HB 1310 — Children in need of services.
Last action — Public Law 69
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2024. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
12 sponsors
4 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (9 R · 3 D) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Provides that if a child has been removed from the child's parent for at least 12 of the most recent 22 months at the time of a periodic case review, the child's permanency plan must include at least one intended permanent or long term arrangement for care and custody of the child other than reunification of the child with the child's parent, guardian, or custodian. Provides that concurrent planning must be implemented if the child has been removed from the child's parent for at least 12 of the most recent 22 months at the time of a permanency hearing. Provides that the department may not: (1) take adverse action against a foster parent's license; or (2) remove a child from the home of a foster parent, relative of the child, or de facto custodian; on the basis of the foster parent, relative, or de facto custodian filing a notice with the court that a petition is required to be filed, but has not been filed, to terminate the parent-child relationship with regard to the child.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 1310 on the official Indiana source →Action History
-
Public Law 69
-
Signed by the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the President Pro Tempore
-
Signed by the Speaker
-
Returned to the House without amendments
-
Senator Randolph added as cosponsor
-
Senator Becker added as cosponsor
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 197: yeas 49, nays 0
-
Second reading: ordered engrossed
-
Senator Rogers added as cosponsor
-
Committee report: do pass, adopted
-
Senator Ford J.D. added as cosponsor
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Family and Children Services
-
Referred to the Senate
-
Representative Jackson added as coauthor
-
Cosponsor: Senator Donato
-
Senate sponsors: Senators Walker G, Johnson T, Gaskill
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 94: yeas 92, nays 0
-
Amendment #1 (Jackson) prevailed; voice vote
-
Representative Goss-Reaves added as coauthor
-
Second reading: amended, ordered engrossed
-
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
-
Representative Olthoff added as coauthor
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Family, Children and Human Affairs
-
Authored by Representative Lauer
Sponsors
- Lonnie Randolph · Cosponsor
- Vaneta Becker · Cosponsor
- Linda Rogers · Cosponsor
- J.D. Ford · Cosponsor
- Stacey Donato · Cosponsor
- Mike Gaskill · Primary
- Tyler Johnson · Primary
- Greg Walker · Primary
- Carolyn Jackson · Cosponsor
- Lori Goss-Reaves · Cosponsor
- Julie Olthoff · Cosponsor
- Ryan Lauer · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 138 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Mike Gaskill Republican
- Tyler Johnson Republican
- Greg Walker Republican
- Ryan Lauer Republican
Co-sponsors (8)
- Lonnie Randolph Democrat
- Vaneta Becker Republican
- Linda Rogers Republican
- J.D. Ford Democrat
- Stacey Donato Republican
- Carolyn Jackson Democrat
- Lori Goss-Reaves Republican
- Julie Olthoff Republican
Not signed on (138)
138 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 138 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1310 do?
- Provides that if a child has been removed from the child's parent for at least 12 of the most recent 22 months at the time of a periodic case review, the child's permanency plan must include at least one intended permanent or long term arrangement for care and custody of the child other than reunification of the child with the child's parent, guardian, or custodian. Provides that concurrent planning must be implemented if the child has been removed from the child's parent for at least 12 of the most recent 22 months at the time of a permanency hearing. Provides that the department may not: (1) take adverse action against a foster parent's license; or (2) remove a child from the home of a foster parent, relative of the child, or de facto custodian; on the basis of the foster parent, relative, or de facto custodian filing a notice with the court that a petition is required to be filed, but has not been filed, to terminate the parent-child relationship with regard to the child.
- Who sponsors HB 1310?
- HB 1310 is sponsored by Lonnie Randolph (Democrat), Vaneta Becker (Republican), Linda Rogers (Republican), J.D. Ford (Democrat), Stacey Donato (Republican), Mike Gaskill (Republican), Tyler Johnson (Republican), Greg Walker (Republican), Carolyn Jackson (Democrat), Lori Goss-Reaves (Republican), Julie Olthoff (Republican), and Ryan Lauer (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1310?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1310?
- Track HB 1310 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1310
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1310
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →