SB 1002 — Subpoenas
Last action — Laid on Table, refer to CS/HB 103
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Subpoenas; Revising the definition of “properly served”; authorizing an applicant to petition a court to compel compliance with a subpoena; authorizing a court to address noncompliance as indirect criminal contempt and impose a daily fine for a specified amount of time, etc.
Bill Text
- Introduced S 1002 Filed Current html
Action History
-
Laid on Table, refer to CS/HB 103
-
Substituted CS/HB 103
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/10/20
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Appropriations; YEAS 18 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 02/20/20, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Appropriations
-
Subcommittee Recommendation: Favorable by Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice; YEAS 6 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice, 01/28/20, 8:30 am, 37 Senate Building
-
Now in Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice
-
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 5 NAYS 0
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 01/15/20, 10:15 am, 110 Senate Building
-
Referred to Judiciary; Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice; Appropriations
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Ana Maria Rodriguez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 159 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (159)
159 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 159 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Not Voting |
| Hutson | — | Not Voting |
| Lee | — | Not Voting |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 0% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gainer | — | Yea |
| Taddeo | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Not Voting |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Not Voting |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1002 do?
- Subpoenas; Revising the definition of “properly served”; authorizing an applicant to petition a court to compel compliance with a subpoena; authorizing a court to address noncompliance as indirect criminal contempt and impose a daily fine for a specified amount of time, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 1002?
- SB 1002 is sponsored by Rodriguez, Ana Maria (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1002?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1002?
- Track SB 1002 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1002
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1002
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →