Environmental Compliance Costs
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 964 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 964.
You're tracking SB 964
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 964 — Environmental Compliance Costs
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 1051 (Ch. 2021-222)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Environmental Compliance Costs; Redefining the term “environmental compliance costs” to include costs or expenses prudently incurred by an electric utility in complying with specified reclaimed water reuse requirements, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
17 added · 12 removed17 line(s) added, 12 removed.
Florida Senate - 2021 CS for SB 964 By Senatorthe DiazCommittee 36-00754-21on 2021964__Regulated AIndustries; bill to be entitled An act relating to environmental compliance costs;
and Senators Diaz and Taddeo 580-02310-21 2021964c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to environmental compliance costs;
9. Costs or expenses prudently incurred by an electric utility after July 1, 2021, pursuant to an agreement between the electric utility and a governmental wastewater utility for the exclusive purpose of the electric utility constructing and operating a wastewater reuse system where operation of the system will serve to further compliance with environmental laws or regulations that apply to the electric utility and where the system fully or partially satisfies a local government’s reclaimed water reuse requirements under s.
403.086,403.086. where at least 50 percent of the reclaimed water the reuse system produces is used in conjunction with the water requirements of an electrical generating facility or facilities owned by the electric utility.
At least 50 percent of the reclaimed water the system produces must be used in conjunction with the water requirements of an electrical generating facility or facilities owned by the electric utility in order to offset all or part of the electric utility’s water use authorized by permit.
View plain text versions (2)
- S 964 c1 View text Current html
- Introduced S 964 Filed html
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 1051 (Ch. 2021-222)
-
Substituted CS/HB 1051
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/21/21
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 15 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 04/20/21, 8:30 am, 412 Knott Building
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 04/16/21, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
CS by Regulated Industries read 1st time
-
Now in Rules
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
Introduced
-
CS by Regulated Industries; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Regulated Industries, 03/01/21, 4:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Regulated Industries
-
Favorable by Environment and Natural Resources; YEAS 6 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Environment and Natural Resources, 02/15/21, 3:30 pm, 37 Senate Building
-
Referred to Environment and Natural Resources; Regulated Industries; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Diaz · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Diaz
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Not Voting |
| Thurston | — | Not Voting |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ausley | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 964 do?
- Environmental Compliance Costs; Redefining the term “environmental compliance costs” to include costs or expenses prudently incurred by an electric utility in complying with specified reclaimed water reuse requirements, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 964?
- SB 964 is sponsored by Diaz.
- What is the current status of SB 964?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 964?
- Track SB 964 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 964
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 964
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →