HB 1369 — Family and juvenile law matters.
Last action — Public Law 70
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2024. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
10 sponsors
4 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (9 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Amends the definition for "act of rape", only for the purposes of IC 31-35-3.5 (termination of parent-child relationship of an individual who committed an act of rape), to include child molestation and sexual misconduct with a minor. Provides that the department of child services or a court shall consider ensuring the child's safety to be the most important consideration in the determination of a child's best interests under family and juvenile law. Provides that there is a rebuttable presumption that a child is a child in need of services if the state establishes that the child lives in the same household as an adult who was a perpetrator of a child fatality or near fatality that may have been the result of abuse, abandonment, or neglect. Adds sexual misconduct with a minor as an offense that may be alleged in a petition to terminate the parent-child relationship when a child is conceived as a result of the offense. Amends the circumstances under which a court may terminate the parent-child relationship with regard to a child in need of services.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 1369 on the official Indiana source →Action History
-
Public Law 70
-
Signed by the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the President Pro Tempore
-
Signed by the Speaker
-
House concurred in Senate amendments; Roll Call 246: yeas 89, nays 0
-
Motion to concur filed
-
Returned to the House with amendments
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 198: yeas 49, nays 0
-
Amendment #1 (Brown L) prevailed; voice vote
-
Reread second time: amended, ordered engrossed
-
Placed back on second reading
-
Senators Glick, Buck, Randolph added as cosponsors
-
Second reading: ordered engrossed
-
Committee report: do pass, adopted
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Referred to the Senate
-
Senate sponsors: Senators Brown L, Koch, Dernulc
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 99: yeas 94, nays 0
-
Second reading: amended, ordered engrossed
-
Amendment #2 (Jackson) motion withdrawn voice vote
-
Amendment #1 (McGuire) prevailed; voice vote
-
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
-
Coauthored by Representatives Jeter, Steuerwald, Goss-Reaves
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Authored by Representative McGuire
Sponsors
- Lonnie Randolph · Cosponsor
- James Buck · Cosponsor
- Susan Glick · Cosponsor
- Dan Dernulc · Primary
- Eric Koch · Primary
- Liz Brown · Primary
- Lori Goss-Reaves · Cosponsor
- Gregory Steuerwald · Cosponsor
- Chris Jeter · Cosponsor
- Julie McGuire · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 140 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Dan Dernulc Republican
- Eric Koch Republican
- Liz Brown Republican
- Julie McGuire Republican
Co-sponsors (6)
- Lonnie Randolph Democrat
- James Buck Republican
- Susan Glick Republican
- Lori Goss-Reaves Republican
- Gregory Steuerwald Republican
- Chris Jeter Republican
Not signed on (140)
140 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 140 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1369 do?
- Amends the definition for "act of rape", only for the purposes of IC 31-35-3.5 (termination of parent-child relationship of an individual who committed an act of rape), to include child molestation and sexual misconduct with a minor. Provides that the department of child services or a court shall consider ensuring the child's safety to be the most important consideration in the determination of a child's best interests under family and juvenile law. Provides that there is a rebuttable presumption that a child is a child in need of services if the state establishes that the child lives in the same household as an adult who was a perpetrator of a child fatality or near fatality that may have been the result of abuse, abandonment, or neglect. Adds sexual misconduct with a minor as an offense that may be alleged in a petition to terminate the parent-child relationship when a child is conceived as a result of the offense. Amends the circumstances under which a court may terminate the parent-child relationship with regard to a child in need of services.
- Who sponsors HB 1369?
- HB 1369 is sponsored by Lonnie Randolph (Democrat), James Buck (Republican), Susan Glick (Republican), Dan Dernulc (Republican), Eric Koch (Republican), Liz Brown (Republican), Lori Goss-Reaves (Republican), Gregory Steuerwald (Republican), Chris Jeter (Republican), and Julie McGuire (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1369?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1369?
- Track HB 1369 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1369
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1369
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →