SB 710 — Administrative Review of Property Taxes
Last action — Died in Finance and Tax
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
100 added · 87 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 710 adds provisions that clarify the term "good cause" and allow certain counties to request information about specific dates when property appraisers and petitioners are unavailable for hearings. This change is important because it provides a clearer process for handling property tax assessment disputes, making it easier for counties to manage scheduling and for taxpayers to understand their rights. The bill maintains the requirement for signatures or written authorization when filing petitions, ensuring accountability in the appeals process.
Florida Senate - 2019 CS for SB 710 By Senator Baxley 12-01228-19 2019710__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to the administrativeCommittee reviewon ofCommunity propertyAffairs; taxes;
and Senator Baxley 578-03294-19 2019710c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to the administrative review of property taxes;
revising the definition of the term “good cause” to exclude certain circumstances;circumstances in certain counties;
authorizing clerks of county governing bodies of such counties, within a certain timeframe, to request property appraisers and petitioners to identify certain dates of unavailability for hearing;
1217 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
1419 Section 1. Present paragraph (h) of subsection (3) of section 194.011, Florida Statutes, is redesignated as paragraph (i), and a new paragraph (h) is added to that subsection, to read:
Late-filedA petitionslate-filed petition must be filed within 3055 days after the 25th day following the mailing of the notice by the property appraiser.
TheHowever, for a county in which the number of petitions filed exceeds 5,000 in any year, the term does not include being scheduled for two separate hearings in different jurisdictions at the same time or on the same date.date, unless the hearings involve the same petitioner or property appraiser and the petitioner agrees to reschedule the hearing.
For counties in which the number of petitions filed exceeds 5,000 in any year, before the value adjustment board begins its hearings for the year, the clerk may request that the property appraiser and the petitioner identify up to 10 business days each on which he or she is unavailable for hearing.
View plain text versions (2)
- S 710 c1 View text Current html
- Introduced S 710 Filed html
Action History
-
Died in Finance and Tax
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
CS by Community Affairs read 1st time
-
Now in Finance and Tax
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Community Affairs; YEAS 5 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Community Affairs, 03/20/19, 4:00 pm, 301 Senate Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Community Affairs; Finance and Tax; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Baxley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Baxley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Simmons | — | Yea |
| Flores | — | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 710?
- SB 710 is sponsored by Baxley.
- What is the current status of SB 710?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 710?
- Track SB 710 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 710
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 710
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →