Florida 2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 1766 — Growth Management

Last action — Died in Rules

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Growth Management; Revising notice of claim requirements for property owners; specifying that property owners retain the option to have a court determine awards of compensation; authorizing property owners to bring actions to declare prohibited exactions invalid; requiring the Department of Transportation to afford a right of first refusal to the previous property owner before disposing of property in certain circumstances, etc.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

381 added · 427 removed

381 line(s) added, 427 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2020 SB 1766 By Senator Lee 20-00931C-20 20201766__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to growth management;
Florida Senate - 2020 CS for SB 1766 By the Committee on Judiciary;
and Senators Lee and Perry 590-03113-20 20201766c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to growth management;
revising legislative intent;
creating a presumption that certain settlements of claims apply to all similarly situated residential properties within a political subdivision under certain circumstances;
specifying when properties are considered similarly situated;
29 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
24 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
31 Section 1. Subsections (1), (4), (5), and (6) and paragraph (a) of subsection (11) of section 70.001, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
26 Section 1. Subsections (4), (5), and (6) and paragraph (a) of subsection (11) of section 70.001, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
70.001 Private property rights protection.— (1) This act may be cited as the “Bert J.
70.001 Private property rights protection.— (4)(a) Not less than 90 150 days before prior to filing an action under this section against a governmental entity, a property owner who seeks compensation under this section must present the claim in writing to the head of the governmental entity, except that if the property is classified as agricultural pursuant to s.
Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act.” The Legislature recognizes that some laws, regulations, and ordinances of the state and political entities in the state, as applied, may inordinately burden, restrict, or limit private property rights without amounting to a taking under the State Constitution or the United States Constitution.
The Legislature determines that there is an important state interest in protecting the interests of private property owners from such inordinate burdens.
The Legislature further recognizes that it is in the public interest to ensure that all similarly situated residential properties are subject to the same rules and regulations.
Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature that, as a separate and distinct cause of action from the law of takings, the Legislature herein provides for relief, or payment of compensation, when a new law, rule, regulation, or ordinance of the state or a political entity in the state, as applied, unfairly affects real property.
(4)(a) Not less than 90 150 days before prior to filing an action under this section against a governmental entity, a property owner who seeks compensation under this section must present the claim in writing to the head of the governmental entity, except that if the property is classified as agricultural pursuant to s.
103 If the property owner accepts a settlement offer, either before or after filing an action, the governmental entity may implement the settlement offer by appropriate development agreement;
81 If the property owner accepts a settlement offer, either before or after filing an action, the governmental entity may implement the settlement offer by appropriate development agreement;
3. When a residential property owner submits a claim under this section which is based on a governmental entity’s application of a regulation or ordinance to more than one residential parcel, and the governmental entity reaches a settlement of such claim or the property owner secures a judgment declaring an inordinate burden under paragraph (6)(a), there shall be a presumption, rebuttable only by clear and convincing evidence, that similarly situated residential parcels, as evaluated on a parcel-by-parcel basis, have been inordinately burdened and are entitled to equivalent terms of settlement or a judicial determination of an inordinate burden.
109 This paragraph applies to any settlement reached between a property owner and a governmental entity regardless of when the settlement agreement was entered so long as the agreement fully resolves all claims asserted under this section.
In such cases, the similarly situated residential property owners must submit the appraisal specified in paragraph (a) not less than 120 days before a trial on the merits of the damages portion of the proceedings pursuant to paragraph (6)(b).
During the 90-day-notice period of such claims, the governmental entity shall negotiate terms of settlement consistent with settlement agreements for similarly situated residential parcels.
For the purposes of this subparagraph, properties are similarly situated only if improvements authorized under zoning code and use restrictions have been constructed on the property and the governing body has issued a certificate of occupancy and if the properties are proximate in location and are subject to identical zoning code and use restrictions.
155 This paragraph applies to any settlement reached between a property owner and a governmental entity regardless of when the settlement agreement was entered so long as the agreement fully resolves all claims asserted under this section.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Died in Rules

  2. Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

  3. On Committee agenda-- Rules, 03/02/20, 12:00 pm, 110 Senate Building --Not Considered

  4. Now in Rules

  5. Favorable by Community Affairs; YEAS 5 NAYS 0

  6. CS by Judiciary read 1st time

  7. On Committee agenda-- Community Affairs, 02/10/20, 4:00 pm, 301 Senate Building

  8. Now in Community Affairs

  9. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  10. CS by Judiciary; YEAS 6 NAYS 0

  11. On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 02/04/20, 12:30 pm, 110 Senate Building

  12. Introduced

  13. Referred to Judiciary; Community Affairs; Rules

  14. Filed

Sponsors

  • Lee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Lee

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Favorable

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4000
No Party Affiliation 1000
Total 5000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (5)
Member Party Vote
Broxson — Yea
Simmons — Yea
Farmer — Yea
Flores — Yea
Pizzo, Jason W. B. No Party Affiliation Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1766 do?
Growth Management; Revising notice of claim requirements for property owners; specifying that property owners retain the option to have a court determine awards of compensation; authorizing property owners to bring actions to declare prohibited exactions invalid; requiring the Department of Transportation to afford a right of first refusal to the previous property owner before disposing of property in certain circumstances, etc.
Who sponsors SB 1766?
SB 1766 is sponsored by Lee.
What is the current status of SB 1766?
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1766?
Track SB 1766 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1766

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1766

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →