SR 4 — RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN SHEFF V. O'NEILL.
Last action — FILE NO. 4
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
101 added · 7 removed101 line(s) added, 7 removed.
Senate General Assembly SenateFile Resolution No.
4 February Session, 2022 ReferredSenate toResolution CommitteeNo. on EDUCATION Introduced by:
4 Senate, March 10, 2022 The Senate Committee on Education reported through SEN.
LOONEY,MCCRORY, 11D. Dist.
of the 2nd Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the resolution ought to be adopted.
ED Senate Favorable LCOSR4 \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2022SR-00004-R01/ ofFile 1No. SB.docx
4 1 SR4 File No.
4 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 23 $ FY 24 $ Education, Dept.
GF - Cost 26,222,070 29,802,613 Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 23 $ FY 24 $ Various Local and Regional Revenue Potential Potential School Districts Gain Various Local and Regional Cost Potential Potential School Districts Explanation The resolution results in additional annual costs to the state, ranging from $26.2 million to $31.5 million, from FY 23 through at least FY 32, associated with the settlement agreement dated January 27, 2022, in the action Sheff v.
O'Neill.
FY 23:
The anticipated breakout of FY 23 costs is shown in the table below:
Account FY 23 ($) Magnet Schools 4,442,409 Sheff Transportation 1,427,476 Sheff Settlement 12,334,185 Open Choice 8,018,000 Total 26,222,070 This additional funding of $26,222,070 is included in the Governor's SR4 / File No.
4 2 SR4 File No.
4 proposed budget for these purposes.
Funding includes $4,442,409 for the Magnet Schools account and corresponding Sheff Transportation funding of $1,427,476, which is anticipated to fund approximately 290 new magnet school seats for Hartford residents.
Additionally, $8,018,000 in new funding is provided for the Open Choice account.
The new Open Choice funding will increase the per- pupil Open Choice grant rate by $2,000 for districts in the Sheff region, resulting in new base grant rates of $5,000 to $10,000 per student.
The funding also includes 150 additional Open Choice seats, if offered by receiving districts.
Additional items funded within the Open Choice account are:
(1) $400,000 for educational advocates for students participating in the program in the Sheff region;
(2) $150,000 for academic and social support;
(3) a $750,000 bonus to be divided among districts increasing program enrollment by 20% over the prior school year;
and (4) a $750,000 bonus to be divided among districts increasing enrollment of Hartford-resident students at the entry grades of the receiving district over the prior year by at least five additional students in the same grade at an individual school.
Funding of $12,334,185 is included for the Sheff Settlement account.
The additional funding will provide increased support for various initiatives across participating Sheff schools, including:
reformulation, extracurricular programs, athletics, progress bonuses, minority teacher recruitment, marketing, and equity programming.
Local and regional school districts in the Sheff region may incur a potentialrevenuegainassociatedwithincreasedOpenChoiceper-pupil grants, Open Choice bonuses, or expanded programmatic outreach through the Sheff Settlement account.
Districts may simultaneously experience higher magnet school tuitioncostsdue tothesettlement'sincreaseinseatsat certainCRECand Goodwin University schools.
FY 24:
Additional costs of $29,802,613 are anticipated for FY 24, associated with the following accounts:
SR4 / File No.
4 3 SR4 File No.
4 Account FY 24 ($) Magnet Schools 6,302,816 Sheff Transportation 2,097,613 Sheff Settlement 12,884,185 Open Choice 8,518,000 Total 29,802,613 The impacts to districts associated with the Open Choice program changes and the magnet school expansion will continue in FY 24.
Show all 48 changed lines (8 more)
The Out Years These fiscal impacts will continue in the outyears, through at least FY 32, with annual costs ranging from approximately $29 million to $31.5 million.
SR4 / File No.
4 4 SR4 File No.
4 OLR Bill Analysis SR 4 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN SHEFF V.
O'NEILL.
SUMMARY The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Resolutions.
COMMITTEE ACTION Education Committee Senate Favorable Yea 7 Nay 0 (03/07/2022) SR4 / File No.
4 5
Show all 48 changed rows (8 more)
Action History
-
FILE NO. 4
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 27
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/14/22
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Senate Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0304
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Education
-
FILED WITH SENATE CLERKS
Sponsors
- Martin M. Looney · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Martin M. Looney Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (186)
186 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 186 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SR 4?
- SR 4 is sponsored by Martin M. Looney (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SR 4?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SR 4?
- Track SR 4 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SR 4
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SR 4
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →