AN ACT CONCERNING VARIOUS CHANGES TO UTILIZATION REVIEW COMPANIES LICENSURE STATUTE.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 360 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 360.
You're tracking SB 360
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 360 — AN ACT CONCERNING VARIOUS CHANGES TO UTILIZATION REVIEW COMPANIES LICENSURE STATUTE.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 07, 2022. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
40 added · 104 removed40 line(s) added, 104 removed.
Senate GeneralBill Assembly File No.
188360 FebruaryPublic Session,Act 2022 Senate Bill No.
36022-84 Senate,AN MarchACT 29,CONCERNING 2022VARIOUS TheCHANGES CommitteeTO onUTILIZATION InsuranceREVIEW andCOMPANIES RealLICENSURE EstateSTATUTE. reported through SEN.
LESSER of the 9th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING VARIOUS CHANGES TO UTILIZATION REVIEW COMPANIES LICENSURE STATUTE.
(b) The [annual] license fee shall be [three thousand dollars] six thousand dollars and shall be dedicated to the regulation of utilization review, except that the commissioner shall be authorized to use such funds as is necessary to (1) implement the provisions of sections 38a- 91aa to 38a-91tt, inclusive, and (2) contract with The University of Connecticut School of Medicine to provide any medical consultations necessary to carry out the commissioner's responsibilities under this SB360title /with Filerespect No.to consumer and market conduct matters.
188(c) 1The SB360request Filefor licensure or renewal shall include the name, address, telephone number and normal business hours of the utilization review company, and the name and telephone number of a person for Senate Bill No.
188360 titlethe withcommissioner respect to consumercontact. and market conduct matters.
(c) The request for licensure or renewal shall include the name, address, telephone number and normal business hours of the utilization review company, and the name and telephone number of a person for the commissioner to contact.
ThisApproved actMay shall24, take2022 effectPublic asAct followsNo. and shall amend the following sections:
Section22-84 12 Januaryof 1,2 2023 38a-591j INS Joint Favorable SB360 / File No.
188 2 SB360 File No.
188 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 23 $ FY 24 $ Insurance Dept.
Utilization 177,000 (177,000) Review - Revenue Impact Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill changes the utilization review licensing fee paid by utilization review companies from an annual fee of $3,000 to a biannual fee of $6,000.
This change will result in a revenue gain of approximately $177,000 in FY 23 and a corresponding revenue loss of $177,000 in FY 24 to the Utilization Review Fund, a separate, non-lapsing account.
1 Overall, the amount of revenue collected over a two period will remain unchanged since the fee has been adjusted to reflect the change in the frequency of license renewals.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into thefuture, withtheamountsvarying basedonthenumber of utilization review companies licensed by the Insurance Department.
1According to the Insurance Department, there are 59 utilization review companies licensed in Connecticut as of March 24, 2022.
SB360 / File No.
188 3 SB360 File No.
188 OLR Bill Analysis SB 360 AN ACT CONCERNING VARIOUS CHANGES TO UTILIZATION REVIEW COMPANIES LICENSURE STATUTE.
SUMMARY By law, a utilization review company must obtain a license from the insurance commissioner to operate in the state.
This bill requires a utilization review company to renew its license every two years, rather than annually as under current law.
It correspondingly increases the license fee from $3,000 to $6,000.
Additionally, the bill requires a licensed utilization review company to file with the insurance commissioner any material change to approved policies, procedures, sample letters, or behavioral health clinical criteria.
It must do this within 30 days after the change.
Bylaw,autilizationreviewcompanyconductsareviewofhealthcare services, procedures, or settings to monitor or evaluate their medical necessity, appropriateness, efficacy, or efficiency.
Through utilization review, a company may make prospective, concurrent, or retrospective review benefit determinations on behalf of a health carrier (e.g., insurer or HMO) (CGS § 38a-591a (39) & (40)).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
January 1, 2023 COMMITTEE ACTION Insurance and Real Estate Committee Joint Favorable Yea 16 Nay 0 (03/17/2022) SB360 / File No.
188 4
View plain text versions (4)
- Chaptered Public Act No. 22-84 Current pdf
- File No. 188 View text pdf
- INS Joint Favorable View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text pdf
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 22-84
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 381
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
SENATE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 188
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 159
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/28/22
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0315
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Insurance and Real Estate
Sponsors
- Insurance And Real Estate Committee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Insurance And Real Estate Committee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (186)
186 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 186 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 360?
- SB 360 is sponsored by Insurance And Real Estate Committee.
- What is the current status of SB 360?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 07, 2022. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 360?
- Track SB 360 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 360
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 360
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →