SB 686 — Agricultural Enclaves
Last action — Chapter No. 2026-34
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced December 01, 2025. It awaits signature.
Signed by Governor Ron DeSantis (Republican) on April 09, 2026.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Agricultural Enclaves; Authorizing certain persons to apply to the governing body of the local government for certification of certain parcels as agricultural enclaves; requiring the local government to hold a public hearing within a specified timeframe to approve or deny such certification; authorizing certain persons to submit certain development plans; authorizing the development of certain parcels for commercial, industrial, or single-family residential purposes under certain circumstances, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
210 added · 225 removed210 line(s) added, 225 removed.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 686 By the CommitteesCommittee on Judiciary;Community Affairs;
and CommunitySenator Affairs;McClain 578-02034-26 2026686c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to agricultural enclaves;
and Senator McClain 590-02692-26 2026686c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to agricultural enclaves;
authorizingdeleting theprovisions developmentrelating ofto certain certifiedamendments agriculturalto enclavesa forlocal commercial,government’s industrial,comprehensive orplan; single-family residential purposes under certain circumstances;
deleting provisions relating to certain amendments to Page 1 of 8 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 686 590-02692-26 2026686c2 a local government’s comprehensive plan;
providingPage for1 the future expiration and reversion of specified8 provisions;CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 686 578-02034-26 2026686c1 providing for the future expiration and reversion of specified provisions;
If the local government does not approve or deny certification of the parcel as an agricultural enclave within 90 days after receipt of the Pageapplication, 2the ofparcel 8must CODING:be certified as an agricultural enclave.
(d) If the application is denied, the governing body of the Page 2 of 8 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 686 590-02692-26578-02034-26 2026686c22026686c1 application,local thegovernment parcel must beissue certifiedits asdecision anin agriculturalwriting enclave.with detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(d) If the application is denied, the governing body of the local government must issue its decision in writing with detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(g) Within 30 business days after the local government’s receipt of development plans under paragraph (e), the local government and the owner of the parcel certified as an agricultural enclave must agree in writing to a process and schedule for information submittal, analysis, and final approval, which may be administrative in nature, of the Pagedevelopment 3plans. of 8 CODING:
The local government may not require the owner to agree to a process that is longer than 180 days in duration or that includes further review of the plans in a Page 3 of 8 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 686 590-02692-26578-02034-26 2026686c22026686c1 developmentquasi-judicial plans.process or public hearing AMENDMENT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.—The owner of a parcel of land defined as an agricultural enclave under s.
The local government may not require the owner to agree to a process that is longer than 180 days in duration or that includes further review of the plans in a quasi-judicial process or public hearing.
(h) Notwithstanding paragraph (e), a certified agricultural enclave as defined in s.
163.3164(4)(c)1.c.
which is adjacent to an interstate highway may be developed for commercial, industrial, or single-family residential purposes if one or more adjacent parcels or an adjacent development permits the same density or intensity as the proposed development AMENDMENT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.—The owner of a parcel of land defined as an agricultural enclave under s.
(a) The local government and the owner of a parcel of land that is the subject of an application for an amendment shall have 180 days following the date that the local government receives a complete application to negotiate in good faith to Pagereach 4consensus on the land uses and intensities of 8use CODING:that are consistent with the uses and intensities of use of the industrial, commercial, or residential areas that surround the parcel.
Within 30 days after the local government’s receipt of such an application, the local government and owner must agree in writing to a schedule for information submittal, public hearings, negotiations, and final action on the amendment, which schedule may thereafter be altered only with the written consent of the local government and the owner.
Compliance with the Page 4 of 8 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 686 590-02692-26578-02034-26 2026686c22026686c1 reachschedule consensusin on the landwritten usesagreement andconstitutes intensitiesgood offaith usenegotiations thatfor arepurposes consistent with the uses and intensities of useparagraph of(c). the industrial, commercial, or residential areas that surround the parcel.
Within 30 days after the local government’s receipt of such an application, the local government and owner must agree in writing to a schedule for information submittal, public hearings, negotiations, and final action on the amendment, which schedule may thereafter be altered only with the written consent of the local government and the owner.
Compliance with the schedule in the written agreement constitutes good faith negotiations for purposes of paragraph (c).
Page(h)(d) 5Nothing within this subsection relating to agricultural enclaves shall preempt or replace any protection currently existing for any property located within the boundaries of 8any CODING:of the following areas:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 686 590-02692-26 2026686c2 (i)(d) Nothing within this subsection relating to agricultural enclaves shall preempt or replace any protection currently existing for any property located within the boundaries of any of the following areas:
Any area of critical state concern, as designated in s.
s.
380.055, s.
380.0551, s.
380.0552, s.
380.0553, or s.
380.0555.
Show all 64 changed lines (24 more)
4.
The Florida wildlife corridor, as defined in s.
259.1055(4).
5.
SectionPage 2.5 of 8 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 686 578-02034-26 2026686c1 Section 2.
A parcel or parcels Property that have has existing Pageindustrial, 6commercial, ofor 8residential CODING:development;
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 686 590-02692-26 2026686c2 industrial, commercial, or residential development;
Do not exceed 700 acres and are surrounded on at least 50 percent of their perimeter by a parcel or parcels that the localPage government6 hasof designated8 onCODING: the local government’s future land use map as land that is to be developed for industrial, commercial, or residential purposes;
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 686 578-02034-26 2026686c1 local government has designated on the local government’s future land use map as land that is to be developed for industrial, commercial, or residential purposes;
(d) Have Has public services, including water, wastewater, transportation, schools, and recreation facilities, available or such public services are scheduled in the capital improvement element to be provided by the local government or can be provided by an alternative provider of local government infrastructure in order to ensure consistency with applicable Pageconcurrency 7provisions of 8s. CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 686 590-02692-26 2026686c2 concurrency provisions of s.
WherePage a7 right-of-way, body of water,8 orCODING: canal exists along the perimeter of a parcel, the perimeter calculations of the agricultural enclave must be based on the adjacent parcel or parcels across the right-of-way, body of water, or canal.
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 686 578-02034-26 2026686c1 Where a right-of-way, body of water, or canal exists along the perimeter of a parcel, the perimeter calculations of the agricultural enclave must be based on the adjacent parcel or parcels across the right-of-way, body of water, or canal.
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- S 686 c1 View text pdf
- S 686 c2 View text pdf
- S 686 c3 View text pdf
- S 686 er View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 686 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Chapter No. 2026-34
-
Approved by Governor
-
Signed by Officers and presented to Governor
-
Ordered enrolled
-
CS passed; YEAS 90, NAYS 20
-
Read 3rd time
-
Added to Third Reading Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 3)
-
Bill added to Special Order Calendar (3/11/2026)
-
Bill referred to House Calendar
-
In Messages
-
Immediately certified -SJ 463
-
CS passed; YEAS 34 NAYS 2 -SJ 455
-
Read 3rd time -SJ 455
-
Read 2nd time -SJ 455
-
CS/CS/CS by Rules read 1st time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 02/26/26
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS/CS by- Rules; YEAS 23 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/24/26, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Rules
-
CS/CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Judiciary; YEAS 11 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 02/10/26, 12:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
CS by Community Affairs read 1st time
-
Now in Judiciary
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Community Affairs; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Community Affairs, 01/20/26, 1:00 pm, 37 Senate Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Community Affairs; Judiciary; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Stan McClain · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 22 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- McClain, Stan Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 5% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Smith | — | Nay |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Bernard, Mack | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Nay |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharief, Barbara | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Not Voting |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 81 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 8 | 19 | 0 | 6 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 20 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 17% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (117)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 26 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| No Party Affiliation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 5% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Bernard, Mack | Democrat | Yea |
| Bracy Davis, LaVon | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Nay |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharief, Barbara | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Not Voting |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Smith, David | Republican | Nay |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Not Voting |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharief, Barbara | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 686 do?
- Agricultural Enclaves; Authorizing certain persons to apply to the governing body of the local government for certification of certain parcels as agricultural enclaves; requiring the local government to hold a public hearing within a specified timeframe to approve or deny such certification; authorizing certain persons to submit certain development plans; authorizing the development of certain parcels for commercial, industrial, or single-family residential purposes under certain circumstances, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 686?
- SB 686 is sponsored by McClain, Stan (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 686?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced December 01, 2025. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track SB 686?
- Track SB 686 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 686
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 686
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →