Nonprofit organizations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1075 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1075.
You're tracking HB 1075
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1075 — Nonprofit organizations.
Last action — First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Provides that the contents of an investigative demand issued by the attorney general are confidential. Expands the definition of "public benefit corporation" to include a domestic corporation that is supported by public funds or authorized to spend public funds in furtherance of its mission or that is a not-for-profit corporation that aims to serve a public benefit. Provides that a court may dissolve a nonprofit corporation under certain circumstances and provides exceptions to the types of corporations that may be dissolved under this procedure. Specifies procedural requirements that the attorney general must take before petitioning the court for dissolution for certain reasons. Permits a court to appoint a receiver to manage a nonprofit corporation even if an action to dissolve the corporation has not been filed. Provides additional remedies that the attorney general may seek for violations. Requires a nonprofit corporation to maintain certain records for three years. Provides that attorney general may not access records of specified entities. Prevents a state agency from imposing certain filing or reporting requirements that are more burdensome than what is required by state law and provides certain exceptions. Makes conforming and clarifying changes.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 1075 on the official Indiana source →Action History
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Referred to the Senate
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 39: yeas 77, nays 19
-
Senate sponsor: Senator Freeman
-
Reread second time: amended, ordered engrossed
-
Amendment #6 (Jeter) prevailed; voice vote
-
Placed back on second reading
-
Second reading: amended, ordered engrossed
-
Amendment #2 (Hatfield) prevailed; voice vote
-
Amendment #1 (Moed) prevailed; voice vote
-
Amendment #4 (Jeter) prevailed; voice vote
-
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Authored by Representative Jeter
Sponsors
- Aaron Freeman · Primary
- Chris Jeter · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 148 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Aaron Freeman Republican
- Chris Jeter Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (148)
148 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 148 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1075 do?
- Provides that the contents of an investigative demand issued by the attorney general are confidential. Expands the definition of "public benefit corporation" to include a domestic corporation that is supported by public funds or authorized to spend public funds in furtherance of its mission or that is a not-for-profit corporation that aims to serve a public benefit. Provides that a court may dissolve a nonprofit corporation under certain circumstances and provides exceptions to the types of corporations that may be dissolved under this procedure. Specifies procedural requirements that the attorney general must take before petitioning the court for dissolution for certain reasons. Permits a court to appoint a receiver to manage a nonprofit corporation even if an action to dissolve the corporation has not been filed. Provides additional remedies that the attorney general may seek for violations. Requires a nonprofit corporation to maintain certain records for three years. Provides that attorney general may not access records of specified entities. Prevents a state agency from imposing certain filing or reporting requirements that are more burdensome than what is required by state law and provides certain exceptions. Makes conforming and clarifying changes.
- Who sponsors HB 1075?
- HB 1075 is sponsored by Aaron Freeman (Republican) and Chris Jeter (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1075?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1075?
- Track HB 1075 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1075
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1075
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →