Connecticut 2022 Regular Session Status: In Committee

HB 5376 — AN ACT CONCERNING RECOVERY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES UNDER THE STATE CODE OF ETHICS.

Last action — No Action

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

58 added · 7 removed

58 line(s) added, 7 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Substitute Bill No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
5376 February Session, 2022 AN ACT CONCERNING RECOVERY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES UNDER THE STATE CODE OF ETHICS.
494 February Session, 2022 Substitute House Bill No.
5376 House of Representatives, April 14, 2022 The Committee on Government Administration and Elections reported through REP.
FOX of the 148th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING RECOVERY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES UNDER THE STATE CODE OF ETHICS.
(c) [If a judge trial referee finds, after a hearing pursuant to this section, that there is no probable cause to believe that a public official or state employee has violated a provision of this part, section 1-101bb or section 1-101nn, or if the board determines that a public official or state employee has not violated any such provision, or if a court of competent jurisdiction overturns a finding by the board of a violation by such a respondent,] If (1) after a hearing pursuant to this section, the board determines that a matter was brought without any substantial justification, or (2) upon a subsequent appeal of the board's decision, a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a matter was brought without any substantial justification, the state shall pay the reasonable legal expenses of therespondent as determined by the Attorney General or by the court, if appropriate.
(c) [If a judge trial referee finds, after a hearing pursuant to this section, that there is no probable cause to believe that a public official or state employee has violated a provision of this part, section 1-101bb or section 1-101nn, or if the board determines that a public official or state employee has not violated any such provision, or if a court of competent jurisdiction overturns a finding by the board of a violation by such a respondent] If (1) after a hearing pursuant to this section, the board determines that a matter was brought without any substantial justification, or (2) upon a subsequent appeal of the board's decision, a court of competent jurisdiction determines that a matter was brought sHB5376 / File No.
If any complaint brought under the provisions of this part, section 1-101bb or section 1-101nn is made with theknowledgethatitismadewithoutfoundationinfact,therespondent shall have a cause of action against the complainant for double the amount of damage caused thereby and, if the respondent prevails in LCO \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2022HB-05376-R011 of 2 HB.docx Substitute Bill No.
494 1 sHB5376 File No.
5376 such action, the respondent may be awarded by the court the costs of such action together with reasonable attorneys' fees.
494 without any substantial justification, the state shall pay the reasonable legal expenses of therespondent as determined by the Attorney General or by the court, if appropriate.
If any complaint brought under the provisions of this part, section 1-101bb or section 1-101nn is made with theknowledgethatitismadewithoutfoundationinfact,therespondent shall have a cause of action against the complainant for double the amount of damage caused thereby and, if the respondent prevails in such action, the respondent may be awarded by the court the costs of such action together with reasonable attorneys' fees.
-LCO LCO R01-HB.docx }OUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2022HB-05376- 2 of 2
-LCO sHB5376 / File No.
494 2 sHB5376 File No.
494 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 23 $ FY 24 $ Comptroller - Adjudicated GF - Potential See Below See Below Claims Account Savings Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation This bill narrows the circumstances under which the state must pay reasonable attorneys' fees in proceedings brought against public officials or state employees under the code of ethics.
Current law does not limit the amount of attorneys' fees that the state is liable for;
thus, capping attorneys' fees may result in potential savings to the state.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation.
sHB5376 / File No.
494 3 sHB5376 File No.
494 OLR Bill Analysis HB 5376 AN ACT CONCERNING RECOVERY OF ATTORNEYS' FEES UNDER THE STATE CODE OF ETHICS.
SUMMARY This bill narrows the circumstances under which the state must pay reasonable attorneys’ fees in proceedings brought against public officials or state employees under the ethics code.
Under the bill, the state must pay these fees if the matter was brought without substantial justification, as determined by (1) the Citizen’s Ethics Advisory Board (CEAB) after a hearing or (2) a court handling an appeal of the board’s decision.
Under current law, the state must pay reasonable attorneys’ fees for respondents if (1) a judge trial referee finds, after a hearing, that there was no probable cause of an ethics code violation;
(2) CEAB determines that there was no code violation;
or (3) a court overturns the board’s finding of a violation.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2022 COMMITTEE ACTION Government Administration and Elections Committee Joint Favorable Yea 19 Nay 0 (03/29/2022) sHB5376 / File No.
494 4
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. No Action

  2. REF. BY HOUSE TO COMMITTEE ON Judiciary

  3. FILE NO. 494

  4. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 348

  5. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  6. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  7. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/13/22

  8. FILED WITH LCO

  9. Joint Favorable

  10. PUBLIC HEARING 0311

  11. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Government Administration and Elections

Sponsors

  • Government Administration And Elections Committee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Government Administration And Elections Committee

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (186)

186 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 186 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5376?
HB 5376 is sponsored by Government Administration And Elections Committee.
What is the current status of HB 5376?
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 5376?
Track HB 5376 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5376

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5376

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →