Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21.
You're tracking HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21 —
Last action — Defeated
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced March 25, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Failed a recorded vote
Failed 1 recorded vote so far — a real headwind.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
This Amendment to SS 1 for Senate Bill 21 clarifies that a corporation may require, as a condition to producing books and records to a stockholder under a Section 220 demand, that the stockholder agree that any information included in the corporation’s books and records produced to that stockholder is deemed incorporated by reference in any complaint filed by or at the direction of the stockholder in relation to the subject matter referenced in the demand. This Amendment to SS 1 for Senate Bill 21 also changes the standard in a proceeding brought by a stockholder under subsection (c) of Section 220 of Title 8 to compel the inspection of additional records to (1) reasonably identifying the documents the stockholder needs and making a showing such records exist (instead of a compelling need); and (2) demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence, or more likely than not, rather than the higher standard of clear and convincing evidence that such specific records are necessary and essential to the proceeding. This is intended to codify the standard for production of books and records set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in KT4 Partners LLC v. Palantir Techs. Inc., 203 A.3d 738 (Del. 2019).
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21 on the official Delaware source →Action History
-
Defeated
Sponsors
- Madinah Wilson-Anton · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 61 not signed on · 31 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (61)
61 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 61 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 8 | 17 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 31 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 20% | 76% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Parker Selby | — | Not Voting |
| Claire Snyder-Hall | Democratic | Nay |
| Cyndie Romer | Democratic | Nay |
| DeShanna U Neal | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Debra Heffernan | Democratic | Nay |
| Edward S. Osienski | Democratic | Nay |
| Eric Morrison | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Franklin D. Cooke | Democratic | Nay |
| Josue O Ortega | Democratic | Yea |
| Kamela T Smith | Democratic | Nay |
| Kendra Johnson | Democratic | Nay |
| Kerri Evelyn Harris | Democratic | Nay |
| Kimberly Williams | Democratic | Nay |
| Krista Griffith | Democratic | Nay |
| Larry Lambert | Democratic | Yea |
| Madinah Wilson-Anton | Democratic | Yea |
| Mara Gorman | Democratic | Nay |
| Melanie Ross Levin | Democratic | Nay |
| Melissa Minor-Brown | Democratic | Nay |
| Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha | Democratic | Nay |
| Sean M. Lynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Sherae'a Moore | Democratic | Yea |
| Sophie Phillips | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie T. Bolden | Democratic | Nay |
| William Bush | Democratic | Nay |
| William J. Carson | Democratic | Nay |
| Bryan W. Shupe | Republican | Nay |
| Charles S Postles Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Daniel B. Short | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Hilovsky | Republican | Nay |
| Jeffrey N. Spiegelman | Republican | Nay |
| Jesse R. Vanderwende | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin S Hensley | Republican | Nay |
| Lyndon D. Yearick | Republican | Nay |
| Michael F. Smith | Republican | Nay |
| Richard G. Collins | Republican | Nay |
| Ronald E. Gray | Republican | Nay |
| Shannon Morris | Republican | Nay |
| Timothy D. Dukes | Republican | Nay |
| Valerie Jones Giltner | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21 do?
- This Amendment to SS 1 for Senate Bill 21 clarifies that a corporation may require, as a condition to producing books and records to a stockholder under a Section 220 demand, that the stockholder agree that any information included in the corporation’s books and records produced to that stockholder is deemed incorporated by reference in any complaint filed by or at the direction of the stockholder in relation to the subject matter referenced in the demand. This Amendment to SS 1 for Senate Bill 21 also changes the standard in a proceeding brought by a stockholder under subsection (c) of Section 220 of Title 8 to compel the inspection of additional records to (1) reasonably identifying the documents the stockholder needs and making a showing such records exist (instead of a compelling need); and (2) demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence, or more likely than not, rather than the higher standard of clear and convincing evidence that such specific records are necessary and essential to the proceeding. This is intended to codify the standard for production of books and records set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in KT4 Partners LLC v. Palantir Techs. Inc., 203 A.3d 738 (Del. 2019).
- Who sponsors HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21?
- HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21 is sponsored by Madinah Wilson-Anton (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21?
- This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced March 25, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21?
- Track HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HA 5 to SS 1 for SB 21
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →