Delaware 153rd General Assembly Status: Failed 1 R cosponsors

HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300 —

Last action — Stricken

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced June 25, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Not enough signal yet

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

This amendment addresses fairness and due process in the discipline of licensees by DSP.

The amendment seeks to clarify vague terms in disciplinary actions by the DSP against licensees, ensuring due process. It allows contested warnings and proposes civil penalties that may include license suspension instead of full revocation.

Summary

This amendment addresses fundamental fairness and due process issues pertaining to DSP’s powers to discipline licensees (FFLs). The first issue is the inherent vagueness in the term “any other state law”, as written that term might mean a speeding ticket or a summons for a barking dog. The second issue is that of fundamental fairness and due process, allowing a licensee to contest a “warning” which could lead to harsher penalties for alleged subsequent violations. The third issue is also one of fundamental fairness and addresses the dual issues of the range of “fines” (civil penalty) and the vagueness engendered by the term “and cost” as it applies to an administrative procedure penalty. The fourth and final issue is the addition of a possible period of license suspension short of a full revocation. Again, an issue of fundamental fairness.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300 on the official Delaware source →

Action History

  1. Stricken

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 61 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (61)

61 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 61 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300 do?
This amendment addresses fundamental fairness and due process issues pertaining to DSP’s powers to discipline licensees (FFLs). The first issue is the inherent vagueness in the term “any other state law”, as written that term might mean a speeding ticket or a summons for a barking dog. The second issue is that of fundamental fairness and due process, allowing a licensee to contest a “warning” which could lead to harsher penalties for alleged subsequent violations. The third issue is also one of fundamental fairness and addresses the dual issues of the range of “fines” (civil penalty) and the vagueness engendered by the term “and cost” as it applies to an administrative procedure penalty. The fourth and final issue is the addition of a possible period of license suspension short of a full revocation. Again, an issue of fundamental fairness.
Who sponsors HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300?
HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300 is sponsored by Jeffrey N. Spiegelman (Republican).
What is the current status of HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300?
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced June 25, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300?
Track HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HA 7 to SS 1 for SB 300

Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →