eligibility.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1.
You're tracking SB 1
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1 — Medi-Cal: eligibility.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 4, Statutes of 2013-14 First Extraordinary Session.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2013. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
16 sponsors
1 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2014, implement various provisions of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act) , as amended, by, among other things, modifying provisions relating to determining eligibility for certain groups. The bill would, in this regard, extend Medi-Cal eligibility to specified former foster children. The bill would also add, commencing January 1, 2014, mental health services and substance use disorder services included in the essential health benefits package, as adopted by the state and approved by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, to the schedule of Medi-Cal benefits, as specified. The bill would require the department to seek approval from the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide, effective January 1, 2014, specified individuals with an alternative benefit package, which would provide the same schedule of benefits provided to full-scope Medi-Cal beneficiaries qualifying under the modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) income standard, except as specified. The bill would provide that the implementation of the optional expansion of Medi-Cal benefits to adults who meet specified eligibility requirements shall be contingent on the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) payable to the state under the Affordable Care Act not being reduced to specified percentages, as specified. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would expand Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require that a person who wishes to apply for an insurance affordability program, as defined, be allowed to file an application on his or her own behalf or on behalf of his or her family and would authorize a person to be accompanied, assisted, and represented in the application and renewal process by an individual or organization of his or her choice. This bill would also require the department, to the extent required by federal law, to provide assistance to any applicant or beneficiary who requests help with the application or redetermination. The bill would require the department to file a state plan amendment to exercise a federal option to allow beneficiaries to use projected annual household income and to allow applicants and beneficiaries to use reasonably predictable annual income, as specified. This bill would require the department to seek any federal waivers necessary to use eligibility information of certain individuals who have been determined eligible for the CalFresh program to determine their eligibility for Medi-Cal and to automatically enroll parents who apply for Medi-Cal who have one or more children who are eligible based on determined income level at or below a specified standard. The bill would authorize the department to seek any federal waivers or state plan amendments necessary to use the eligibility information of individuals determined eligible for other state-only funded health care programs and county general assistance programs to determine an applicant's Medi-Cal eligibility to the extent that there is no General Fund impact. This bill would require the department to provide Medi-Cal benefits during the presumptive eligibility period to individuals who have been determined eligible on the basis of preliminary information by a qualified hospital, as specified. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations for use by the county in determining whether an applicant is a resident of the state and of the county, subject to the requirements of federal law. Existing law requires that the regulations require that state residency be established only if certain requirements are met, including the requirement that the applicant makes specified declarations under penalty of perjury. This bill would revise those provisions to, among other things, further prescribe the circumstances under which state residency may be established and to require the department to electronically verify an individual's state residency using certain sources and would set forth how an individual may establish state residency if the department is unable to electronically verify his or her state residency. The bill would, for purposes of establishing state residency, authorize an individual to make various declarations under penalty of perjury, and would authorize other individuals, such as parents or legal guardians, to make various declarations under penalty of perjury regarding the individual's state residency if the individual is incapable of indicating intent. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would provide that any individual who is 21 years of age or older, does not have minor children eligible for Medi-Cal benefits, would be eligible for Medi-Cal benefits but for a specified five-year eligibility limitation, and who is enrolled in and covered through the California Health Benefit Exchange with an advanced premium tax credit shall be eligible for specified Medi-Cal benefits and insurance premium costs and cost-sharing charges paid by the department, as specified. Under existing law, one of the ways by which Medi-Cal services are provided is pursuant to contracts with various types of managed care plans. This bill would require Medi-Cal managed care plans to provide mental health benefits covered by the state plan, as prescribed. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would become operative only if AB 1 of the First Extraordinary Session is enacted and takes effect.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 06/27/13 - Chaptered Current pdf June 27, 2013
- Enrolled 06/18/13 - Enrolled pdf June 18, 2013
- Amended 06/14/13 - Amended Assembly pdf June 14, 2013
- Amended 06/04/13 - Amended Assembly pdf June 04, 2013
- Introduced 01/28/13 - Introduced pdf January 28, 2013
- SB1 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 4, Statutes of 2013-14 First Extraordinary Session.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
-
(Corrected June 19.)
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 8. Page 76.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 55. Noes 24. Page 138.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
(Corrected June 17.)
-
Read third time and amended. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 131.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee. (Ayes 54. Noes 25. Page 129.)
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 7. Page 30.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 23.) (March 4).
-
Set for hearing March 4.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 20.) (February 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing February 27.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Introduced. Read first time. Referred to Com. on RLS.
Sponsors
- Steinberg · Cosponsor
- Sharon Quirk-Silva · Cosponsor
- Lara · Cosponsor
- Hueso · Cosponsor
- Hernandez · Primary
- Gomez · Cosponsor
- Eggman · Cosponsor
- Correa · Cosponsor
- Campos · Cosponsor
- Blumenfield · Cosponsor
- Alejo · Cosponsor
- Garcia · Cosponsor
- De León · Cosponsor
- Calderon · Cosponsor
- Sasha Renée Pérez · Cosponsor
- Roger Hernández · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 106 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hernandez
Co-sponsors (15)
- Steinberg
- Quirk-Silva, Sharon Democratic
- Lara
- Hueso
- Gomez
- Eggman
- Correa
- Campos
- Blumenfield
- Alejo
- Garcia
- De León
- Calderon
- Pérez, Sasha Renée Democratic
- Roger Hernández
Not signed on (106)
106 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 106 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 26 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 21% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 32% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (79)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Fox | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| John A. Pérez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Bocanegra | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dickinson | — | Yea |
| Donnelly | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gorell | — | Nay |
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Allen, Benjamin | Democratic | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Garcia, Robert | Democratic | Yea |
| Muratsuchi, Al | Democratic | Yea |
| Quirk-Silva, Sharon | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 26% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mansoor | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| V. Manuel Pérez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 19% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (37)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 14% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1 do?
- Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. This bill would, commencing January 1, 2014, implement various provisions of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Affordable Care Act) , as amended, by, among other things, modifying provisions relating to determining eligibility for certain groups. The bill would, in this regard, extend Medi-Cal eligibility to specified former foster children. The bill would also add, commencing January 1, 2014, mental health services and substance use disorder services included in the essential health benefits package, as adopted by the state and approved by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, to the schedule of Medi-Cal benefits, as specified. The bill would require the department to seek approval from the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide, effective January 1, 2014, specified individuals with an alternative benefit package, which would provide the same schedule of benefits provided to full-scope Medi-Cal beneficiaries qualifying under the modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) income standard, except as specified. The bill would provide that the implementation of the optional expansion of Medi-Cal benefits to adults who meet specified eligibility requirements shall be contingent on the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) payable to the state under the Affordable Care Act not being reduced to specified percentages, as specified. Because counties are required to make Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and this bill would expand Medi-Cal eligibility, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require that a person who wishes to apply for an insurance affordability program, as defined, be allowed to file an application on his or her own behalf or on behalf of his or her family and would authorize a person to be accompanied, assisted, and represented in the application and renewal process by an individual or organization of his or her choice. This bill would also require the department, to the extent required by federal law, to provide assistance to any applicant or beneficiary who requests help with the application or redetermination. The bill would require the department to file a state plan amendment to exercise a federal option to allow beneficiaries to use projected annual household income and to allow applicants and beneficiaries to use reasonably predictable annual income, as specified. This bill would require the department to seek any federal waivers necessary to use eligibility information of certain individuals who have been determined eligible for the CalFresh program to determine their eligibility for Medi-Cal and to automatically enroll parents who apply for Medi-Cal who have one or more children who are eligible based on determined income level at or below a specified standard. The bill would authorize the department to seek any federal waivers or state plan amendments necessary to use the eligibility information of individuals determined eligible for other state-only funded health care programs and county general assistance programs to determine an applicant's Medi-Cal eligibility to the extent that there is no General Fund impact. This bill would require the department to provide Medi-Cal benefits during the presumptive eligibility period to individuals who have been determined eligible on the basis of preliminary information by a qualified hospital, as specified. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations for use by the county in determining whether an applicant is a resident of the state and of the county, subject to the requirements of federal law. Existing law requires that the regulations require that state residency be established only if certain requirements are met, including the requirement that the applicant makes specified declarations under penalty of perjury. This bill would revise those provisions to, among other things, further prescribe the circumstances under which state residency may be established and to require the department to electronically verify an individual's state residency using certain sources and would set forth how an individual may establish state residency if the department is unable to electronically verify his or her state residency. The bill would, for purposes of establishing state residency, authorize an individual to make various declarations under penalty of perjury, and would authorize other individuals, such as parents or legal guardians, to make various declarations under penalty of perjury regarding the individual's state residency if the individual is incapable of indicating intent. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would provide that any individual who is 21 years of age or older, does not have minor children eligible for Medi-Cal benefits, would be eligible for Medi-Cal benefits but for a specified five-year eligibility limitation, and who is enrolled in and covered through the California Health Benefit Exchange with an advanced premium tax credit shall be eligible for specified Medi-Cal benefits and insurance premium costs and cost-sharing charges paid by the department, as specified. Under existing law, one of the ways by which Medi-Cal services are provided is pursuant to contracts with various types of managed care plans. This bill would require Medi-Cal managed care plans to provide mental health benefits covered by the state plan, as prescribed. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would become operative only if AB 1 of the First Extraordinary Session is enacted and takes effect.
- Who sponsors SB 1?
- SB 1 is sponsored by Steinberg, Quirk-Silva, Sharon (Democratic), Lara, Hueso, Hernandez, Gomez, Eggman, Correa, Campos, Blumenfield, Alejo, Garcia, De León, Calderon, Pérez, Sasha Renée (Democratic), and Roger Hernández.
- What is the current status of SB 1?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2013. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1?
- Track SB 1 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →