Connecticut 2022 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 4 D cosponsors

SB 306 — AN ACT CONCERNING DECEPTIVE INTERROGATION TACTICS.

Last action — HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 547

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

126 added · 55 removed

126 line(s) added, 55 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
306 February Session, 2022 LCO No.
518 February Session, 2022 Substitute Senate Bill No.
2165 Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
306 Senate, April 19, 2022 The Committee on Judiciary reportedthrough SEN.
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING DECEPTIVE INTERROGATION TACTICS.
WINFIELD of the 10th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING DECEPTIVE INTERROGATION TACTICS.
(NEW) (Effective October 1, 2022) As used in this section:
(NEW) (Effective October 1, 2022) (a) As used in this section:
(1) "Deception or coercive tactics" means the use of written, oral, electronic, nonverbal or any other form of communication that includes, but is not limited to, that which:
(1) "Deception or coercive tactics" means the use of conduct or written, oral, electronic, nonverbal or any other form of communication that includes, but is not limited to, that which:
(B) Represents false facts about evidence;
(B) Communicates false facts about evidence that were known or should have been known to be false;
(C) Provides facts pertaining to a crime or crimes that were not previously articulated by the person being interrogated;
(C) Provides holdback facts pertaining to a crime or crimes that were notpreviouslyarticulatedbythepersonbeinginterrogated inducingthe person to adopt these facts;
(D) Uses false or misleading promises of leniency or other false promises;
sSB306 / File No.
(E) Uses false statements or misrepresentations of the law;
518 1 sSB306 File No.
LCO No.
518 (D) Communicates false or misleading promises of leniency or other false promises;
2165 1 of 3 Raised Bill No.306 (F) Uses or threatens the use of physical force upon the person being interrogated or another person;
(E) Communicates false statements or misrepresentations of the law;
(F) Uses or threatens the use of physical force upon the person being interrogated or another person;
(H) Uses or threatens the criminalization of another person;
(H) Uses or threatens the unwarranted criminalization of another person;
(I) Uses or threatens the use of enhanced penalties, upon the person being interrogated or another person;
(I) Uses or threatens the unwarranted use of enhanced penalties, upon the person being interrogated or another person;
(2) "Law enforcement agency" means the Division of State Police within the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection or any municipal police department.
(2) "Holdback facts" means key incriminating facts about evidence presumed only to be known to law enforcement and the perpetrator or perpetrators of the crime, the knowledge of which are presumed to demonstrate guilt.
(b) Any admission, confession or statement, whether written or oral, made by any person, including a child under eighteen years of age, during a custodial interrogation by a law enforcement agency official or juvenile court officialor their agent,shallbepresumedto beinvoluntary and inadmissible in any proceeding if the law enforcement agency official or juvenile court official or their agent engaged in deception or coercive tactics during such interrogation.
(b) Any admission, confession or statement, whether written or oral, made by any person, including a child under eighteen years of age, during a custodial interrogation by a law enforcement agency official or their agent, shallbepresumedto beinvoluntary andinadmissibleinany proceeding ifthelawenforcement agency officialor their agent engaged in deception or coercive tactics during such interrogation.
(c) The presumption that any such admission, confession or statement is involuntary and inadmissible may be overcome if the state proves by clear and convincing evidence that the admission, confession or statement was (1) voluntary and not induced by the use of deception or coercive tactics, or (2) any alleged use of deception or coercive tactics did not undermine the reliability of the person's admission, confession or statement and did not create a substantial risk that the person might falsely incriminate themselves.
(c) The presumption that any such admission, confession or statement is involuntary and inadmissible may be overcome if the state proves by clear and convincing evidence that the admission, confession or statement was (1) voluntary and not induced by the use of deception or coercive tactics, and (2) any alleged use of deception or coercive sSB306 / File No.
LCO No.
518 2 sSB306 File No.
2165 2 of 3 Raised Bill No.
518 tactics did not undermine the reliability of the person's admission, confession or statement and did not create a substantial risk that the person might falsely incriminate themselves.
306 This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
October 1, 2022 Section 1 New section Statement of Purpose:
Section 1 October 1, 2022 New section JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
To make inadmissible statements or admissions obtained through the use of deceptive interrogation tactics.
sSB306 / File No.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
518 3 sSB306 File No.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except underlined.]e entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not LCO No.
518 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
2165 3 of 3
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill modifies criminal procedure relating to written or oral admissions and does not result in a fiscal impact.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None sSB306 / File No.
518 4 sSB306 File No.
518 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 306 AN ACT CONCERNING DECEPTIVE INTERROGATION TACTICS.
SUMMARY This bill creates a rebuttable presumption that a written or oral admission, confession, or statement is involuntary and inadmissible in any proceeding if it is made by anyone during a custodial interrogation by a law enforcement agency official or the official’s agent who used deceptive or coercive tactics.
Under the bill, the presumption may be overcome if the state proves by clear and convincing evidence that the (1) admission, confession, or statement was voluntary and not induced by deception or coercive tactics and (2) alleged use of deception or coercive tactics did not undermine the reliability of the person’s admission, confession, or statement and did not create a substantial risk that the person might falsely incriminate himself or herself.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2022 DECEPTION OR COERCIVE TACTICS Under the bill, “deception or coercive tactics” means the use of conduct or written, oral, electronic, nonverbal, or any other form of communication that includes the following:
Show all 62 changed rows (22 more)
Previous
Latest
1.
depriving the person being interrogated of physical or mental health needs, including food, sleep, use of the restroom, or prescribed medications;
2.
communicating false facts about evidence that were known or should have been known to be false;
3.
providing holdback facts about evidence relating to a crime or sSB306 / File No.
518 5 sSB306 File No.
518 crimes that were not previously articulated by the person being interrogated, inducing the person to adopt these facts (“holdback facts” are key incriminating facts about evidence presumed only to be known to law enforcement and the perpetrator of the crime, the knowledge of which is presumed to demonstrate guilt);
4.
communicating false promises, including false or misleading promises of leniency;
5.
communicating false statements or misrepresentations of the law;
6.
using or threatening to use physical force on the person being interrogated or another person;
7.
using means or undue pressure to impair the physical or mental condition of the person being interrogated to the extent of undermining the person’s ability to make an informed choice about whether to make a statement;
8.
using or threatening the unwarranted (a) criminalization of another person or (b) use of enhanced penalties upon the person being interrogated or another person;
or 9.
violating the constitutional rights of the person being interrogated.
COMMITTEE ACTION Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 21 Nay 18 (03/31/2022) sSB306 / File No.
518 6
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 547

  2. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  3. TRANSMITTED PURSUANT TO JOINT RULE 17

  4. SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A,B

  5. SEN. REJ. SEN. AMEND. SCH. C

  6. SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. B

  7. SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  8. FILE NO. 518

  9. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 381

  10. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  11. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  12. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/19/22

  13. FILED WITH LCO

  14. Joint Favorable Substitute

  15. PUBLIC HEARING 0309

  16. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

6 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 181 not signed on

Sponsors (6)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (181)

181 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 181 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 306?
SB 306 is sponsored by Winkler, Michael A., Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic), Martin M. Looney (Democratic), Michel, David, Josh Elliott (Democratic), and Anne M. Hughes (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 306?
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 306?
Track SB 306 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 306

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 306

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →