SR 214 — Philosophies that Espouse Superiority
Last action — Adopted
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Philosophies that Espouse Superiority; (THIS BILL COMBINES SR's 214 & 222) Rejecting and condemning any philosophy that espouses the superiority of one group of people over another which is hateful, dangerous, or a morally corrupt expression of intolerance, and affirming that such philosophies are contradictory to the values that define the people of Florida and the United States, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
12 added · 15 removed12 line(s) added, 15 removed.
Florida Senate - 2020 (NP) CS for CS for SR's 214 & 222 By the CommitteesCommittee on Judiciary;Infrastructure and Security;
and InfrastructureSenators Rodriguez, Simpson, Cruz, Stewart, Benacquisto, Bradley, Hutson, Mayfield, Diaz, Wright, Perry, Harrell, Albritton, and Security;Hooper 596-02232-20 2020214c1 Senate Resolution A resolution rejecting and condemning any philosophy that espouses the superiority of one group of people over another which is hateful, dangerous, or a morally corrupt expression of intolerance, and affirming that such philosophies are contradictory to the values that define the people of Florida and the United States.
and9 SenatorsWHEREAS, Rodriguez,recent Simpson,acts Cruz,of Stewart,domestic Benacquisto,terror, Bradley,including Hutson,acts Mayfield,of Diaz,mass Wright,violence, Perry,have Harrell,shocked Albritton, and Hoopersaddened 590-03958-20our 2020214c2nation, Senateand ResolutionWHEREAS, Athis resolutionmurderous rejectingviolence andwas condemningperpetrated anyby philosophyindividuals who embraced philosophies that espousesespouse the superiority of one group of people over another whichon isthe hateful,basis dangerous,of race, color, national origin, sex, or areligion, morallyand corruptWHEREAS, expressionthese ofphilosophies intolerance,are embraced by groups which include white nationalists, white supremacists, “incels”, and affirmingothers, thatand suchWHEREAS, these philosophies are contradictory to the valuesvalues, thatconstitutional defineprotections, and moral fiber of the peopleUnited States of FloridaAmerica and the UnitedState States.of Florida, NOW, THEREFORE, 23 Be It Resolved by the Senate of the State of Florida:
925 WHEREAS,That recentthe actsFlorida ofSenate domesticrejects terror, including acts of mass violence, have shocked and saddenedcondemns ourany nation,philosophy and WHEREAS, this murderous violence was perpetrated by individuals who embraced philosophies that espouseespouses the superiority of one group of people over another on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, or disability,religion andas WHEREAS,hateful, thesedangerous, philosophies are embraced by groups which include white nationalists, white supremacists, “incels”, and others,morally andcorrupt WHEREAS,expressions these philosophies are contradictory to the values, constitutional protections, and moral fiber of theintolerance; United States of America and the State of Florida, NOW, THEREFORE, 23 Be It Resolved by the Senate of the State of Florida:
25 That the Florida Senate rejects and condemns any philosophy that incites one group of people against another on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, or disability, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Florida Senate rejects and condemns the philosophies embraced by white nationalists and white supremacists, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Florida Senate affirms that such philosophies are contradictory to the values that define the people of Florida and the United States.
View plain text versions (3)
- S 214 c1 View text html
- S 214 c2 View text Current html
- Introduced S 214 Filed html
Action History
-
Adopted
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/05/20
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 17 NAYS 0
-
CS/CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 03/02/20, 12:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
Now in Rules
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Judiciary; YEAS 6 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 02/19/20, 1:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 01/28/20, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Building --Temporarily Postponed
-
CS by Infrastructure and Security read 1st time
-
Now in Judiciary
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
Introduced
-
CS by Infrastructure and Security; YEAS 7 NAYS 0
-
CS combines this bill with SR 222
-
On Committee agenda-- Infrastructure and Security, 01/13/20, 3:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
Referred to Infrastructure and Security; Judiciary; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Ana Maria Rodriguez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 159 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (159)
159 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 159 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Book | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Braynon | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Montford | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Benacquisto | — | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SR 214 do?
- Philosophies that Espouse Superiority; (THIS BILL COMBINES SR's 214 & 222) Rejecting and condemning any philosophy that espouses the superiority of one group of people over another which is hateful, dangerous, or a morally corrupt expression of intolerance, and affirming that such philosophies are contradictory to the values that define the people of Florida and the United States, etc.
- Who sponsors SR 214?
- SR 214 is sponsored by Rodriguez, Ana Maria (Republican).
- What is the current status of SR 214?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SR 214?
- Track SR 214 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SR 214
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SR 214
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →