SB 856 — Express Preemption of Fuel Retailers and Related Transportation Infrastructure
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 839 (Ch. 2021-111)
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Express Preemption of Fuel Retailers and Related Transportation Infrastructure; Prohibiting a municipality, county, special district, or political subdivision from taking certain actions to prohibit the siting, development, or redevelopment of fuel retailers and the related transportation infrastructure and from requiring fuel retailers to install or invest in a particular fueling infrastructure, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
66 added · 60 removed66 line(s) added, 60 removed.
Florida Senate - 2021 CS for CS for SB 856 By the CommitteesCommittee on CommunityRegulated Affairs;Industries;
and RegulatedSenator Industries;Hutson 580-02581-21 2021856c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to the state preemption of transportation energy infrastructure regulation;
and Senator Hutson 578-02922-21 2021856c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to the express preemption of fuel retailers and related transportation infrastructure;
prohibitingproviding alegislative municipality,findings; county, special district, or political subdivision from taking certain actions to prohibit the siting, development, or redevelopment of fuel retailers and the related transportation infrastructure and from requiring fuel retailers to install or invest in a particular fueling infrastructure;
preempting the regulation of transportation energy infrastructure to the state;
prohibiting a local government from taking specified actions relating to the regulation of transportation energy infrastructure;
proving exceptions;
1412 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
1614 Section 1. Section 377.707, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
377.707 Express377.707 State preemption of fueltransportation retailersenergy andinfrastructure relatedregulation.— transportation infrastructure.— (1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Fuel(a) “Fuel” retailer”includes, meansbut ais fuelnot stationlimited orto, retailpetroleum establishmentfuel, thatpetroleum sellsproducts, gasoline, diesel fuel, motor fuel, marine fuel, aviation fuel, renewable fuel, alternative fuel, natural gas fuel, hydrogen fuel, and electricity, when such fuel tosources provideare powerused tofor vehicles.transportation.
(b) “Related(b) “Transportation transportationenergy infrastructure” means undergroundinfrastructure storagesupporting tanks,the pipelines,production, orimportation, anystorage, relatedand equipmentdistribution thatof isfuel. necessary to dispense fuel at a fuel retailer.
(2) A(2) The municipality,Legislature county,recognizes specialthat district,affordable, orreliable, politicaland subdivisionsustainable mayenergy notthroughout dothis anystate is dependent upon transportation energy infrastructure networks extending beyond local government boundaries and recognizes the importance of consumer choice in the following:energy market.
(a) Adopt(3) The aregulation law, an ordinance, a regulation, a policy, or a resolution that prohibits the siting, development, or redevelopment of a fuel retailer or the related transportation energy infrastructure that is necessaryexpressly topreempted provide fuel to a fuel retailer within the entiretystate. of the jurisdictional boundary of the municipality, county, special district, or political subdivision.
(b) AdoptA orlocal applygovernment a law, an ordinance, a regulation, a policy, or a resolution that results in the de facto prohibition of a fuel retailer or the related transportation infrastructure that is necessaryprohibited tofrom providedoing fuelany to a fuel retailer within the entirety of the jurisdictionalfollowing: boundary of a municipality, county, special district, or political subdivision.
(c) Require(a) Adopting aor fuelimplementing retailerany tolaw, installordinance, regulation, policy, or investresolution inthat aprohibits, particularrestricts, kindor requires, or that has the effect of fuelingprohibiting, restricting, or requiring, the construction of new transportation energy infrastructure or the expansion, upgrading, or repair of existing transportation energy infrastructure, including,or butimposing notany limitedrequirement to,regulating electrictransportation vehicleenergy charginginfrastructure stations.that is more stringent than state law or department rule, except for local ordinances regulating petroleum storage system construction, operation, and maintenance which were enacted pursuant to section 376.317(3)(a).
45(b) Amending Thisits sectioncomprehensive doesplan, notland preemptuse amap, municipality,zoning county,districts, special district, or politicalland subdivisiondevelopment fromregulations adoptingin and implementing a law,manner an ordinance, a regulation, a policy, or a resolution that iswould notconflict otherwise inconsistent with generalan lawexisting relating to the siting, development, or redevelopment of fuel retailers or related transportation energy infrastructure necessaryclassification foras thema topermitted provideand fuel,allowable ifuse, suchincluding, law,but ordinance, regulation, policy, or resolution does not resultlimited into, aan deamendment factothat prohibitioncauses ofan fuelexisting retailers or related transportation energy infrastructure necessary to providebe fuela tononconforming fueluse, retailersstructure, from being sited, developed, or redevelopeddevelopment. within the entirety of the jurisdictional boundaries of the municipality, county, special district, or political subdivision.
Section(c) Imposing 2. Thisrequirements actthat shallare takemore effectstringent uponthan becomingstate alaw law.or rule.
(4) This section does not limit the authority of a local government to adopt, implement, modify, and enforce:
(a) Applicable federal and state requirements for transportation energy infrastructure, including safety and building standards;
or (b) Local safety and building standards that do not conflict with federal or state safety and security requirements for transportation energy infrastructure.
(5) Any existing or future law, ordinance, regulation, policy, or resolution that is contrary to this section is void.
Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2021.
View plain text versions (3)
- S 856 c1 View text html
- S 856 c2 View text Current html
- Introduced S 856 Filed html
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 839 (Ch. 2021-111)
-
Substituted CS/CS/HB 839
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/22/21
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 11 NAYS 5
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 04/20/21, 8:30 am, 412 Knott Building
-
CS/CS by Community Affairs read 1st time
-
Now in Rules
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Community Affairs; YEAS 6 NAYS 3
-
CS by Regulated Industries read 1st time
-
On Committee agenda-- Community Affairs, 03/16/21, 9:00 am, 37 Senate Building
-
Now in Community Affairs
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Regulated Industries; YEAS 7 NAYS 2
-
On Committee agenda-- Regulated Industries, 03/09/21, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Regulated Industries; Community Affairs; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Hutson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hutson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 29% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Nay |
| Farmer | — | Nay |
| Gibson | — | Nay |
| Powell | — | Nay |
| Thurston | — | Nay |
| Stargel | — | Not Voting |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Cruz | — | Nay |
| Powell | — | Nay |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Nay |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 856 do?
- Express Preemption of Fuel Retailers and Related Transportation Infrastructure; Prohibiting a municipality, county, special district, or political subdivision from taking certain actions to prohibit the siting, development, or redevelopment of fuel retailers and the related transportation infrastructure and from requiring fuel retailers to install or invest in a particular fueling infrastructure, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 856?
- SB 856 is sponsored by Hutson.
- What is the current status of SB 856?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 856?
- Track SB 856 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 856
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 856
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →