Connecticut 2022 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SR 11 — RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUPERSEDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ROBERT BARFIELD, ET AL. V. ANGEL QUIROS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER, CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION.

Last action — FILE NO. 626

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

46 added · 8 removed

46 line(s) added, 8 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Senate Resolution No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
11 February Session, 2022 LCO No.
626 February Session, 2022 Senate Resolution No.
4327 Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
11 Senate, April 25, 2022 The Senate Committee on Judiciary reported through SEN.
(JUD) RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUPERSEDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ROBERT BARFIELD, ET AL.
WINFIELD of the 10th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the resolution ought to be adopted.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUPERSEDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ROBERT BARFIELD, ET AL.
JUD Senate Favorable LCO \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SR-00011-R01 of 1 SB.docx
JUD Senate Favorable SR11 / File No.
626 1 SR11 File No.
626 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 23 $ FY 24 $ Comptroller - Adjudicated GF - Cost 112,500 None Claims Account Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The settlement requires the state to pay the fees and costs of the plaintiff's counsel resulting in a cost of $112,500 in FY 23.
The settlement also requires the Department of Correction (DOC) to provide hepatitis C (HCV) screening and treatment to all inmates until August 1, 2022 resulting in no fiscal impact because the DOC already provides these services.
1 The Out Years None.
1In FY 21 the DOC spent $7.7 million on HCV testing and treatment and are estimated to spend $9.0 million in FY 22.
SR11 / File No.
626 2 SR11 File No.
626 OLR Bill Analysis SR 11 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUPERSEDING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN ROBERT BARFIELD, ET AL.
V.
ANGEL QUIROS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER, CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION.
SUMMARY The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Resolutions.
COMMITTEE ACTION Judiciary Committee Senate Favorable Yea 7 Nay 2 (04/11/2022) SR11 / File No.
626 3
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. FILE NO. 626

  2. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 454

  3. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  4. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  5. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/25/22

  6. FILED WITH LCO

  7. Senate Favorable

  8. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

  9. FILED WITH SENATE CLERKS

Sponsors

  • Judiciary Committee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Judiciary Committee

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (186)

186 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 186 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SR 11?
SR 11 is sponsored by Judiciary Committee.
What is the current status of SR 11?
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SR 11?
Track SR 11 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SR 11

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SR 11

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →