HB 1063 — De novo judicial review of certain agency actions.
Last action — First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Requires a court to try disputed issues of fact de novo in a judicial review of certain agency actions. Provides that the burden of proving the validity of certain agency actions is the same as in the hearing before the agency. Requires the court in a judicial review of an agency action to review all issues of law and fact de novo and without deference to any previous interpretation made by the agency. Specifies that a monetary penalty issued by an agency may not be excessive and that a court may review a monetary penalty de novo to determine if the penalty is excessive.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 1063 on the official Indiana source →Action History
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Referred to the Senate
-
Third reading: passed; Roll Call 42: yeas 74, nays 17
-
Senate sponsor: Senator Koch
-
Representative Young J added as coauthor
-
Second reading: ordered engrossed
-
Committee report: amend do pass, adopted
-
Representative Wesco added as coauthor
-
Representative Bartels added as coauthor
-
First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Authored by Representative Jeter
Sponsors
- Chris Jeter · Primary
- Steve Bartels · Cosponsor
- Timothy Wesco · Cosponsor
- Eric Koch · Primary
- J Young · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Chris Jeter Republican
- Eric Koch Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Steve Bartels Republican
- Timothy Wesco Republican
- Young, J
Not signed on (145)
145 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 145 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1063 do?
- Requires a court to try disputed issues of fact de novo in a judicial review of certain agency actions. Provides that the burden of proving the validity of certain agency actions is the same as in the hearing before the agency. Requires the court in a judicial review of an agency action to review all issues of law and fact de novo and without deference to any previous interpretation made by the agency. Specifies that a monetary penalty issued by an agency may not be excessive and that a court may review a monetary penalty de novo to determine if the penalty is excessive.
- Who sponsors HB 1063?
- HB 1063 is sponsored by Chris Jeter (Republican), Steve Bartels (Republican), Timothy Wesco (Republican), Eric Koch (Republican), and Young, J.
- What is the current status of HB 1063?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1063?
- Track HB 1063 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1063
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1063
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →