SB 72 — Therapist immunity from professional discipline.
Last action — Senator Tomes added as second author
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Provides that the behavioral health and human services licensing board may not impose disciplinary sanctions against a practitioner if the basis of the licensing complaint is retaliatory against the practitioner for testifying in a child custody proceeding, a child in need of services proceeding, or a termination of parent-child relationship proceeding.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 72 on the official Indiana source →Action History
-
Senator Tomes added as second author
-
Senator Bohacek added as coauthor
-
Senator Niemeyer added as third author
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Health and Provider Services
-
Authored by Senator Dernulc
Sponsors
- Mike Bohacek · Cosponsor
- Rick Niemeyer · Primary
- James Tomes · Primary
- Dan Dernulc · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Rick Niemeyer Republican
- James Tomes Republican
- Dan Dernulc Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Mike Bohacek Republican
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 72 do?
- Provides that the behavioral health and human services licensing board may not impose disciplinary sanctions against a practitioner if the basis of the licensing complaint is retaliatory against the practitioner for testifying in a child custody proceeding, a child in need of services proceeding, or a termination of parent-child relationship proceeding.
- Who sponsors SB 72?
- SB 72 is sponsored by Mike Bohacek (Republican), Rick Niemeyer (Republican), James Tomes (Republican), and Dan Dernulc (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 72?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 72?
- Track SB 72 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 72
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 72
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →