SB 412 — AN ACT PROHIBITING HOSPITALS FROM CHARGING FACILITY FEES FOR TELEHEALTH SERVICES.
Last action — FILE NO. 360
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
59 added · 11 removed59 line(s) added, 11 removed.
Senate General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
412360 February Session, 2022 LCOSenate Bill No.
3050412 ReferredtoCommitteeonINSURANCEANDREALSenate, ESTATEApril Introduced6, by:2022 The Committee on Insurance and Real Estate reported through SEN.
(INS)LESSER ANof ACTthe PROHIBITING9th HOSPITALSDist., FROMChairperson CHARGINGof FACILITYthe FEESCommittee FORon TELEHEALTHthe SERVICES.part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT PROHIBITING HOSPITALS FROM CHARGING FACILITY FEES FOR TELEHEALTH SERVICES.
Section 1 from passage 19a-906(h) INSSB412 Joint/ FavorableFile LCO 3050 \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00412-R011 of 2 SB.docx Raised Bill No.
412360 LCO1 3050SB412 {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SB-00412-File 2No. of 2 R01-SB.docx }
360 INS Joint Favorable SB412 / File No.
360 2 SB412 File No.
360 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 Office of the GF - Potential See Below See Below See Below State Savings Comptroller Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 Various Potential See Below See Below See Below Municipalities Savings Explanation The bill, which prohibits hospitals from charging facility fees for telehealth services, would result in savings to the state employee and retiree health plans as well as municipalities, beginning in FY 22, to the degree such fees are currently charged.
The UConn Health Center's revenues are not impacted because it does not charge facility fees for telehealth services to commercial health plans or to Medicaid.
The health center only does so to Medicare and MedicareAdvantageplans,aspermittedbyfederalregulations,andthis practice is unaffected by the bill.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation in facility fees.
SB412 / File No.
360 3 SB412 File No.
360 OLR Bill Analysis SB 412 AN ACT PROHIBITING HOSPITALS FROM CHARGING FACILITY FEES FOR TELEHEALTH SERVICES.
SUMMARY This bill prohibits hospitals from charging facility fees for telehealth services, whether those services are provided on or off the hospital campus.
By law, a “facility fee”isa feea hospital chargesor bills for outpatient services provided in a hospital-based facility to compensate the hospital for its operational expenses.
It is separate and distinct from a professional fee for medical services (CGS § 19a-508c).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage COMMITTEE ACTION Insurance and Real Estate Committee Joint Favorable Yea 17 Nay 0 (03/22/2022) SB412 / File No.
360 4
Action History
-
FILE NO. 360
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 258
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/05/22
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0318
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Insurance and Real Estate
Sponsors
- Michael A. Winkler · Primary
- Martin M. Looney · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Winkler, Michael A.
- Martin M. Looney Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (185)
185 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 185 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 412?
- SB 412 is sponsored by Winkler, Michael A. and Martin M. Looney (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 412?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 412?
- Track SB 412 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 412
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 412
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →