Guardianship
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 709 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 709.
You're tracking HB 709
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 709 — Guardianship
Last action — Laid on Table - Companion bill(s) CS/CS/SB 994 passed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Guardianship; Provides factors for court to consider when appointing guardian; provides guardian may only consent to or authorize do-not-resuscitate order with court approval; provides requirements for petition for appointment of guardian, annual guardianship report, & annual guardianship plan; requires court to make determination on certain petition within specified time; revises provisions relating to conflicts of interest.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
233 added · 181 removed233 line(s) added, 181 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 709 2020 A bill to be entitled An act relating to guardianship;
providing applicability;
providingrevising requirements of the initial guardianship plan;
providingrevising requirements for the annual guardianship report;
providingrevising requirements of the annual guardianship plan;
744.3725, F.S.;
requiring the court to make a determination on a certain petition within a specified time;
amending s.
744.312Page Considerations1 in appointment of guardian.—9 (3)CODING: The court shall also:
(e) Inquire into and consider potential disqualifications Page 1 of 7 CODING:
hb0709-00hb0709-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 709 2020 under744.312 s.Considerations in appointment of guardian.— (3) The court shall also:
(e) Inquire into and consider potential disqualifications under s.
the names and addresses of the next of kin of the alleged incapacitated person or minor, if known to the petitioner;Page 2 of 9 CODING:
the name of the proposed guardian and the reasons why she or he should be appointed guardian;
whether the proposed guardian is a professional guardian;
the relationship and Page 2 of 7 CODING:
hb0709-00hb0709-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 709 2020 previouspetitioner; relationship of the proposed guardian to the alleged incapacitated person or minor ward;
the name of the proposed guardian and the reasons why she or he should be appointed guardian;
whether the proposed guardian is a professional guardian;
the relationship and previous relationship of the proposed guardian to the alleged incapacitated person or minor ward;
744.309(2)744.309(2). The petition for appointment of a professional guardian must comply with the provisions of subsection (1), and must state that the petitioner is a professional guardian.
This subsection does not apply to Page 3 of 79 CODING:
hb0709-00hb0709-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 709 2020 Sectiona 4.public guardian appointed under s.
744.2006 who seeks appointment as a guardian of a person of limited financial means and whose compensation as the guardian for such person is paid by the Office of Public and Professional Guardians or any local government The petition for appointment of a professional guardian must comply with the provisions of subsection (1), and must state that the petitioner is a professional guardian.
Section 4.
(f) A list of any preexisting do-not-resuscitate orders executedPage under4 s.of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0709-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 709 2020 executed under s.
Subsection (3) of section 744.367, Florida PageStatutes, 4is ofamended 7to CODING:read:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0709-00 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB 709 2020 Statutes, is amended to read:
SectionPage 6.5 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0709-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 709 2020 Section 6.
Page(1) 5Each ofplan 7for CODING:an adult ward must, if applicable, include:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Show all 67 changed lines (27 more)
hb0709-00 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB 709 2020 (1) Each plan for an adult ward must, if applicable, include:
Section 744.3725, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
744.3725 Procedure for extraordinary authority.— (1) Before the court may grant authority to a guardian to exercise any of the rights specified in s.
744.3215(4), the court must:
(a)(1) Appoint an independent attorney to act on the incapacitated person's behalf, and the attorney must have the opportunity to meet with the person and to present evidence and Page 6 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0709-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 709 2020 cross-examine witnesses at any hearing on the petition for authority to act.;
(b)(2) Receive as evidence independent medical, psychological, and social evaluations with respect to the incapacitated person by competent professionals or appoint its own experts to assist in the evaluations.;
(c)(3) Personally meet with the incapacitated person to obtain its own impression of the person's capacity, so as to afford the incapacitated person the full opportunity to express his or her personal views or desires with respect to the judicial proceeding and issue before the court.;
(d)(4) Find by clear and convincing evidence that the person lacks the capacity to make a decision about the issue before the court and that the incapacitated person's capacity is not likely to change in the foreseeable future.;
and (e)(5) Be persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that the authority being requested is in the best interests of the incapacitated person.
(2) The court must make a determination within 72 hours after the filing of a petition under s.
744.3215(4)(f), if the court finds, based on the facts presented by the guardian and any accompanying documents, that the ward is experiencing an exigent circumstance such that a decision on whether to resuscitate is likely to be required within 14 days after the petition was filed.
Page 7 of 9 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0709-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 709 2020 (3) The provisions of This section and s.
744.3215(4) are procedural and do not establish any new or independent right to or authority over the termination of parental rights, dissolution of marriage, sterilization, abortion, or the termination of life support systems.
Section 8.
(3)(2) Unless prior approval is obtained by court order, or unless such relationship existed before prior to appointment of the guardian and is disclosed to the court in the petition Pagefor 6appointment of 7guardian, CODING:a guardian may not:
(a) Have any interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, in any business transaction or activity with the ward, the judge presiding over the case, any member of the appointed Page 8 of 9 CODING:
hb0709-00hb0709-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 709 2020 forexamining appointmentcommittee, ofany guardian,court aemployee guardianinvolved mayin not:the guardianship process, or the attorney for the ward;
(a) Have any interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, in any business transaction or activity with the ward, the judge presiding over the case, any member of the appointed examining committee, any court employee involved in the guardianship process, or the attorney for the ward;
Section 8.9.
Page 79 of 79 CODING:
hb0709-00hb0709-01-c1
Show all 67 changed rows (27 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- H 709 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 709 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Laid on Table - Companion bill(s) CS/CS/SB 994 passed
-
Placed on Calendar
-
CS by Health and Human Services Committee read 1st time
-
Pending review of CS -under Rule 7.18(c)
-
CS by- Health and Human Services Committee; YEAS 15 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Health and Human Services Committee, 01/30/20, 9:00 am, Morris Hall
-
Now in Health and Human Services Committee
-
Favorable by Justice Appropriations Subcommittee; YEAS 11 NAYS 0
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Justice Appropriations Subcommittee, 01/15/20, 3:30 pm, Morris Hall
-
Now in Justice Appropriations Subcommittee
-
Favorable by Children, Families and Seniors Subcommittee; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Children, Families and Seniors Subcommittee, 12/12/19, 9:00 am, 12 HOB
-
Referred to Children, Families and Seniors Subcommittee; Justice Appropriations Subcommittee; Health and Human Services Committee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Colleen Burton · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Burton, Colleen Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Cortes, J. | — | Yea |
| Duran | — | Yea |
| Goff-Marcil | — | Yea |
| Grant, M. | — | Yea |
| Magar | — | Not Voting |
| Pigman | — | Yea |
| Ponder | — | Yea |
| Roach | — | Not Voting |
| Rodrigues, R. | — | Yea |
| Slosberg | — | Yea |
| Stevenson | — | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Not Voting |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beltran | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Fernandez-Barquin | — | Yea |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Pritchett | — | Yea |
| Renner | — | Yea |
| Silvers | — | Yea |
| Slosberg | — | Yea |
| Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 0% | 0% | 40% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ausley | — | Yea |
| Clemons | — | Not Voting |
| Cortes, J. | — | Yea |
| Fernandez-Barquin | — | Yea |
| Fetterhoff | — | Yea |
| Fitzenhagen | — | Not Voting |
| Newton | — | Yea |
| Polo | — | Yea |
| Ponder | — | Yea |
| Roach | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" | Republican | Not Voting |
| Smith, David | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 709 do?
- Guardianship; Provides factors for court to consider when appointing guardian; provides guardian may only consent to or authorize do-not-resuscitate order with court approval; provides requirements for petition for appointment of guardian, annual guardianship report, & annual guardianship plan; requires court to make determination on certain petition within specified time; revises provisions relating to conflicts of interest.
- Who sponsors HB 709?
- HB 709 is sponsored by Burton, Colleen (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 709?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 709?
- Track HB 709 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 709
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 709
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →