California 2011-2012, 1st Special Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 13 — Energy: renewable resources: endangered species: environmental impact reports.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 10, Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2011. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 80% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) requires the Fish and Game Commission to establish a list of endangered species and a list of threatened species, and requires the Department of Fish and Game to recommend, and the commission to adopt, criteria for determining if a species is endangered or threatened. CESA authorizes the department to authorize the take of threatened species, endangered species, or candidate species by permit if certain requirements are met. CESA authorizes the department, in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and, to the extent practicable, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the United States Bureau of Land Management, to design and implement actions to protect, restore, or enhance the habitat of plants and wildlife that can be used to fully mitigate the impacts of the take of endangered, threatened, or candidate species (mitigation actions) resulting from certain solar thermal and photovoltaic powerplants in the planning area of the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. This bill additionally would authorize the department to design and implement these mitigation actions for proposed wind and geothermal powerplants in the planning area subject to the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. (2) Existing law requires the department to collect, and requires the owner or developer of an eligible project to pay, a one-time permit application fee of $75,000 to the department for deposit into the Fish and Game Preservation Fund. Existing law requires the department to utilize the permit application fee to pay for all or a portion of the department's cost of processing incidental take permit applications pursuant to CESA. This bill would additionally require the department, until January 1, 2016, to collect, and an owner or developer of an eligible project to pay, a permit application fee of either $25,000, $50,000, or $75,000, as specified, to the department for deposit into the Renewable Resources Permitting Account, to be established in the Fish and Game Preservation Fund, to pay for all or a portion of the department's cost of processing incidental take permit applications and specified administrative expenses. The bill would define "eligible project" to mean an eligible renewable energy resource, as defined in the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. If the permit application fee is determined by the department to be insufficient to complete permitting work due to the complexity of a project, the bill would require the department to collect an additional fee from the owner or developer to pay for its estimated costs, not to exceed an additional $200,000. The bill would require the department and the Energy Commission to enter into a cost-sharing agreement, as specified, governing all eligible projects, as defined, that are subject to the commission's certification requirements. The bill would appropriate $6,000,000 from the Fish and Game Preservation Fund, thereby making an appropriation. Existing law establishes the Renewable Energy Resources Development Fee Trust Fund as a continuously appropriated fund in the State Treasury to serve, and be managed, as an optional, voluntary method for developers or owners of eligible projects, as defined, to deposit fees sufficient to complete mitigation actions established by the department and thereby meet their requirements pursuant to CESA or the certification authority of the Energy Commission. The definition of eligible projects, for purposes of these provisions and fees, is limited to certain solar thermal powerplants and photovoltaic powerplants proposed to be constructed in the planning area subject to the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. This bill would expand the definition of eligible projects to include wind and geothermal powerplants proposed to be constructed in the planning area subject to the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. By expanding the purposes for which moneys in this continuously appropriated fund may be used, this bill would make an appropriation. (3) The Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act establishes the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , and requires it to certify sufficient sites and related facilities that are required to provide a supply of electricity sufficient to accommodate projected demand for power statewide. The act grants the Energy Commission the exclusive authority to certify any stationary or floating electrical generating facility using any source of thermal energy, with a generating capacity of 50 megawatts or more, and any facilities appurtenant thereto. Existing law requires the Energy Commission to establish a process for certain applicants for certification of a solar thermal powerplant that is proposed to be constructed in the planning area subject to the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan, as defined, that allows the applicant to elect to pay additional fees to be used by the Energy Commission to contract with 3rd parties to assist the Energy Commission staff in performing the analysis otherwise performed by staff in determining whether or not to issue a certification. This bill would expand this process to include any applicant for certification of an eligible renewable energy resource. The bill would require the Energy Commission to provide $7,000,000 in grants to qualified counties, as defined, for the development or revision of rules and policies, including, but not limited to, general plan elements, zoning ordinances, and a natural community conservation plan as a plan participant, to facilitate the development of eligible renewable energy resources, and their associated electric transmission facilities, and the processing of permits for eligible renewable energy resources. The bill would require a general plan element or zoning ordinance that is adopted or revised pursuant to a grant to be completed within 2 years of receipt of the grant and be consistent with the conservation strategies of any natural community conservation plan, if one has been approved or is under development. The bill would prohibit the commission from awarding a grant to a county that is not a "plan participant," as defined, in the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. The bill would require the Energy Commission, in its initial round of grant funding, to establish a preference for a grant to a qualified county in an amount that is adequate to develop a renewable energy element in its general plan that will facilitate the development and siting of eligible renewable energy resources that utilize multiple renewable energy technologies, and to also establish a preference for a grant for those counties that have experience in geothermal energy development and have adopted a geothermal element, as defined, to its general plan. (4) This bill would provide that Section 3 of this bill would be operative only if SB 16 of the 2011–12 Regular Session is enacted and becomes effective on or before January 1, 2012. This bill would require Section 3 of this bill to be operative on the effective date of this act or on the effective date of SB 16, whichever is later. (5) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 10, Statutes of 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:10 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 18. Page 251.).

  5. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 48. Noes 25. Page 250.)

  6. Assembly Rule 77 suspended.

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  8. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 11. Page 190.).

  9. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  10. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 6).

  13. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. In committee: Held under submission.

  15. In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  16. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (April 12).

  18. Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.

  19. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  20. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 15. Page 91.)

  21. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  22. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (March 2).

  23. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. Measure version as amended on March 1 corrected.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  26. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (February 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  28. From printer.

  29. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (117)

117 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 117 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 57 Yea · 18 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 531705
Republican 1100
Democratic 3000
Total 571805
% of votes cast 71%23%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Feuer — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Not Voting
Gorell — Not Voting
Halderman — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Butler — Yea
Eng — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Campos — Yea
Portantino — Yea
John A. Pérez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Knight — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Lara — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Yea
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Mitchell — Not Voting
Donnelly — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Mansoor — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Perea — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torres — Yea
Williams — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 29 Yea · 11 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 271000
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 291100
% of votes cast 73%28%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Yee — Yea
Evans — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
De León — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Negrete McLeod — Yea
Correa — Yea
Rubio — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Vargas — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cannella — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Walters — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Huff — Nay
Leno — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
La Malfa — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6300
Total 6300
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Nay
Runner — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Emmerson — Yea
Runner — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 58 Yea · 15 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 541406
Republican 1100
Democratic 3000
Total 581506
% of votes cast 73%19%0%8%
How each member voted (79)
Member Party Vote
Conway — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Dickinson — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Eng — Yea
Butler — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Huber — Yea
Cook — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Ma — Yea
Perea — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gorell — Not Voting
John A. Pérez — Not Voting
Campos — Yea
Halderman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Valadao — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Williams — Not Voting
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mansoor — Nay
Silva — Not Voting
Swanson — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bonnie Lowenthal — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
V. Manuel Pérez — Yea
Allen, Benjamin Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10501
Democratic 1000
Total 11501
% of votes cast 65%29%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Lara — Yea
Campos — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Davis — Yea
Donnelly — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Bradford — Yea
Hill — Yea
Norby — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 13 do?
(1) The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) requires the Fish and Game Commission to establish a list of endangered species and a list of threatened species, and requires the Department of Fish and Game to recommend, and the commission to adopt, criteria for determining if a species is endangered or threatened. CESA authorizes the department to authorize the take of threatened species, endangered species, or candidate species by permit if certain requirements are met. CESA authorizes the department, in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) and, to the extent practicable, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the United States Bureau of Land Management, to design and implement actions to protect, restore, or enhance the habitat of plants and wildlife that can be used to fully mitigate the impacts of the take of endangered, threatened, or candidate species (mitigation actions) resulting from certain solar thermal and photovoltaic powerplants in the planning area of the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. This bill additionally would authorize the department to design and implement these mitigation actions for proposed wind and geothermal powerplants in the planning area subject to the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. (2) Existing law requires the department to collect, and requires the owner or developer of an eligible project to pay, a one-time permit application fee of $75,000 to the department for deposit into the Fish and Game Preservation Fund. Existing law requires the department to utilize the permit application fee to pay for all or a portion of the department's cost of processing incidental take permit applications pursuant to CESA. This bill would additionally require the department, until January 1, 2016, to collect, and an owner or developer of an eligible project to pay, a permit application fee of either $25,000, $50,000, or $75,000, as specified, to the department for deposit into the Renewable Resources Permitting Account, to be established in the Fish and Game Preservation Fund, to pay for all or a portion of the department's cost of processing incidental take permit applications and specified administrative expenses. The bill would define "eligible project" to mean an eligible renewable energy resource, as defined in the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. If the permit application fee is determined by the department to be insufficient to complete permitting work due to the complexity of a project, the bill would require the department to collect an additional fee from the owner or developer to pay for its estimated costs, not to exceed an additional $200,000. The bill would require the department and the Energy Commission to enter into a cost-sharing agreement, as specified, governing all eligible projects, as defined, that are subject to the commission's certification requirements. The bill would appropriate $6,000,000 from the Fish and Game Preservation Fund, thereby making an appropriation. Existing law establishes the Renewable Energy Resources Development Fee Trust Fund as a continuously appropriated fund in the State Treasury to serve, and be managed, as an optional, voluntary method for developers or owners of eligible projects, as defined, to deposit fees sufficient to complete mitigation actions established by the department and thereby meet their requirements pursuant to CESA or the certification authority of the Energy Commission. The definition of eligible projects, for purposes of these provisions and fees, is limited to certain solar thermal powerplants and photovoltaic powerplants proposed to be constructed in the planning area subject to the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. This bill would expand the definition of eligible projects to include wind and geothermal powerplants proposed to be constructed in the planning area subject to the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. By expanding the purposes for which moneys in this continuously appropriated fund may be used, this bill would make an appropriation. (3) The Warren-Alquist State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act establishes the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , and requires it to certify sufficient sites and related facilities that are required to provide a supply of electricity sufficient to accommodate projected demand for power statewide. The act grants the Energy Commission the exclusive authority to certify any stationary or floating electrical generating facility using any source of thermal energy, with a generating capacity of 50 megawatts or more, and any facilities appurtenant thereto. Existing law requires the Energy Commission to establish a process for certain applicants for certification of a solar thermal powerplant that is proposed to be constructed in the planning area subject to the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan, as defined, that allows the applicant to elect to pay additional fees to be used by the Energy Commission to contract with 3rd parties to assist the Energy Commission staff in performing the analysis otherwise performed by staff in determining whether or not to issue a certification. This bill would expand this process to include any applicant for certification of an eligible renewable energy resource. The bill would require the Energy Commission to provide $7,000,000 in grants to qualified counties, as defined, for the development or revision of rules and policies, including, but not limited to, general plan elements, zoning ordinances, and a natural community conservation plan as a plan participant, to facilitate the development of eligible renewable energy resources, and their associated electric transmission facilities, and the processing of permits for eligible renewable energy resources. The bill would require a general plan element or zoning ordinance that is adopted or revised pursuant to a grant to be completed within 2 years of receipt of the grant and be consistent with the conservation strategies of any natural community conservation plan, if one has been approved or is under development. The bill would prohibit the commission from awarding a grant to a county that is not a "plan participant," as defined, in the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. The bill would require the Energy Commission, in its initial round of grant funding, to establish a preference for a grant to a qualified county in an amount that is adequate to develop a renewable energy element in its general plan that will facilitate the development and siting of eligible renewable energy resources that utilize multiple renewable energy technologies, and to also establish a preference for a grant for those counties that have experience in geothermal energy development and have adopted a geothermal element, as defined, to its general plan. (4) This bill would provide that Section 3 of this bill would be operative only if SB 16 of the 2011–12 Regular Session is enacted and becomes effective on or before January 1, 2012. This bill would require Section 3 of this bill to be operative on the effective date of this act or on the effective date of SB 16, whichever is later. (5) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. Governor Schwarzenegger issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 6, 2010. Governor Brown issued a proclamation on January 20, 2011, declaring and reaffirming that a fiscal emergency exists and stating that his proclamation supersedes the earlier proclamation for purposes of that constitutional provision. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared and reaffirmed by the Governor by proclamation issued on January 20, 2011, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Who sponsors AB 13?
AB 13 is sponsored by Skinner, Bradford, Rubio, Blanca E. (Democratic), and V. Manuel Pérez.
What is the current status of AB 13?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 07, 2011. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 13?
Track AB 13 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 13

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 13

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →