SB 26 — Signal jamming.
Last action — Public Law 183
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Mike Braun (Republican) on May 06, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
10 sponsors
4 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (8 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Provides that a signal jammer may be seized. Provides that a person who knowingly or intentionally manufactures, offers for sale, imports, markets, sells, possesses, uses, or operates a signal jammer commits unlawful use of a signal jammer, a Level 6 felony. Provides that the offense is a Level 5 felony if a signal jammer is used to disrupt a component of a critical infrastructure facility or the communications of a public safety agency. Provides, for purposes of criminal statutes regarding offenses involving critical infrastructure, that a communications services facility includes wires and equipment used to provide communications service to a customer.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 26 on the official Indiana source →Action History
-
Public Law 183
-
Signed by the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker
-
Signed by the President Pro Tempore
-
Conference Committee Report 1: adopted by the Senate; Roll Call 481: yeas 48, nays 1
-
CCR # 1 filed in the House
-
Rules Suspended. Conference Committee Report 1: adopted by the House; Roll Call 505: yeas 83, nays 8
-
CCR # 1 filed in the Senate
-
House conferees appointed: Ledbetter and Pierce M
-
House advisors appointed: Sweet, Lindauer and McNamara
-
Senate dissented from House amendments
-
Senate conferees appointed: Tomes and Taylor G
-
Senate advisors appointed: Pol, Freeman and Byrne
-
Returned to the Senate with amendments
-
Motion to dissent filed
-
Motion to dissent filed
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 389: yeas 88, nays 6
-
Second reading: ordered engrossed
-
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
-
Representative Pierce M added as cosponsor
-
Representatives Sweet and Lindauer added as cosponsors
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Courts and Criminal Code
-
Referred to the House
-
House sponsor: Representative Ledbetter
-
Senator Randolph added as coauthor
-
Senator Buck added as coauthor
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 14: yeas 49, nays 0
-
Amendment #1 (Young M) prevailed; voice vote
-
Senator Doriot added as coauthor
-
Amendment #2 (Freeman) prevailed; voice vote
-
Second reading: amended, ordered engrossed
-
Committee report: do pass, adopted
-
Senator Freeman added as second author
-
Senator Byrne added as third author
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Corrections and Criminal Law
-
Authored by Senator Tomes
Sponsors
- Matt Pierce · Cosponsor
- Shane Lindauer · Cosponsor
- Lorissa Sweet · Cosponsor
- Cindy Ledbetter · Primary
- Lonnie Randolph · Cosponsor
- James Buck · Cosponsor
- Blake Doriot · Cosponsor
- Gary Byrne · Primary
- Aaron Freeman · Primary
- James Tomes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 140 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Cindy Ledbetter Republican
- Gary Byrne Republican
- Aaron Freeman Republican
- James Tomes Republican
Co-sponsors (6)
- Matt Pierce Democrat
- Shane Lindauer Republican
- Lorissa Sweet Republican
- Lonnie Randolph Democrat
- James Buck Republican
- Blake Doriot Republican
Not signed on (140)
140 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 140 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 26 do?
- Provides that a signal jammer may be seized. Provides that a person who knowingly or intentionally manufactures, offers for sale, imports, markets, sells, possesses, uses, or operates a signal jammer commits unlawful use of a signal jammer, a Level 6 felony. Provides that the offense is a Level 5 felony if a signal jammer is used to disrupt a component of a critical infrastructure facility or the communications of a public safety agency. Provides, for purposes of criminal statutes regarding offenses involving critical infrastructure, that a communications services facility includes wires and equipment used to provide communications service to a customer.
- Who sponsors SB 26?
- SB 26 is sponsored by Matt Pierce (Democrat), Shane Lindauer (Republican), Lorissa Sweet (Republican), Cindy Ledbetter (Republican), Lonnie Randolph (Democrat), James Buck (Republican), Blake Doriot (Republican), Gary Byrne (Republican), Aaron Freeman (Republican), and James Tomes (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 26?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 26?
- Track SB 26 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 26
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 26
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →