SB 914 — Contingency Risk Multipliers
Last action — Died in Rules
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Contingency Risk Multipliers; Providing that, for certain attorney fees awarded for claims arising under property insurance policies, a strong presumption is created that a lodestar fee is sufficient and reasonable; providing that such presumption may be rebutted only under certain circumstances, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
24 added · 47 removed24 line(s) added, 47 removed.
Florida Senate - 2020 CS for SB 914 By Senatorthe BrandesCommittee 24-01110-20on 2020914__Banking Aand billInsurance; to be entitled An act relating to property insurance;
and Senator Brandes 597-02424-20 2020914c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to contingency risk multipliers;
providing that, for certain attorney fees awarded for claims arising under property insurance policies, thea maximumstrong feepresumption ais courtcreated maythat awarda lodestar fee is asufficient lodestarand fee;reasonable;
prohibitingproviding thethat courtsuch frompresumption consideringmay contingencybe riskrebutted oronly usingunder acertain contingencycircumstances; risk multiplier;
amending s.
627.736, F.S.;
conforming a provision to changes made by the act;
1211 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
1413 Section 1. Subsection (4) is added to section 627.428, Florida Statutes, to read:
627.428 Attorney fees.— (4) In awardingan award of attorney fees under this section for a claim arising under a property insurance policy, thea maximumstrong feepresumption ais courtcreated maythat awarda lodestar fee is asufficient lodestarand fee.reasonable.
ASuch courtpresumption may notbe considerrebutted contingencyonly risk in determininga therare lodestarand feeexceptional orcircumstance usewith aevidence contingencythat riskcompetent multipliercounsel tocould increasenot thebe lodestarretained fee.in a reasonable manner.
Section 2. Subsection2. This (8)act ofshall sectiontake 627.736,effect FloridaJuly Statutes,1, is2020. amended to read:
627.736 Required personal injury protection benefits;
exclusions;
priority;
claims.— (8) APPLICABILITY OF PROVISION REGULATING ATTORNEY FEES.
With respect to any dispute under the provisions of ss.
627.730 627.7405 between the insured and the insurer, or between an assignee of an insured’s rights and the insurer, the provisions of ss.
627.428 and 768.79 apply, except as provided in subsections (10) and (15), and except that any attorney fees recovered must:
(a) Comply with prevailing professional standards;
(b) Not overstate or inflate the number of hours reasonably necessary for a case of comparable skill or complexity;
and (c) Represent legal services that are reasonable and necessary to achieve the result obtained.
39 Upon request by either party, a judge must make written findings, substantiated by evidence presented at trial or any hearings associated therewith, that any award of attorney fees complies with this subsection.
Notwithstanding s.
627.428, Attorney fees recovered under ss.
627.730-627.7405 must be calculated without regard to a contingency risk multiplier.
Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2020.
View plain text versions (2)
- S 914 c1 View text Current html
- Introduced S 914 Filed html
Action History
-
Died in Rules
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
Now in Rules
-
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 4 NAYS 2
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 02/04/20, 12:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
CS by Banking and Insurance read 1st time
-
Now in Judiciary
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Banking and Insurance; YEAS 5 NAYS 3
-
On Committee agenda-- Banking and Insurance, 01/21/20, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Banking and Insurance; Judiciary; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Brandes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Brandes
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Lee | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Taddeo | — | Nay |
| Thurston | — | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Nay |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 914 do?
- Contingency Risk Multipliers; Providing that, for certain attorney fees awarded for claims arising under property insurance policies, a strong presumption is created that a lodestar fee is sufficient and reasonable; providing that such presumption may be rebutted only under certain circumstances, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 914?
- SB 914 is sponsored by Brandes.
- What is the current status of SB 914?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 914?
- Track SB 914 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 914
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 914
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →