Family Law
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 971 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 971.
You're tracking HB 971
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 971 — Family Law
Last action — Died in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 05, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Family Law; Requires that at least one judge be available in each judicial circuit on weekends, holidays, & after hours on weekdays to hear motions to enforce certain orders & agreements; requires chief judge to assign circuit judge to be available for certain hearings; requires that certain time-sharing matters be accorded priority on court's calendar; provides procedural requirements for evidentiary hearings on pleadings seeking temporary parental responsibility & time-sharing schedules & on motions to enforce compliance with existing time-sharing orders or agreements; requires court to issue upon motion by party, rather than authorizing court to make determination of, appropriate parenting plans.
Bill Text
- Introduced H 971 Filed Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill requires judges to be available for enforcement hearings outside normal business hours and prioritizes certain time-sharing matters in court schedules.
-
26.20
The chief judge shall may assign a judge for this purpose.Allows the chief judge to assign a judge for availability at their discretion instead of mandating it.
-
61.13
(10) The following time-sharing matters must be accorded priority on the court's calendar: (a) An evidentiary hearing on an initial pleading seeking temporary parental responsibility and time-sharing schedule not agreed to by the parties. Each parent must file a proposed temporary parenting plan with the clerk of the court as part of his or her initial pleading seeking temporary affirmative relief. Portions of the proposed temporary parenting plans which are in agreement with each other must be adopted as a voluntary agreed schedule between the parents before an evidentiary hearing. Absent good cause, the court shall set a hearing on the contested issues within 30 days after the pleading is filed. The court may not refer the parties to mediation as a condition precedent to the court holding a hearing unless the court has the consent of both parties. The court shall issue an order on temporary parental responsibility and time-sharing within 30 days after the evidentiary hearing. (b) An evidentiary hearing on a motion to enforce compliance with an existing time-sharing order or agreement. The court shall set a hearing on a motion seeking to enforce compliance with an existing time-sharing order or agreement within 5 business days after the motion is filed. If the judge assigned to the case is not able to conduct the hearing within 5 business days, a judge who is available pursuant to s. 26.20 must hold the hearing, which may occur during regular business hours, on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday, or after hours on a weekday.
Establishes a priority for time-sharing matters and sets specific timelines for hearings and decisions.
-
742.031
The court shall, upon motion by a party, issue may also make a determination of an appropriate parenting plan, including a time-sharing schedule, in accordance with chapter 61.→ The court shall, upon motion by a party, issue an appropriate parenting plan in certain proceedings.Changes the language to require a court to issue a parenting plan upon request rather than giving the court discretion.
-
742.031
If a paternity judgment contains only a child support award with no parenting plan or time-sharing schedule, the obligee parent shall receive all of the time-sharing and sole parental responsibility without prejudice to the obligor parent. If a paternity judgment contains no such provisions, the mother shall be presumed to have all of the time-sharing and sole parental responsibility.Removes provisions that automatically favor the obligee parent or the mother in terms of time-sharing and parental responsibility.
Action History
-
Died in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
-
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
-
Now in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
-
Referred to Judiciary Committee
-
Referred to Justice Budget Subcommittee
-
Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Dana Trabulsy · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Trabulsy, Dana Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 971 do?
- Family Law; Requires that at least one judge be available in each judicial circuit on weekends, holidays, & after hours on weekdays to hear motions to enforce certain orders & agreements; requires chief judge to assign circuit judge to be available for certain hearings; requires that certain time-sharing matters be accorded priority on court's calendar; provides procedural requirements for evidentiary hearings on pleadings seeking temporary parental responsibility & time-sharing schedules & on motions to enforce compliance with existing time-sharing orders or agreements; requires court to issue upon motion by party, rather than authorizing court to make determination of, appropriate parenting plans.
- Who sponsors HB 971?
- HB 971 is sponsored by Trabulsy, Dana (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 971?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced January 05, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 971?
- Track HB 971 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 971
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 971
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →