Connecticut 2022 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 R cosponsors

SB 264 — AN ACT CONCERNING A QUALIFIED DEDUCTION FROM MEDICAID APPLIED INCOME FOR CONSERVATOR COSTS.

Last action — REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ON Appropriations

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

237 added · 58 removed

237 line(s) added, 58 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
264 February Session, 2022 LCO No.
146 February Session, 2022 Substitute Senate Bill No.
2110 Referred to Committee on AGING Introduced by:
264 Senate, March 28, 2022 TheCommitteeonAgingreportedthroughSEN.MILLERofthe 27th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
(AGE) AN ACT CONCERNING A QUALIFIED DEDUCTION FROM MEDICAID APPLIED INCOME FOR CONSERVATOR COSTS.
AN ACT CONCERNING A QUALIFIED DEDUCTION FROM MEDICAID APPLIED INCOME FOR CONSERVATOR COSTS.
(1) Compensation of a conservator in the amount approved by the Probate Court or a minimum of one hundred twenty-five dollars a month, whichever amount is higher;
(1) Compensation of a conservator in the amount approved by the Probate Court or a minimum of ninety dollars a month, whichever amount is higher;
(2) Probate Court filing fees and expenses under subdivision (7) of subsection (b) of section 45a-106a and sections 45a-108a and 45a-109 of the general statutes;
(2) Probate Court filing fees and expenses under subdivision (7) of subsection (b) of section 45a- 106a and sections 45a-108a and 45a-109 of the general statutes;
LCO No.
sSB264 / File No.
2110 1 of 3 Raised Bill No.264 (b) The provisions of this section shall be applied to conservator expenses incurred on or after October 1, 2022, or the approval date of the Medicaid state plan amendment, whichever is later.
146 1 sSB264 File No.
(c) On or before December 31, 2023, and annually thereafter, the Commissioner of Social Services shall calculate the total amount deducted from the applied income of Medicaid applicants and recipientsundersubsection(a)ofthissectionduringtheprecedingfiscal year and inform the Probate Court Administrator, in writing, of the amount.
146 (b) The provisions of this section shall be applied to conservator expenses incurred on or after October 1, 2022, or the approval date of the Medicaid state plan amendment, whichever is later.
Not later than thirty days after receipt of the commissioner's calculation, the Probate Court Administrator shall transfer funds from the Probate Court Administration fund to the Department of Social Services equal to one-half of such amount for that year.
(c) On or before December 31, 2023, and annually thereafter, the Commissioner of Social Services shall calculate the total amount deducted from the applied income of Medicaid applicants and recipientsundersubsection(a)ofthissection duringtheprecedingfiscal year and inform the Probate Court Administrator, in writing, of the amount.
Not later than thirty days after receipt of the commissioner's calculation, the Probate Court Administrator shall transfer funds from the Probate Court Administration Fund to the Department of Social Services equal to one-half of such amount for that year.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) The baseline conservator compensation to be deducted from applied income pursuant to subsection (a) of section 1 of this act shall be one hundred twenty-five dollars per month, provided the Commissioner of Social Services shall approve fees above said amount if approved by the Probate Court at the time Medicaid is granted to a conserved person and upon redetermination of such conserved person's Medicaid eligibility.
Sec.
3.
The Commissioner of Social Services shall not treat any Probate Court-approved conservator or fiduciary fee paid by a Medicaid applicant or recipient for services rendered as an improper transfer of assets for the purpose of obtaining Medicaid eligibility.
The Commissioner of Social Services shall not treat any conservator compensation, fiduciary fee or expense approved by the Probate Court that is paid by a Medicaid applicant or recipient for services rendered by a conservator as an improper transfer of assets for the purpose of obtaining Medicaid eligibility, provided such applicant or recipient provides documentation of (1) fiduciary fee or expense payment, and (2) services rendered by such conservator in accordance with Probate Court regulations.
Sec.
3.
Subsection (a) of section 45a-594 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective from passage):
(a) Compensation payable to the conservator or guardian of any person who is supported wholly or in part by the state in any humane institution, or who is receiving benefits under any of the state's sSB264 / File No.
146 2 sSB264 File No.
146 programs of public assistance, shall be based upon services rendered and shall not exceed five per cent of the gross income to the estate during the period covered by any account.
The conservator or guardian shall be entitled to compensation of not less than [fifty] ninety dollars for any accounting period continuing for at least a year.
If extraordinary services are rendered by any conservator or guardian, the court of probate, upon petition and hearing, may authorize reasonable additional compensation.
A copy of the petition and notice of hearing shall be lodged in the office of the Commissioner of Administrative Services in Hartford atleast ten days before the hearing.
No commission or compensation shall be allowed on any moneys or other assets received from a prior guardian or conservator nor upon any amount received from liquidation of loans or other investments.
LCO No.
from passage Section 1 New section Sec.
2110 2 of 3 Raised Bill No.
2 from passage 17b-261(d) Sec.
264 Section 1 from passage New section Sec.
3 from passage 45a-594(a) Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
2 from passage New section Sec.
In Section 2(d), "Probate Court-approved conservator or fiduciary fee" was changed to "conservator compensation, fiduciary fee or expense approved by the Probate Court that is", "services rendered" was changed to "services rendered by a conservator" and "fiduciary fee payment" was changed to "fiduciary fee or expense payment" for consistency.
3 from passage 17b-261(d) Statement of Purpose:
AGE Joint Favorable Subst.
To authorize a qualified deduction from the income a Medicaid applicant or recipient must apply to the cost of care and not treat payment made by a Medicaid applicant or recipient to a conservator as an improper transfer of assets.
sSB264 / File No.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
146 3 sSB264 File No.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] LCO No.
146 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
2110 3 of 3
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 23 $ FY 24 $ Social Services, Dept.
GF - Cost 1,175,000 675,000 Social Services, Dept.
GF - Revenue Gain 375,000 Probate Court PCAF - Savings 900,000 1,125,000 Note:
GF=General Fund;
Show all 92 changed rows (52 more)
Previous
Latest
PCAF=Probate Court Administration Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill results in the impact described below due to requiring the state to deduct certain conservatorship expenses when calculating the amount of income an institutionalized Medicaid enrollee must contribute towards his or her care, to the extent allowed under federal law.
The bill results in increased state Medicaid costs of approximately $675,000 in FY 23 and $1,350,000 in FY 24 ($675,000 in FY 24 after a transfer from the Probate Court Administration Fund) by requiring the Department of Social Services (DSS) to deduct certain conservator expenses when calculating a Medicaid-eligible nursing home resident’s appliedincome.
ThisassumesastartdateofJanuary 1,2023.In addition, DSS willincur one-time Other Expensescostsofapproximately $500,000 in FY 23 to enhance the state's eligibility system in order to implement the applied income deductions specified in the bill.
The system enhancement costs are anticipated to result in a federal grants revenue gain of $375,000, which reflects federal reimbursement for such costs under Medicaid.
sSB264 / File No.
146 4 sSB264 File No.
146 These provisions also result in a net savings to the Probate Court Administration Fund (PCAF) of $900,000 in FY 23 and $1,125,000 in FY associated with requiring the Probate Court to transfer funds to DSS equal to one-half the amount deducted for conservator expenses in the prior fiscal year, beginning in FY 23.
In FY 21, the Probate Court supported conservator expenses for approximately 2,500 Medicaid individuals in long-term care.
The estimated impact to the PCAF and DSS is detailed in the tables below.
Probate Court PCAF $ FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Reduction in Conservator Reimbursement/Fee Waivers 900,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 Transfer to DSS (675,000) (1,350,000) Net Impact to PCAF 900,000 1,125,000 450,000 DSS Medicaid $ FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Gross Cost 1,350,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 State Share 675,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 Transfer from Probate - 675,000 1,350,000 Net Impact to DSS 675,000 675,000 - DSS Other Expense/Federal Grants $ FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Impact System Enhancements 500,000 - - Federal Grants Rev 375,000 - - Net Impact to State 125,000 - - The actual cost to DSS will depend on (1) the amount of the conservator expenses (including conservator compensation), Probate Court filing fees/expenses, and premiums for any Probate Court bonds counted as a deduction from a beneficiary’s income, and (2) the commensurate shift to the state for Medicaid costs which would have been paid by the beneficiary.
The bill will also result in a cost to the state Medicaid program to the sSB264 / File No.
146 5 sSB264 File No.
146 extent the penalty period that would have been imposed on an individual, making them temporarily ineligible for Medicaid long term care services, is either reduced or eliminated.
The cost to the state Medicaid program will depend on the reduction or elimination of the penalty period which would have been imposed on the individual and the scope of services that otherwise would not be eligible for Medicaid coverage.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact is detailed in the table above.
sSB264 / File No.
146 6 sSB264 File No.
146 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 264 AN ACT CONCERNING A QUALIFIED DEDUCTION FROM MEDICAID APPLIED INCOME FOR CONSERVATOR COSTS.
SUMMARY This bill requires the Department of Social Services (DSS) commissioner to amend the Medicaid state plan by December 31, 2022, to allow the deduction of certain conservator expenses when calculating a Medicaid eligible nursing home resident’s applied income.
In general, these residents must spend any income they have on their care, except for certain allowances (i.e., applied income).
In doing so, the bill requires the DSS commissioner, starting by December 31, 2023, to annually calculate the total conservatorship expenses deducted from a nursing home resident’s applied income in the preceding fiscal year and inform the probate court administrator in writing of the amount.
Within 30 days after receiving the commissioner’s calculation, the probate court administrator must transfer half of the conservatorship expenses for that year from the Probate Court Administration fund to DSS.
The bill also prohibits DSS from treating any probate court-approved conservator or fiduciary fees as an improper asset transfer for purposes of imposing a penalty period.
Lastly, the bill increases, from $50 to $90, the minimum monthly compensation for a conservator of a person receiving state assistance.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage APPLIED INCOME sSB264 / File No.
146 7 sSB264 File No.
146 Medicaid State Plan Amendment Under the bill, the DSScommissioner must amend the Medicaid state plan to allow the deduction from applied income of the following conservatorship expenses:
1.
compensation for the individual’s conservator, in an amount the probate court approves or $90 per month, whichever is greater;
2.
probate court filing fees and expenses, including conservatorship fees, fiduciary accounting fees, and miscellaneous fees (see BACKGROUND);
3.
premiums for any probate bond the court requires;
and 4.
any other fiduciary expenses approved by the probate court that are allowed under federal law.
The commissioner must seek approval from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the state plan amendment.
The bill applies to conservator expenses incurred on or after October 1, 2022, or the date CMS approves the state plan amendment, whichever is later.
PENALTY PERIOD Under federal law, DSS must impose a penalty period when individuals transfer assets for less than fair market value in the 60 months before applying for Medicaid coverage (i.e., improper asset transfer).
The bill prohibits DSS from treating any probate court- approved conservator or fiduciary fees as an improper asset transfer.To be exempt from the penalty (1) applicants must provide documentation of the fees and (2) the services must be provided according to existing court regulations.
By law, the penalty period (in months) is generally calculated by dividing the value of all assets transferred during the 60 months before application by the average monthly cost to a private patient of nursing facility services in the state or community.
Medicaid does not pay for sSB264 / File No.
146 8 sSB264 File No.
146 long-term services and supports during the penalty period.
BACKGROUND Probate Court Fees By law, the general fee for most probate court matters related to conservatorship is $225 (CGS § 45a-106a).
This includes filing motions to (1)appoint aconservator,(2)change residence or placement inalong- term care facility, and (3) terminate a conservatorship.
Under the law, the basic fee for a fiduciary to file an account in the probate court in any matterotherthanestatesettlementisatleast$50andupto$500peryear, based on a statutory formula (CGS § 45a-108a).
The lawalso allowstheprobate court to charge feesfor miscellaneous expenses (i.e., filing or copying certain documents) (CGS § 45a-109).
The law allows an indigent petitioner or applicant to the probate court to apply for a fee waiver (CGS § 45a-111).
COMMITTEE ACTION Aging Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 15 Nay 0 (03/10/2022) sSB264 / File No.
146 9
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ON Appropriations

  2. FILE NO. 146

  3. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 133

  4. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  5. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  6. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/28/22

  7. FILED WITH LCO

  8. Joint Favorable Substitute

  9. PUBLIC HEARING 0308

  10. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Aging

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (185)

185 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 185 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 264?
SB 264 is sponsored by Mitch Bolinsky (Republican) and Kevin C. Kelly.
What is the current status of SB 264?
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 264?
Track SB 264 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 264

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 264

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →