SB 332 — Public Records and Public Meetings/Private Property Rights
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 655 (Ch. 2026-142)
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Public Records and Public Meetings/Private Property Rights; Providing an exemption from public meetings requirements for meetings or portions of meetings between agencies and their attorneys to discuss certain claims concerning private property rights; requiring that such meetings be transcribed; providing that such transcripts become public records at specified times; providing for future legislative review and repeal of the exemptions; providing a statement of public necessity, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
85 added · 115 removed85 line(s) added, 115 removed.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 332 By the CommitteesCommittee on GovernmentalJudiciary; Oversight and Accountability;
and Judiciary;Senator Bradley 590-02242-26 2026332c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to public meetings;
and Senator Bradley 585-02770-26 2026332c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to public records and public meetings;
providing anthat exemptionspecified fromentities publicmay meetingsmeet requirementsin forprivate meetingswith or portions of meetings between agencies and their attorneys to discuss certain claims concerning private property rights;
specifying what may be discussed during such closed meetings;
providing an exemption from public records requirements for transcripts,future recordings,legislative minutes,review and recordsrepeal; generated during the exempt meetings or portions of such meetings;
providing for future legislative review and repeal of the exemptions;
Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act.— (1) ANotwithstanding meeting or portion of a meeting between an agency as defined in s.
119.011,286.011(1), any board or commission of any state agency or authority or any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation, or political subdivision, and the chief administrative or executive officer of anthe agency,governmental andentity may meet in private with the agency’sentity’s attorney during the 90-90-day-notice day notice period specified in s.
70.001(4) to discuss claims submitted in accordance with that subsection isprovided exemptthat fromthe s.following conditions are met:
(a) The entity’s attorney shall advise the entity at a public meeting that he or she desires advice concerning a claim Page 1 of 43 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 332 585-02770-26590-02242-26 2026332c22026332c1 286.011submitted andin accordance with s.
24(b), Art.
I of the State Constitution, provided that:
(a) The agency’s attorney shall advise the agency at a public meeting that he or she desires advice concerning a claim submitted in accordance with s.
The court reporter’s notes must be fully transcribed and filed with the agency’sentity’s clerk within a reasonable time after the meeting.
(d) The agencyentity shall give reasonable public notice of the time and date of the attorney-client session and the names of persons who will be attending the session.
The session must commence at an open meeting at which the personsperson chairing the meeting shall announce the commencement and estimated length of the attorney-client session and the names of the persons attending.
70.001, or upon the expiration of the statute of limitations for the claim arising under this chapter in the event that no litigation is filed and Pagethere 2is no settlement of 4a CODING:claim under s.
70.001.
(2) This section is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance with s.
119.15 and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2031, unless reviewed and saved from repeal Page 2 of 3 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 332 585-02770-26590-02242-26 2026332c22026332c1 therethrough isreenactment noby settlementthe ofLegislature. a claim under s.
70.001.
(2) Transcripts, recordings, minutes, and records generated during an exempt meeting or portion of such a meeting, pursuant to subsection (1), are exempt from s.
119.07(1) and s.
24(a), Art.
I of the State Constitution.
(3) This section is subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance with s.
119.15 and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2031, unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the Legislature.
(1) The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity that meetings orto portionsdiscuss ofa meetingspresuit betweenclaim anunder agencythe asBert definedJ. in s.
119.011,Harris, FloridaJr., Statutes,Private orProperty theRights chiefProtection administrativeAct orbe executivemade officerconfidential of an agency, and theclosed agency’sto attorney during the 90-daypublic. notice period specified in s.
70.001(4),When Floridathose Statutes,meetings toare discussconducted claimsin submittedan inopen accordancemeeting, withthe thatgoverning subsectionbody becannot madeeffectively exemptreview, fromdiscuss, s.and prepare strategies for resolution of the claim.
286.011, Florida Statutes, and s.
24(b), Article I of the State Constitution, provided that certain conditions are met.
When those meetings are conducted in an open meeting, the agency cannot effectively review, discuss, and prepare strategies for resolution of the claim.
Making these meetings,hearings orconfidential portionsand of these meetings, closed to the public encourages agenciesa local government to reasonably develop negotiation strategies that make prelitigationpresuit resolution more likely.
Requiring meetingspublic hearings relating to a Bert Harris claim to be public defeats the purpose of having a prelitigationpresuit claim process, namely, to foster settlement quickly while limiting attorney fees of all parties.
The public is protected by the requirement that the records of Pagethe 3meeting ofare 4open CODING:once the claim is settled.
Words stricken are deletions;
Show all 50 changed lines (10 more)
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2026 CS for CS for SB 332 585-02770-26 2026332c2 the meeting be open once the claim is settled.
(2) The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity that the transcripts, recordings, minutes, and records generated during meetings or portions of meetings between an agency as defined in s.
119.011, Florida Statutes, or the chief administrative or executive officer of an agency, and the agency’s attorney during the 90-day notice period specified in s.
70.001(4), Florida Statutes, to discuss claims submitted in accordance with that subsection be made exempt from s.
119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s.
24(a), Article I of the State Constitution.
Release of such information during negotiations or settlement discussions would negate the public meeting exemption.
As such, the Legislature finds that the public record exemption is a public necessity.
Page 43 of 43 CODING:
Show all 50 changed rows (10 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- S 332 c1 View text pdf
- S 332 c2 View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 332 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 655 (Ch. 2026-142) -SJ 548
-
Substituted CS/CS/HB 655 -SJ 548
-
Read 2nd time -SJ 548
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/04/26
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 21 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/24/26, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
CS/CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability read 1st time
-
Now in Rules
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 02/11/26, 3:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
Now in Governmental Oversight and Accountability
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Judiciary; YEAS 10 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 01/27/26, 1:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Judiciary; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Jennifer Bradley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Bradley, Jennifer Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| No Party Affiliation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Not Voting |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Not Voting |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 332 do?
- Public Records and Public Meetings/Private Property Rights; Providing an exemption from public meetings requirements for meetings or portions of meetings between agencies and their attorneys to discuss certain claims concerning private property rights; requiring that such meetings be transcribed; providing that such transcripts become public records at specified times; providing for future legislative review and repeal of the exemptions; providing a statement of public necessity, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 332?
- SB 332 is sponsored by Bradley, Jennifer (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 332?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 03, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 332?
- Track SB 332 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 332
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 332
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →