Elections
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1372 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1372.
You're tracking SB 1372
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1372 — Elections
Last action — Died in Rules
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Elections; Deleting a provision that prohibits the use of an address appearing on identification presented by an elector at the polls as a basis to confirm an elector’s legal residence; revising requirements for eligibility to serve as a poll watcher; revising the timeframes for conducting public preelection testing of automatic tabulating equipment; prohibiting a person from providing, offering to provide, or accepting a pecuniary or other benefit in exchange for distributing, ordering, requesting, collecting, delivering, or otherwise physically possessing any vote-by-mail ballot, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
169 added · 212 removed169 line(s) added, 212 removed.
Florida Senate - 2020 CS for CS for SB 1372 By the CommitteesCommittee on Judiciary;Ethics and Elections;
and EthicsSenator andBrandes Elections;582-03042-20 20201372c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to elections;
and Senator Brandes 590-03952-20 20201372c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to elections;
104.0616, F.S.;
prohibiting a person from providing, offering to provide, or accepting a pecuniary or other benefit in exchange for distributing, ordering, requesting, collecting, delivering, or otherwise physically possessing any vote-by-mail ballot;
providing exceptions;
providing a penalty;
amending s.
901.15, F.S.;
authorizing a law enforcement officer to arrest a person without a warrant when probable cause exists that the person committed a specified violation involving a vote-by-mail ballot;
amending s.
preempting counties, municipalities, and other local governmental entities from enacting or adopting any limitation or restriction involving certain contributions and expenditures,expenditures; or establishing contribution limits different than those established in the Florida Election Code;
providing applicability;
3927 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
4129 Section 1. Paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of section 101.043, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
Section 7. Section7. Subsection 104.0616,(11) Floridais Statutes,added isto amendedsection 106.08, Florida Statutes, to read:
104.0616 Vote-by-mail ballots and voting;
violations.— (1) For purposes of this section, the term “immediate family” means a person’s spouse or the parent, child, grandparent, or sibling of the person or the person’s spouse.
(2) Any person who provides or offers to provide, and any person who accepts, a pecuniary or other benefit in exchange for distributing, ordering, requesting, collecting, delivering, or otherwise physically possessing any more than two vote-by-mail ballots, except per election in addition to his or her own ballot, or a ballot belonging to an immediate family member, or except as provided in ss.
101.6105-101.694, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s.
775.082, s.
775.083, or s.
775.084.
Section 8. Subsection (17) is added to section 901.15, Florida Statutes, to read:
901.15 When arrest by officer without warrant is lawful.—A law enforcement officer may arrest a person without a warrant when:
(17) There is probable cause to believe that a person has committed a violation involving a vote-by-mail ballot as provided in s.
104.0616.
Section 9. Subsection (11) is added to section 106.08, Florida Statutes, to read:
preemption.— (11)(a) A(11) A county, a municipality, or any other local governmental entity is expressly preempted from enacting or adopting:adopting any limitation or restriction involving:
1. Contribution(a) Contributions limitsto thata differpolitical fromcommittee theor limitationsan establishedelectioneering incommunications subsectionorganization. (1);
2. Any(b) Expenditures limitationfor oran restrictionelectioneering involvingcommunication contributions to a political committee or an electioneeringindependent communicationsexpenditure. organization;
orSection 3. Any8. This limitationact orshall restrictiontake oneffect expendituresJuly for1, an2020. electioneering communication or an independent expenditure.
(b) Any existing or future limitation or restriction enacted or adopted by a county, a municipality, or any other local governmental entity which is in conflict with this subsection is void.
Section 10. This act shall take effect July 1, 2020.
View plain text versions (3)
- S 1372 c1 View text html
- S 1372 c2 View text Current html
- Introduced S 1372 Filed html
Action History
-
Died in Rules
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
CS/CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 03/02/20, 12:00 pm, 110 Senate Building --Not Considered
-
Now in Rules
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Judiciary; YEAS 3 NAYS 2
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 02/19/20, 1:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
CS by Ethics and Elections read 1st time
-
Now in Judiciary
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Ethics and Elections; YEAS 6 NAYS 1
-
On Committee agenda-- Ethics and Elections, 02/03/20, 4:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Ethics and Elections; Judiciary; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Brandes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Brandes
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 33% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Nay |
| Hutson | — | Not Voting |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1372 do?
- Elections; Deleting a provision that prohibits the use of an address appearing on identification presented by an elector at the polls as a basis to confirm an elector’s legal residence; revising requirements for eligibility to serve as a poll watcher; revising the timeframes for conducting public preelection testing of automatic tabulating equipment; prohibiting a person from providing, offering to provide, or accepting a pecuniary or other benefit in exchange for distributing, ordering, requesting, collecting, delivering, or otherwise physically possessing any vote-by-mail ballot, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 1372?
- SB 1372 is sponsored by Brandes.
- What is the current status of SB 1372?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1372?
- Track SB 1372 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1372
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1372
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →