Florida 2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 470 — Searches of Cellular Phones and Other Electronic Devices

Last action — Died in Judiciary

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Searches of Cellular Phones and Other Electronic Devices; Expanding the grounds for issuance of a search warrant to include content held within a cellular phone, portable electronic communication device, or microphone-enabled household device when such content constitutes evidence relevant to proving that a felony has been committed; adopting the constitutional protection against unreasonable interception of private communications by any means for purposes of obtaining a search warrant; prohibiting the use of certain communication content in any trial, hearing or other proceeding which was obtained without a specified warrant, etc.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1239 added · 1222 removed

1239 line(s) added, 1222 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2020 SB 470 By Senator Brandes 24-00120-20 2020470__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to searches of cellular phones and other electronic devices;
Florida Senate - 2020 CS for SB 470 By the Committee on Criminal Justice;
and Senators Brandes and Bracy 591-01354-20 2020470c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to searches of cellular phones and other electronic devices;
redefining the term “oral communication”;
redefining the terms “oral communication” and “electronic communication”;
133 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
134 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
135 Section 1. Section 933.02, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
136 Section 1. Section 933.02, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
164 This section also applies to any papers or documents used as a means of or in aid of the commission of any offense against the laws of the state.
165 This section also applies to any papers or documents used as a means of or in aid of the commission of any offense against the laws of the state.
Section 4. Subsection (2) of section 934.02, Florida Statutes, is amended, and subsections (27) and (28) are added to that section, to read:
Section 4. Subsections (2) and (12) of section 934.02, Florida Statutes, are amended, and subsections (27) and (28) are added to that section, to read:
(12) “Electronic communication” means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, communication tower, satellite, electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photooptical system that affects intrastate, interstate, or foreign commerce, but does not include:
(a) Any wire or oral communication;
(b) Any communication made through a tone-only paging device;
(c) Any communication from an electronic or mechanical device which permits the tracking of the movement of a person or an object;
or (c)(d) Electronic funds transfer information stored by a financial institution in a communications system used for the electronic storage and transfer of funds.
39.201 368 to intercept and record incoming wire communications;
39.201 384 to intercept and record incoming wire communications;
656 A search warrant An order authorizing the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication shall, upon the request of the applicant, direct that a provider of wire or electronic communication service, landlord, custodian, or other person shall furnish the applicant forthwith all information, facilities, and technical assistance necessary to accomplish the interception unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the services that such service provider, landlord, custodian, or person is according the person whose communications are to be intercepted.
672 A search warrant An order authorizing the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication shall, upon the request of the applicant, direct that a provider of wire or electronic communication service, landlord, custodian, or other person shall furnish the applicant forthwith all information, facilities, and technical assistance necessary to accomplish the interception unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the services that such service provider, landlord, custodian, or person is according the person whose communications are to be intercepted.
and (b) There are grounds upon which a search warrant an order could be entered under this chapter to authorize such interception 730 may intercept such wire, oral, or electronic communication if an application for a search warrant an order approving the interception is made in accordance with this section within 48 hours after the interception has occurred or begins to occur.
and (b) There are grounds upon which a search warrant an order could be entered under this chapter to authorize such interception 746 may intercept such wire, oral, or electronic communication if an application for a search warrant an order approving the interception is made in accordance with this section within 48 hours after the interception has occurred or begins to occur.
795 The judge, upon the filing of a motion, may make available to such person or the person’s counsel for inspection such portions of the intercepted communications, applications, and search warrants orders as the judge determines to be in the interest of justice.
811 The judge, upon the filing of a motion, may make available to such person or the person’s counsel for inspection such portions of the intercepted communications, applications, and search warrants orders as the judge determines to be in the interest of justice.
888 Consistent with this paragraph, a judge of competent jurisdiction may authorize interception within this state, whether the interception is within or outside the court’s jurisdiction, if the application for the interception makes a showing that some activity or conspiracy believed to be related to, or in furtherance of, the criminal predicate for the requested interception has occurred or will likely occur, or the communication to be intercepted or expected to be intercepted is occurring or will likely occur, in whole or in part, within the jurisdiction of the court where the order is being sought.
904 Consistent with this paragraph, a judge of competent jurisdiction may authorize interception within this state, whether the interception is within or outside the court’s jurisdiction, if the application for the interception makes a showing that some activity or conspiracy believed to be related to, or in furtherance of, the criminal predicate for the requested interception has occurred or will likely occur, or the communication to be intercepted or expected to be intercepted is occurring or will likely occur, in whole or in part, within the jurisdiction of the court where the order is being sought.
2511(2)(d), authorized permitted the conduct complained of 952 shall constitute a complete defense to any civil or criminal, or administrative action arising out of such conduct under the laws of this state.
2511(2)(d), authorized permitted the conduct complained of 968 shall constitute a complete defense to any civil or criminal, or administrative action arising out of such conduct under the laws of this state.
(a) Intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided, or (b) Intentionally exceeds an authorization to access such facility, 966 and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection (2).
(a) Intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided, or (b) Intentionally exceeds an authorization to access such facility, 982 and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection (2).
and 2. There are grounds upon which a search warrant could be issued under this chapter to authorize such tracking, 1114 may engage in real-time location tracking if, within 48 hours after the tracking has occurred or begins to occur, a search warrant approving the tracking is issued in accordance with this section.
and 2. There are grounds upon which a search warrant could be issued under this chapter to authorize such tracking, 1130 may engage in real-time location tracking if, within 48 hours after the tracking has occurred or begins to occur, a search warrant approving the tracking is issued in accordance with this section.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Died in Judiciary

  2. Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

  3. CS by Criminal Justice read 1st time

  4. Introduced

  5. Now in Judiciary

  6. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  7. CS by Criminal Justice; YEAS 5 NAYS 0

  8. On Committee agenda-- Criminal Justice, 11/12/19, 10:30 am, 37 Senate Building

  9. Referred to Criminal Justice; Judiciary; Rules

  10. Filed

Sponsors

  • Brandes · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Brandes

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 470 do?
Searches of Cellular Phones and Other Electronic Devices; Expanding the grounds for issuance of a search warrant to include content held within a cellular phone, portable electronic communication device, or microphone-enabled household device when such content constitutes evidence relevant to proving that a felony has been committed; adopting the constitutional protection against unreasonable interception of private communications by any means for purposes of obtaining a search warrant; prohibiting the use of certain communication content in any trial, hearing or other proceeding which was obtained without a specified warrant, etc.
Who sponsors SB 470?
SB 470 is sponsored by Brandes.
What is the current status of SB 470?
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 470?
Track SB 470 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 470

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 470

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →