Florida 2026 Session Status: Introduced 1 R cosponsors

SB 332 — Public Records and Public Meetings/Private Property Rights

Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 655 (Ch. 2026-142)

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Stalled 28% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Public Records and Public Meetings/Private Property Rights; Providing an exemption from public meetings requirements for meetings or portions of meetings between agencies and their attorneys to discuss certain claims concerning private property rights; requiring that such meetings be transcribed; providing that such transcripts become public records at specified times; providing for future legislative review and repeal of the exemptions; providing a statement of public necessity, etc.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

85 added · 115 removed

85 line(s) added, 115 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 332 By the Committees on Governmental Oversight and Accountability;
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 332 By the Committee on Judiciary;
and Judiciary;
and Senator Bradley 590-02242-26 2026332c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to public meetings;
and Senator Bradley 585-02770-26 2026332c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to public records and public meetings;
providing an exemption from public meetings requirements for meetings or portions of meetings between agencies and their attorneys to discuss certain claims concerning private property rights;
providing that specified entities may meet in private with their attorneys to discuss certain claims concerning private property rights;
specifying what may be discussed during such meetings;
specifying what may be discussed during such closed meetings;
providing an exemption from public records requirements for transcripts, recordings, minutes, and records generated during the exempt meetings or portions of such meetings;
providing for future legislative review and repeal;
providing for future legislative review and repeal of the exemptions;
Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act.— (1) A meeting or portion of a meeting between an agency as defined in s.
Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act.— (1) Notwithstanding s.
119.011, or the chief administrative or executive officer of an agency, and the agency’s attorney during the 90- day notice period specified in s.
286.011(1), any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, and the chief administrative or executive officer of the governmental entity may meet in private with the entity’s attorney during the 90-day-notice period specified in s.
70.001(4) to discuss claims submitted in accordance with that subsection is exempt from s.
70.001(4) to discuss claims submitted in accordance with that subsection provided that the following conditions are met:
Page 1 of 4 CODING:
(a) The entity’s attorney shall advise the entity at a public meeting that he or she desires advice concerning a claim Page 1 of 3 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 332 585-02770-26 2026332c2 286.011 and s.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 332 590-02242-26 2026332c1 submitted in accordance with s.
24(b), Art.
I of the State Constitution, provided that:
(a) The agency’s attorney shall advise the agency at a public meeting that he or she desires advice concerning a claim submitted in accordance with s.
The court reporter’s notes must be fully transcribed and filed with the agency’s clerk within a reasonable time after the meeting.
The court reporter’s notes must be fully transcribed and filed with the entity’s clerk within a reasonable time after the meeting.
(d) The agency shall give reasonable public notice of the time and date of the attorney-client session and the names of persons who will be attending the session.
(d) The entity shall give reasonable public notice of the time and date of the attorney-client session and the names of persons who will be attending the session.
The session must commence at an open meeting at which the persons chairing the meeting shall announce the commencement and estimated length of the attorney-client session and the names of the persons attending.
The session must commence at an open meeting at which the person chairing the meeting shall announce the commencement and estimated length of the attorney-client session and the names of the persons attending.
70.001, or upon the expiration of the statute of limitations for the claim arising under this chapter in the event that no litigation is filed and Page 2 of 4 CODING:
70.001, or upon the expiration of the statute of limitations for the claim arising under this chapter in the event that no litigation is filed and there is no settlement of a claim under s.
70.001.
(2) This section is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance with s.
119.15 and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2031, unless reviewed and saved from repeal Page 2 of 3 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 332 585-02770-26 2026332c2 there is no settlement of a claim under s.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for SB 332 590-02242-26 2026332c1 through reenactment by the Legislature.
70.001.
(2) Transcripts, recordings, minutes, and records generated during an exempt meeting or portion of such a meeting, pursuant to subsection (1), are exempt from s.
119.07(1) and s.
24(a), Art.
I of the State Constitution.
(3) This section is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance with s.
119.15 and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2031, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the Legislature.
(1) The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity that meetings or portions of meetings between an agency as defined in s.
The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity that meetings to discuss a presuit claim under the Bert J.
119.011, Florida Statutes, or the chief administrative or executive officer of an agency, and the agency’s attorney during the 90-day notice period specified in s.
Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act be made confidential and closed to the public.
70.001(4), Florida Statutes, to discuss claims submitted in accordance with that subsection be made exempt from s.
When those meetings are conducted in an open meeting, the governing body cannot effectively review, discuss, and prepare strategies for resolution of the claim.
286.011, Florida Statutes, and s.
24(b), Article I of the State Constitution, provided that certain conditions are met.
When those meetings are conducted in an open meeting, the agency cannot effectively review, discuss, and prepare strategies for resolution of the claim.
Making these meetings, or portions of these meetings, closed to the public encourages agencies to reasonably develop negotiation strategies that make prelitigation resolution more likely.
Making these hearings confidential and closed to the public encourages a local government to reasonably develop negotiation strategies that make presuit resolution more likely.
Requiring meetings relating to a Bert Harris claim to be public defeats the purpose of having a prelitigation claim process, namely, to foster settlement quickly while limiting attorney fees of all parties.
Requiring public hearings relating to a Bert Harris claim defeats the purpose of having a presuit claim process, namely, to foster settlement quickly while limiting attorney fees of all parties.
The public is protected by the requirement that the records of Page 3 of 4 CODING:
The public is protected by the requirement that the records of the meeting are open once the claim is settled.
Words stricken are deletions;
Show all 50 changed rows (10 more)
Previous
Latest
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 332 585-02770-26 2026332c2 the meeting be open once the claim is settled.
(2) The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity that the transcripts, recordings, minutes, and records generated during meetings or portions of meetings between an agency as defined in s.
119.011, Florida Statutes, or the chief administrative or executive officer of an agency, and the agency’s attorney during the 90-day notice period specified in s.
70.001(4), Florida Statutes, to discuss claims submitted in accordance with that subsection be made exempt from s.
119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s.
24(a), Article I of the State Constitution.
Release of such information during negotiations or settlement discussions would negate the public meeting exemption.
As such, the Legislature finds that the public record exemption is a public necessity.
Page 4 of 4 CODING:
Page 3 of 3 CODING:
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 655 (Ch. 2026-142) -SJ 548

  2. Substituted CS/CS/HB 655 -SJ 548

  3. Read 2nd time -SJ 548

  4. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/04/26

  5. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  6. Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 21 NAYS 0

  7. On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/24/26, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building

  8. CS/CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability read 1st time

  9. Now in Rules

  10. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  11. CS/CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 8 NAYS 0

  12. On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 02/11/26, 3:00 pm, 110 Senate Building

  13. CS by Judiciary read 1st time

  14. Now in Governmental Oversight and Accountability

  15. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  16. CS by Judiciary; YEAS 10 NAYS 0

  17. On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 01/27/26, 1:00 pm, 110 Senate Building

  18. Introduced

  19. Referred to Judiciary; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules

  20. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Favorable

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 17001
Democrat 4001
No Party Affiliation 0001
Total 21003
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (24)
Member Party Vote
Berman, Lori Democrat Yea
Davis, Tracie Democrat Yea
Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" Democrat Not Voting
Osgood, Rosalind Democrat Yea
Rouson, Darryl Ervin Democrat Yea
Pizzo, Jason W. B. No Party Affiliation Not Voting
Boyd, Jim Republican Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Brodeur, Jason Republican Yea
Burgess, Danny Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
DiCeglie, Nick Republican Yea
Gaetz, Don Republican Yea
Garcia, Ileana Republican Yea
Grall, Erin Republican Not Voting
Harrell, Gayle Republican Yea
Hooper, Ed Republican Yea
Martin, Jonathan Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea
Simon, Corey Republican Yea
Trumbull, Jay Republican Yea
Vacant Republican Yea
Wright, Tom A. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 8000
Democrat 2001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Berman, Lori Democrat Not Voting
Osgood, Rosalind Democrat Yea
Polsky, Tina Scott Democrat Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
DiCeglie, Nick Republican Yea
Gaetz, Don Republican Yea
Hooper, Ed Republican Yea
Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Trumbull, Jay Republican Yea
Yarborough, Clay Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 332 do?
Public Records and Public Meetings/Private Property Rights; Providing an exemption from public meetings requirements for meetings or portions of meetings between agencies and their attorneys to discuss certain claims concerning private property rights; requiring that such meetings be transcribed; providing that such transcripts become public records at specified times; providing for future legislative review and repeal of the exemptions; providing a statement of public necessity, etc.
Who sponsors SB 332?
SB 332 is sponsored by Bradley, Jennifer (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 332?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 332?
Track SB 332 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 332

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 332

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →