California 2011-2012, 1st Special Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 25 — Redevelopment.

Last action — Died on third reading file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2011-2012, 1st Special Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires a redevelopment agency, for the 2009–10 and 2010–11 fiscal years, to deposit revenue payments in its county's Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund for allocation to school entities. Existing law authorizes an agency, in order to make these payments, to borrow the amount required to be allocated to that agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund and requires the agency to repay the borrowed funds by a specified date. This bill would authorize an agency to extend the date of repayment for the borrowed funds by 5 years. Existing law suspends various activities of redevelopment agencies and prohibits the agencies from incurring indebtedness for a specified period. Existing law also dissolves redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of October 1, 2011, and designates successor agencies, as defined. Existing law exempts from dissolution a redevelopment agency of a community where the city or county that created the agency participates in a voluntary alternative redevelopment program, as prescribed. Existing law requires a participating city or county to make specified remittances for deposit in the Special District Allocation Fund and authorizes that city or county to enter into an agreement with an agency whereby the agency would transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city or county for the purpose of financing specified activities. This bill would make technical, clarifying, and conforming changes to these provisions. The bill would modify provisions relating to agency indebtedness and the transfer of housing funds and responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment agencies. The bill would also provide, for the 2012–13 and 2013–14 fiscal years only, that an agreement to transfer tax increment between a city or county and an agency may include an additional amount to reimburse the city for a specified shortfall. The bill would make certain provisions operative only if a specified provision of law is operative. The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Finance for the costs to comply with the bill. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on third reading file.

  2. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  3. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 6.) (September 8).

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  5. In committee: Set, second hearing. Further hearing to be set.

  6. In committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.

  7. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  8. Referred to Com. on B. & F.R.

  9. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  10. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 21. Page 180.)

  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  12. (Page 171.)

  13. Ordered to second reading.

  14. Without reference to committee.

  15. From printer.

  16. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Blumenfield · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Blumenfield

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 25 BLUMENFIELD Assembly Third Reading

Passed 49 Yea · 21 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4619010
Democratic 3000
Republican 0200
Total 4921010
% of votes cast 61%26%0%13%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Feuer — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Butler — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Davis — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hill — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Huber — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Ma — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Williams — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Logue — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Conway — Nay
Beall — Yea
Cook — Nay
Dickinson — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Torres — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Carter — Not Voting
Cedillo — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Miller — Not Voting
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Smyth — Not Voting
Valadao — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Nestande — Not Voting
Pan — Yea
Perea — Yea
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 25 do?
Existing law requires a redevelopment agency, for the 2009–10 and 2010–11 fiscal years, to deposit revenue payments in its county's Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund for allocation to school entities. Existing law authorizes an agency, in order to make these payments, to borrow the amount required to be allocated to that agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund and requires the agency to repay the borrowed funds by a specified date. This bill would authorize an agency to extend the date of repayment for the borrowed funds by 5 years. Existing law suspends various activities of redevelopment agencies and prohibits the agencies from incurring indebtedness for a specified period. Existing law also dissolves redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of October 1, 2011, and designates successor agencies, as defined. Existing law exempts from dissolution a redevelopment agency of a community where the city or county that created the agency participates in a voluntary alternative redevelopment program, as prescribed. Existing law requires a participating city or county to make specified remittances for deposit in the Special District Allocation Fund and authorizes that city or county to enter into an agreement with an agency whereby the agency would transfer a portion of its tax increment to the city or county for the purpose of financing specified activities. This bill would make technical, clarifying, and conforming changes to these provisions. The bill would modify provisions relating to agency indebtedness and the transfer of housing funds and responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment agencies. The bill would also provide, for the 2012–13 and 2013–14 fiscal years only, that an agreement to transfer tax increment between a city or county and an agency may include an additional amount to reimburse the city for a specified shortfall. The bill would make certain provisions operative only if a specified provision of law is operative. The bill would appropriate $1,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Finance for the costs to comply with the bill. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors AB 25?
AB 25 is sponsored by Blumenfield.
What is the current status of AB 25?
This bill died with 2011-2012, 1st Special Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 25?
Track AB 25 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 25

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 25

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →