SB 7010 — OGSR/Servicemembers and the Spouses and Dependents of Servicemembers
Last action — Died in Messages
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
OGSR/Servicemembers and the Spouses and Dependents of Servicemembers; Amending a provision which provides a public records exemption for the identification and location information of servicemembers and the spouses and dependents of servicemembers; narrowing the exemption by requiring the servicemember to have been deployed to overseas service for the United States Department of Defense; revising the scheduled repeal of the exemption, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
35 added · 29 removed35 line(s) added, 29 removed.
Florida Senate - 2020 CS(PROPOSED forBILL) SBSPB 7010 FOR CONSIDERATION By the CommitteesCommittee on GovernmentalMilitary Oversightand Veterans Affairs and Accountability;Space 583-00887A-20 20207010pb A bill to be entitled An act relating to a review under the Open Government Sunset Review Act;
and Military and Veterans Affairs and Space 585-02219-20 20207010c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to a review under the Open Government Sunset Review Act;
Section 2. The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity to makeremove identificationthe andrequirement locationthat informationa ofservicemember currentsubmit ora formerwritten membersstatement ofthat thehe Armedor Forcesshe ofhas themade Unitedreasonable States,efforts ato reserveprotect componenttheir ofidentification theand Armedlocation Forcesinformation offrom thebeing Unitedaccessible States,through orother themeans Nationalavailable Guard,to whothe servedpublic afterin Septemberorder 11,to 2001,claim andthe theirpublic spousesrecords andexemption dependents,under exempt from s.
119.07(1),119.071(5)(k), Florida Statutes,Statutes. and s.
24(a),The Articlerequirement Iof a written statement of thereasonable Stateefforts Constitution,is regardlessan ofadded whetherburden suchon these individuals madeas reasonablewell effortsas toon protectagencies suchreceiving informationpublic fromrecords beingrequests. public.
ServicemembersThe performextent amongto thewhich mostservicemembers critical,must mostprotect effective,their andinformation mostfrom dangerouspublic operationsaccessibility in defenseorder ofto oursatisfy nation’sthe freedom.reasonable efforts standard is unclear.
TerroristIt groupsis continuealso tounclear threatenhow servicemembersmuch andproof theirof familiesreasonable andefforts encouragemade terroristby sympathizersan toindividual harmis servicemembersneeded andby theiran familiesagency withinin theorder Unitedto States.grant the exemption.
The Legislatureburden findson thatan allowingagency publicto accessverify towhether thethese individuals have protected from public disclosure their identification and location information ofadversely currentimpacts orthe formereffective servicemembers and theirefficient familiesadministration jeopardizesof thegovernment safetyin ofestablishing servicemembers,who theiris spouses,otherwise andeligible theirfor dependents.an exemption.
TheIn Legislature2017, finds that protecting the safetyLegislature andremoved security of current or former members of the Armedrequirement Forcesthat ofcertain theagency Unitedpersonnel States,could claim a reservepublic componentrecords ofexemption theonly Armedif Forcesreasonable ofefforts thehad Unitedbeen States,made orin theprotecting Nationalsuch Guard,information whofrom servedbeing afteraccessible Septemberthrough 11,other 2001,means andavailable theirto spousesthe and dependents, outweighs any public benefit that may be derived from thenumerous public disclosurerecords ofexemptions. the identification and location information.
Following the 2017 amendments, only two public records exemptions under current law, including the exemption for identification and location information for servicemembers, continue to impose that requirement.
Such inconsistencies among public records exemptions reduce accuracy and efficiency of redacting exempt information when a public records request for agency personnel information is made.
It is not in the public interest for the public to receive inaccurately redacted information.
View plain text versions (4)
- S 7010 pb View text html
- S 7010 c1 View text html
- S 7010 c2 View text Current html
- Introduced S 7010 Filed html
Action History
-
Died in Messages
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
In Messages
-
CS passed; YEAS 38 NAYS 1 -SJ 410, 411
-
Read 3rd time
-
Placed on 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
CS/CS by Rules read 1st time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/03/20
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by- Rules; YEAS 17 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/26/20, 9:00 am, 110 Senate Building
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/19/20, 10:00 am, 110 Senate Building --Temporarily Postponed
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/12/20, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Building --Temporarily Postponed
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 01/29/20, 1:30 pm, 110 Senate Building --Temporarily Postponed
-
Now in Rules
-
CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability read 1st time
-
Introduced
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 4 NAYS 1
-
On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 01/13/20, 1:00 pm, 301 Senate Building
-
Referred to Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules
-
Filed
-
Submitted as Committee Bill and Reported Favorably by Military and Veterans Affairs and Space; YEAS 7 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Military and Veterans Affairs and Space, 11/13/19, 10:00 am, 37 Senate Building
-
Submitted for consideration by Military and Veterans Affairs and Space
Sponsors
- Military and Veterans Affairs and Space · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Military and Veterans Affairs and Space
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 3% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Rader | — | Yea |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Taddeo | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Cruz | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Galvano | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Not Voting |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Book | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Rader | — | Nay |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Cruz | — | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 7010 do?
- OGSR/Servicemembers and the Spouses and Dependents of Servicemembers; Amending a provision which provides a public records exemption for the identification and location information of servicemembers and the spouses and dependents of servicemembers; narrowing the exemption by requiring the servicemember to have been deployed to overseas service for the United States Department of Defense; revising the scheduled repeal of the exemption, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 7010?
- SB 7010 is sponsored by Military and Veterans Affairs and Space.
- What is the current status of SB 7010?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 7010?
- Track SB 7010 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 7010
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 7010
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →