SB 686 — Offers of Judgment
Last action — Died in Rules
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Offers of Judgment; Authorizing parties to serve offers of judgment that make certain stipulations relating to attorney fees and costs; authorizing certain offerings of judgment relating to jointly owned property to require both individuals to either accept or reject the offer; providing requirements relating to grounds for challenging the validity of offers, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
49 added · 49 removed49 line(s) added, 49 removed.
Florida Senate - 2021 CS for CS for SB 686 By the CommitteesCommittee on BankingJudiciary; and Insurance;
and Judiciary;Senator Brandes 590-02141-21 2021686c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to offers of judgment;
and Senator Brandes 597-02689-21 2021686c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to offers of judgment;
The grounds for challenging the validity of the offer must be in writing and stated with specificity.specificity to enable the offeror to reevaluate the offer and make corrections, if warranted.
8687 For purposes of the determination required by paragraph (a), the term “judgment obtained” means the amount of the net judgment entered, plus any postoffer collateral source payments received or due as of the date of the judgment, plus any postoffer settlement amounts by which the verdict was reduced.
View plain text versions (3)
- S 686 c1 View text html
- S 686 c2 View text Current html
- Introduced S 686 Filed html
Action History
-
Died in Rules
-
Now in Rules
-
CS/CS by Banking and Insurance read 1st time
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Banking and Insurance; YEAS 8 NAYS 3
-
On Committee agenda-- Banking and Insurance, 03/10/21, 8:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
Introduced
-
Now in Banking and Insurance
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Judiciary; YEAS 6 NAYS 4
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 02/15/21, 2:30 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Referred to Judiciary; Banking and Insurance; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Brandes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Brandes
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 25% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Taddeo | — | Nay |
| Thurston | — | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Nay |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Not Voting |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 36% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Nay |
| Gibson | — | Nay |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Nay |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Not Voting |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 686 do?
- Offers of Judgment; Authorizing parties to serve offers of judgment that make certain stipulations relating to attorney fees and costs; authorizing certain offerings of judgment relating to jointly owned property to require both individuals to either accept or reject the offer; providing requirements relating to grounds for challenging the validity of offers, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 686?
- SB 686 is sponsored by Brandes.
- What is the current status of SB 686?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 686?
- Track SB 686 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 686
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 686
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →