SB 216 — Agriculture and pesticides.
Last action — Public Law 29
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
4 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Requires the dean of agriculture of Purdue University to submit certain annual reports to the legislative council and the budget committee as well as to the governor. Makes several changes in the laws concerning pesticides and pesticide use and application. Adds and revises definitions of terms used in those laws. Provides for the adoption of certain pesticide requirements and standards set forth in federal regulations as state requirements and standards. Makes changes concerning who may use certain pesticides and the circumstances under which the pesticides may be used. Authorizes the state chemist to enter a premises to access copies of records but allows the person holding records to defer the state chemist's access for up to ten days. Provides that the state chemist may enter public or private or property to investigate conditions possibly resulting from pesticide use only if the state chemist has reasonable suspicion of a violation. Requires the state chemist, in a proceeding involving multiple counts of repeated incidents of the same violation, to limit the imposition of a civil penalty to five counts. Provides that any findings related to a violation must be disclosed to the alleged violator before a penalty is assessed. Provides that, absent evidence of wrongdoing by the licensed pesticide business, any citation or civil penalty for a violation by an employee of a licensed pesticide business must be directed to the employee or the employee's supervisor instead of to the licensed pesticide business. Establishes requirements for individuals applying to become registered technicians. Establishes record keeping requirements for registered pesticide dealers, commercial applicators, and private applicators. Establishes restrictions and requirements concerning the application of pesticides on school property and pesticide use in a wellhead protection area. Sets forth acts for which the state chemist may impose a civil penalty or deny, suspend, or revoke a license, permit, or registration, including the application of a pesticide in a manner that allows it to drift from the target site, distributing a restricted use pesticide to a noncertified end user, and storing or disposing of a pesticide in violation of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requirements.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 216 on the official Indiana source →Action History
-
Public Law 29
-
Signed by the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker
-
Signed by the President Pro Tempore
-
Returned to the Senate without amendments
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 205: yeas 92, nays 4
-
Second reading: ordered engrossed
-
Representatives Cherry and Klinker added as cosponsors
-
Committee report: do pass, adopted
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
-
Referred to the House
-
Cosponsor: Representative Aylesworth
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 135: yeas 48, nays 0
-
House sponsor: Representative Bartels
-
Second reading: ordered engrossed
-
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
-
Senator Gaskill added as coauthor
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Environmental Affairs
-
Authored by Senators Walker K, Garten, Niemeyer
Sponsors
- Sheila Klinker · Cosponsor
- Robert Cherry · Cosponsor
- Mike Aylesworth · Cosponsor
- Steve Bartels · Primary
- Mike Gaskill · Cosponsor
- Rick Niemeyer · Primary
- Chris Garten · Primary
- Kyle Walker · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Steve Bartels Republican
- Rick Niemeyer Republican
- Chris Garten Republican
- Kyle Walker Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Sheila Klinker Democrat
- Robert Cherry
- Mike Aylesworth Republican
- Mike Gaskill Republican
Not signed on (142)
142 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 142 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 216 do?
- Requires the dean of agriculture of Purdue University to submit certain annual reports to the legislative council and the budget committee as well as to the governor. Makes several changes in the laws concerning pesticides and pesticide use and application. Adds and revises definitions of terms used in those laws. Provides for the adoption of certain pesticide requirements and standards set forth in federal regulations as state requirements and standards. Makes changes concerning who may use certain pesticides and the circumstances under which the pesticides may be used. Authorizes the state chemist to enter a premises to access copies of records but allows the person holding records to defer the state chemist's access for up to ten days. Provides that the state chemist may enter public or private or property to investigate conditions possibly resulting from pesticide use only if the state chemist has reasonable suspicion of a violation. Requires the state chemist, in a proceeding involving multiple counts of repeated incidents of the same violation, to limit the imposition of a civil penalty to five counts. Provides that any findings related to a violation must be disclosed to the alleged violator before a penalty is assessed. Provides that, absent evidence of wrongdoing by the licensed pesticide business, any citation or civil penalty for a violation by an employee of a licensed pesticide business must be directed to the employee or the employee's supervisor instead of to the licensed pesticide business. Establishes requirements for individuals applying to become registered technicians. Establishes record keeping requirements for registered pesticide dealers, commercial applicators, and private applicators. Establishes restrictions and requirements concerning the application of pesticides on school property and pesticide use in a wellhead protection area. Sets forth acts for which the state chemist may impose a civil penalty or deny, suspend, or revoke a license, permit, or registration, including the application of a pesticide in a manner that allows it to drift from the target site, distributing a restricted use pesticide to a noncertified end user, and storing or disposing of a pesticide in violation of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requirements.
- Who sponsors SB 216?
- SB 216 is sponsored by Sheila Klinker (Democrat), Robert Cherry, Mike Aylesworth (Republican), Steve Bartels (Republican), Mike Gaskill (Republican), Rick Niemeyer (Republican), Chris Garten (Republican), and Kyle Walker (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 216?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 216?
- Track SB 216 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 216
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 216
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →