Substance Abuse Services
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 649 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 649.
You're tracking HB 649
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 649 — Substance Abuse Services
Last action — Laid on Table - Companion bill(s) CS/CS/SB 1120 passed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Substance Abuse Services; Requires exemption from disqualification from employment for certain substance abuse service provider personnel under certain circumstances; removes authority of DCF to grant exemptions from disqualification under certain circumstances; revises provisions relating to payment practices exempt from prohibitions on patient brokering.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
6 added · 6 removed6 line(s) added, 6 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 649 2020 A bill to be entitled An act relating to patient brokering;
1320a-7b(b)(3) or regulations promulgated adopted thereunder regardless of whether such discount, payment, waiver of payment, or payment practice involves items or services for which payment may be made in whole or in part under a federal healthcare programprograms as defined in 42 U.S.C.
1320a-7b(f), as that definition exists on MarchJuly 1, 2020.
This act shall take effect uponJuly becoming1, a2020. law.
hb0649-02-c2hb0649-01-c1
View plain text versions (4)
- H 649 c1 View text pdf
- H 649 c2 View text pdf
- H 649 c3 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 649 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Laid on Table - Companion bill(s) CS/CS/SB 1120 passed
-
Placed on Calendar
-
CS/CS/CS by Health and Human Services Committee read 1st time
-
Pending review of CS -under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS/CS/CS by- Health and Human Services Committee; YEAS 16 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Health and Human Services Committee, 02/18/20, 3:00 pm, Morris Hall
-
On Committee agenda-- Health and Human Services Committee, 02/12/20, 10:00 am, Morris Hall --Temporarily Postponed
-
Now in Health and Human Services Committee
-
CS/CS by Civil Justice Subcommittee read 1st time
-
Pending review of CS under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS/CS by Civil Justice Subcommittee; YEAS 13 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Civil Justice Subcommittee, 02/04/20, 3:30 pm, Sumner Hall
-
CS by Children, Families and Seniors Subcommittee read 1st time
-
Now in Civil Justice Subcommittee
-
Pending review of CS under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS by Children, Families and Seniors Subcommittee; YEAS 15 NAYS 0
-
PCS on Committee agenda-- Children, Families and Seniors Subcommittee, 01/22/20, 9:30 am, 12 HOB
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Children, Families and Seniors Subcommittee; Civil Justice Subcommittee; Health and Human Services Committee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Children · Primary
- Families and Seniors Subcommittee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Children
- Families and Seniors Subcommittee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (162)
162 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 162 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Cortes, J. | — | Yea |
| Duran | — | Yea |
| Goff-Marcil | — | Yea |
| Grant, M. | — | Yea |
| Magar | — | Yea |
| Pigman | — | Yea |
| Roach | — | Yea |
| Rodrigues, R. | — | Yea |
| Slosberg | — | Not Voting |
| Stevenson | — | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Diamond | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mercado | — | Yea |
| Omphroy | — | Yea |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Stone | — | Yea |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Yea |
| Antone, Bruce Hadley | Democrat | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| McClure, Lawrence | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Not Voting |
| Sirois, Tyler I. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ausley | — | Yea |
| Clemons | — | Yea |
| Cortes, J. | — | Yea |
| Fernandez-Barquin | — | Yea |
| Fetterhoff | — | Yea |
| Fitzenhagen | — | Yea |
| Newton | — | Yea |
| Polo | — | Yea |
| Ponder | — | Yea |
| Roach | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" | Republican | Yea |
| Smith, David | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 649 do?
- Substance Abuse Services; Requires exemption from disqualification from employment for certain substance abuse service provider personnel under certain circumstances; removes authority of DCF to grant exemptions from disqualification under certain circumstances; revises provisions relating to payment practices exempt from prohibitions on patient brokering.
- Who sponsors HB 649?
- HB 649 is sponsored by Children and Families and Seniors Subcommittee.
- What is the current status of HB 649?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 649?
- Track HB 649 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 649
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 649
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →