HB 1038 — Data security.
Last action — First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Removes the remedies from chapter 3 of the data security breach statute and adds a reference to relief available under chapter 4 of that statute. (Under current law, the maximum civil penalty in chapter 3 is $5,000 per deceptive act.) Changes the civil penalty under chapter 4 of the data security breach statute to $500,000 per deceptive act. (Under current law, the maximum civil penalty in chapter 4 is $150,000 per deceptive act.) Adds the following to the permissible remedies available for the attorney general to seek for a deceptive act: (1) Restitution for actual harm, but not less than $100 per Indiana resident who suffered actual harm. (2) The cost of administering restitution.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 1038 on the official Indiana source →Action History
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Referred to the Senate
-
Representative Andrade M added as coauthor
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 27: yeas 96, nays 0
-
Senate sponsor: Senator Koch
-
Representative Lauer added as coauthor
-
Second reading: ordered engrossed
-
Committee report: do pass, adopted
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Authored by Representative Jeter
Sponsors
- Eric Koch · Primary
- Mike Andrade · Cosponsor
- Ryan Lauer · Cosponsor
- Chris Jeter · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Eric Koch Republican
- Chris Jeter Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Mike Andrade Democrat
- Ryan Lauer Republican
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1038 do?
- Removes the remedies from chapter 3 of the data security breach statute and adds a reference to relief available under chapter 4 of that statute. (Under current law, the maximum civil penalty in chapter 3 is $5,000 per deceptive act.) Changes the civil penalty under chapter 4 of the data security breach statute to $500,000 per deceptive act. (Under current law, the maximum civil penalty in chapter 4 is $150,000 per deceptive act.) Adds the following to the permissible remedies available for the attorney general to seek for a deceptive act: (1) Restitution for actual harm, but not less than $100 per Indiana resident who suffered actual harm. (2) The cost of administering restitution.
- Who sponsors HB 1038?
- HB 1038 is sponsored by Eric Koch (Republican), Mike Andrade (Democrat), Ryan Lauer (Republican), and Chris Jeter (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1038?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1038?
- Track HB 1038 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1038
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1038
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →